Exploring human papillomavirus vaccination decision making through mother and adolescent dyad interviews.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000845
Spring Chenoa Cooper, Andrew Porter, Raz G Edwards, Julia Keegan, Jennifer Gallo, Kirsten McCaffery, S Rachel Skinner
{"title":"Exploring human papillomavirus vaccination decision making through mother and adolescent dyad interviews.","authors":"Spring Chenoa Cooper, Andrew Porter, Raz G Edwards, Julia Keegan, Jennifer Gallo, Kirsten McCaffery, S Rachel Skinner","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of our research was to explore how parents and their adolescent children make decisions about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and to inform future interventions that aim to facilitate inclusive decision-making processes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Purposive and snowball sampling strategies targeted parents and their adolescent children (ages = 11-13) in a large city in Australia. We conducted separate and joint semistructured interviews in 2013 with six mother-adolescent dyads (50% female adolescents and 50% male). Interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors that both facilitate and impede decision making emerged, including: background knowledge, values, historical experiences, parenting style, and opinion weights.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>New interventions, strategies, and tools that are informed by these decision-making factors can be used to aid productive, mutual decision making between parents and adolescents and support adolescent autonomy and self-sufficiency in health decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"182-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of our research was to explore how parents and their adolescent children make decisions about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and to inform future interventions that aim to facilitate inclusive decision-making processes.

Method: Purposive and snowball sampling strategies targeted parents and their adolescent children (ages = 11-13) in a large city in Australia. We conducted separate and joint semistructured interviews in 2013 with six mother-adolescent dyads (50% female adolescents and 50% male). Interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach.

Results: Factors that both facilitate and impede decision making emerged, including: background knowledge, values, historical experiences, parenting style, and opinion weights.

Discussion: New interventions, strategies, and tools that are informed by these decision-making factors can be used to aid productive, mutual decision making between parents and adolescents and support adolescent autonomy and self-sufficiency in health decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过母亲和青少年二人访谈探讨人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种决策。
引言:我们研究的目的是探索父母及其青少年子女如何就人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗做出决定,并为未来旨在促进包容性决策过程的干预措施提供信息。方法:有针对性和滚雪球抽样策略针对澳大利亚一个大城市的父母及其青春期子女(11-13岁)。2013年,我们对六对母子(50%为女性青少年,50%为男性)进行了单独和联合的半结构访谈。访谈采用扎根理论方法进行分析。结果:促进和阻碍决策的因素出现了,包括:背景知识、价值观、历史经历、育儿方式和意见权重。讨论:根据这些决策因素制定的新干预措施、战略和工具可用于帮助父母和青少年之间进行富有成效的相互决策,并支持青少年在健康决策方面的自主性和自给自足。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of a caregiver checklist for primary care. Adaptation of a couples intervention to promote coparenting and reduce hazardous drinking during transition to parenthood. Familism and well-being across 48 countries. Implementing a pain psychology screening process in primary care. A qualitative study on the dyadic coping experience of human papillomavirus-infected patients of childbearing age and their spouses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1