X-ray radiation dose and associated factors in neonates from the newborn unit of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia

Diana Ramírez, Víctor Ramos, Sandra Navarro, Adriana Montealegre, Julia Arciniegas
{"title":"X-ray radiation dose and associated factors in neonates from the newborn unit of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia","authors":"Diana Ramírez,&nbsp;Víctor Ramos,&nbsp;Sandra Navarro,&nbsp;Adriana Montealegre,&nbsp;Julia Arciniegas","doi":"10.7705/biomedica.6668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiographs are still widely used, underestimating the risks. This situation is frequent in neonatal care units, generating radiation doses than in adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the received radiation doses when performing radiographs on neonates and the possible factors associated with higher doses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed an observational study of 160 neonates from the newborn unit of the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. We considered the input dose of each radiograph as the dependent variable. Patients were characterized and a multivariate analysis with multiple linear regression was performed to identify associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 160 newborns and 492 radiographs. The most frequent findings were male patients (n=87, 54.4%), cesarean delivery (n=122, 76.3%), and radiograph\nindication for respiratory distress (n=123, 24.9%). One-point eight percent of the patients (n=9) did not have radiograph indication. The most frequently taken radiograph was chest (322, 65.4%). Most radiographs were taken with a computerized equipment (n=352, 71.5%), compared to a digital one (n=140, 28.4%). The median input dose with computerized equipment was 0.112 mGy (0.022, 0.134 mGy), and with the digital equipment was 0.020 mGy (0.019, 0.022 mGy).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The general and specific absorbed radiation doses were measured in neonates with a computerized and a digital equipment. We identified higher doses with the computerized equipment. In addition, it was recognized the correlation between computerized radiography equipment with lower corrected gestational ages as the main factor for dose increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":101322,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.6668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radiographs are still widely used, underestimating the risks. This situation is frequent in neonatal care units, generating radiation doses than in adults.

Objective: To quantify the received radiation doses when performing radiographs on neonates and the possible factors associated with higher doses.

Materials and methods: We performed an observational study of 160 neonates from the newborn unit of the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. We considered the input dose of each radiograph as the dependent variable. Patients were characterized and a multivariate analysis with multiple linear regression was performed to identify associated factors.

Results: We analyzed 160 newborns and 492 radiographs. The most frequent findings were male patients (n=87, 54.4%), cesarean delivery (n=122, 76.3%), and radiograph indication for respiratory distress (n=123, 24.9%). One-point eight percent of the patients (n=9) did not have radiograph indication. The most frequently taken radiograph was chest (322, 65.4%). Most radiographs were taken with a computerized equipment (n=352, 71.5%), compared to a digital one (n=140, 28.4%). The median input dose with computerized equipment was 0.112 mGy (0.022, 0.134 mGy), and with the digital equipment was 0.020 mGy (0.019, 0.022 mGy).

Conclusions: The general and specific absorbed radiation doses were measured in neonates with a computerized and a digital equipment. We identified higher doses with the computerized equipment. In addition, it was recognized the correlation between computerized radiography equipment with lower corrected gestational ages as the main factor for dose increase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚波哥大圣伊格纳西奥大学医院新生儿科新生儿的X光辐射剂量和相关因素。
介绍。X光片继续广泛使用,低估了风险。这种情况尤其发生在新生儿护理单位,这意味着新生儿接受的电离辐射剂量高于成人。目的:量化拍摄X光片时收到的辐射剂量,并评估与剂量增加有关的可能因素。材料和方法。对哥伦比亚波哥大圣伊格纳西奥大学医院新生儿科的160名新生儿进行了观察研究。每个X光片进入皮肤的剂量被认为是一个因变量。对患者进行了表征,然后进行多元线性回归分析,以确定相关因素。结果:共分析160例患者和492张X光片。最常见的发现包括:男性患者(n=87;54.4%)、剖腹产(n=122;76.3%)和呼吸困难X光检查的适应症(n=123;24.9%)。1.8%(n=9)的患者没有X光片的适应症。最常见的X光片是胸部X光片(n=322;65.4%)。大多数X光片是用计算机设备(n=352;71.5%)拍摄的,而不是数字设备(n=140,28.4%)。使用计算机设备的皮肤进入剂量中位数为0.112 mgy(0.022;0.134 mgy),使用数字设备的皮肤进入剂量中位数为0.020 mgy(0.019,0.022 mgy)。结论:使用计算机和数字设备量化了新生儿吸收的一般和特定辐射剂量。计算机设备确定了更高的剂量。计算机化团队与纠正的未成年妊娠之间的相互作用被认为是剂量增加的主要因素。此外,计算机化设备与纠正的低胎龄之间的关系被认为是增加剂量的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A comparative analysis of programmatic outcome indicators between Buenaventura and other municipalities of Valle del Cauca, Colombia Association of birth and periodontal disease in Bolivia, Chile and Colombia Fungal coinfection/superinfection in COVID-19 patients in a tertiary hospital in Mexico Correlation between disease severity indices and quality of life measurement tools in atopic dermatitis patients Social determinants of health, the research we need.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1