Finnish Version of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis Scale: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Clinical Nurse Specialist Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/NUR.0000000000000779
Mea Mirella Marjatta Wright, Tarja Anneli Kvist, Santtu Juhani Mikkonen, Krista Susanna Jokiniemi
{"title":"Finnish Version of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis Scale: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties.","authors":"Mea Mirella Marjatta Wright, Tarja Anneli Kvist, Santtu Juhani Mikkonen, Krista Susanna Jokiniemi","doi":"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis Scale.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cultural adaptation of the translation and content validity of the translated instrument were assessed by expert panelists (n = 5) using the content validity index. The construct validity was assessed with principal component analysis using the survey data of Finnish registered nurses (n = 60). Scale reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α values. All study phases were conducted in 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The items (n = 59) of the scale were critically evaluated by the experts. The full-scale content validity was revealed as excellent (0.92). In terms of construct validity, the scale was analyzed separately for outcomes and barriers. The outcomes section revealed a 5-component structure with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of .96, and the barriers section, a 2-component structure with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of .82, indicating adequate reliability of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Finnish version of the scale showed excellent content and construct validity. The Cronbach's α values represented adequate reliability of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis scale when measuring nurses' perceived practice outcomes and barriers in the Finnish context.</p>","PeriodicalId":55249,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","volume":"37 6","pages":"281-290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10886455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis Scale.

Design: This was a cross-sectional survey study.

Methods: Cultural adaptation of the translation and content validity of the translated instrument were assessed by expert panelists (n = 5) using the content validity index. The construct validity was assessed with principal component analysis using the survey data of Finnish registered nurses (n = 60). Scale reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α values. All study phases were conducted in 2021.

Results: The items (n = 59) of the scale were critically evaluated by the experts. The full-scale content validity was revealed as excellent (0.92). In terms of construct validity, the scale was analyzed separately for outcomes and barriers. The outcomes section revealed a 5-component structure with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of .96, and the barriers section, a 2-component structure with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of .82, indicating adequate reliability of the scale.

Conclusion: The Finnish version of the scale showed excellent content and construct validity. The Cronbach's α values represented adequate reliability of the Specialist Outcomes and Barriers Analysis scale when measuring nurses' perceived practice outcomes and barriers in the Finnish context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰版专家结果和障碍分析量表:心理测量特性评估。
目的:评估芬兰版专家结果和障碍分析量表的心理测量特性。设计:这是一项横断面调查研究。方法:由专家小组成员(n=5)使用内容有效性指数评估翻译的文化适应和翻译工具的内容有效性。使用芬兰注册护士(n=60)的调查数据,采用主成分分析法评估结构有效性。用Cronbachα值评估量表的信度。所有研究阶段均在2021年进行。结果:专家对量表中的项目(n=59)进行了严格评估。全量表的内容有效性为优秀(0.92)。在结构有效性方面,对量表的结果和障碍分别进行了分析。结果部分显示了一个总Cronbachα系数为.96的5组分结构,屏障部分显示了总Cronb巴赫α系数为.82的2组分结构。这表明量表具有足够的可靠性。结论:芬兰语版量表具有良好的内容和结构有效性。Cronbachα值代表了专家结果和障碍分析量表在芬兰背景下测量护士感知的实践结果和障碍时的足够可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Clinical Nurse Specialist™: The International Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice is to disseminate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice, to foster continued development o fthe clinical nurse specialist role, and to highlight clinical nurse specialist contributions to advancing nursing practice and health policy globally. Objectives of the journal are: 1. Disseminate knowledge about clinical nurse specialist competencies and the education and regulation of practice; 2. Communicate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice on quality, safety, and cost of nursing and health services across the continuum of care; 3. Promote evidence-based practice and innovation in the transformation of nursing and health policy for the betterment of the public welfare; 4. Foster intra-professional and interdisciplinary dialogue addressing nursing and health services for specialty populations in diverse care settings adn cultures.
期刊最新文献
Improving Patient Care Through Collaborative Re-envisioning of the Model of Critical Care. Incorporating Sikh Culture Into Palliative Care of Critically Ill Children. Misuse of External Urine Management Devices in Hospitalized Patients. One Thousand Cranes: The Healing Power of the Ancient Art of Origami. Piloting an Innovative Collaboration Between a Clinical Nurse Specialist Program and a Professional Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1