Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions

Abstract

More peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are detected by low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) either incidentally or via dedicated lung cancer screening programs. Thus, using methods for safe and accurate diagnosis of these lesions has become increasingly important. Transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) are routinely performed during the diagnostic workup for PPLs. However, TTNA often carries the risk of pneumothorax, uncontrollable airway hemorrhage, and does not allow mediastinal staging in one procedure. In contrast, traditional TBLB often has a poorer diagnostic yield despite fewer complications. With the ongoing development of technology applied to bronchoscopy, guided bronchoscopy has become widely used and the diagnostic yield of TBLB has improved. Additionally, guided bronchoscopy continues to demonstrate a better safety profile than TTNA. In recent years, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) has been introduced and implemented in the diagnosis of PPLs. At present, RAB has two platforms that are commercially available: Monarch™ and Ion™; several other platforms are under development. Both systems differ in characteristics, advantages, and limitations and offer features not seen in previous guided bronchoscopy. Several studies, including cadaveric model studies and clinical trials, have been conducted to examine the feasibility and performance of RAB using these two systems; large multicenter studies are underway. In this review, published experimental results, focusing on diagnostic yield and complications of RAB, are analyzed and the potential clinical application of RAB is discussed, which will enable the operators to have a clear overview of RAB.