Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Identifies Distinct Physiologic Endotypes in Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Michael G. Risbano MD, MA, FCCP , Corrine R. Kliment MD, PhD , Daniel G. Dunlap MD , Carl Koch MD , Luiz Campedelli MD , Karla Yoney PA-C , S. Mehdi Nouraie MD, PhD , Frank Sciurba MD , Alison Morris MD
{"title":"Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Identifies Distinct Physiologic Endotypes in Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection","authors":"Michael G. Risbano MD, MA, FCCP ,&nbsp;Corrine R. Kliment MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel G. Dunlap MD ,&nbsp;Carl Koch MD ,&nbsp;Luiz Campedelli MD ,&nbsp;Karla Yoney PA-C ,&nbsp;S. Mehdi Nouraie MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Frank Sciurba MD ,&nbsp;Alison Morris MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2023.100010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Exercise intolerance and dyspnea on exertion are prominent symptoms in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) that significantly impact quality of life, but underlying physiologic contributors are not well understood. Invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) uses right heart catheterization, arterial access, and standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing to identify pathophysiology in undifferentiated exercise intolerance.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>What are the distinguishing clinical and physiologic features of exercise intolerant PASC and associated physiologic endotypes?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>We performed a cross-sectional observational study with prospective enrollment of consecutive patients with dyspnea and/or exercise-intolerant PASC who were referred for iCPET &gt; 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. All patients underwent history, physical examination, pulmonary function testing, echocardiogram, laboratory work, and chest imaging. We completed a detailed cardiopulmonary and hemodynamic analysis of 37 patients with iCPET to categorize PASC endotypes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We evaluated 37 patients with PASC and dyspnea on exertion and/or exercise intolerance for a median of 323 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. We compared 12 patients (32.4%) who demonstrated a normal exercise capacity (normal oxygen consumption [<span><math><mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span><span>o</span><sub>2</sub>]) with 25 patients (67.6%) that had a reduced peak <span><math><mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span><span>o</span><sub>2</sub>. We then identified distinct PASC endotypes with iCPET including preload insufficiency, decreased oxygen extraction, mixed preload insufficiency with decreased oxygen extraction, exercise pulmonary hypertension, chronic pulmonary embolism, deconditioning, and ventilatory limitation, which included physiologic abnormalities in patients with PASC with normal exercise capacity. Nine of the 12 patients with normal <span><math><mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span><span>o</span><sub>2</sub> had normal exercise physiology (one had evidence of exercise pulmonary hypertension and two had decreased oxygen extraction) yet still presented with symptoms of exercise intolerance.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>iCPET identified heterogeneous physiologic endotypes in patients with PASC presenting with similar symptoms of exercise intolerance or dyspnea on exertion. Future studies are needed to define associated pathogenesis and target effective therapies based on these physiologic endotypes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789223000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Exercise intolerance and dyspnea on exertion are prominent symptoms in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) that significantly impact quality of life, but underlying physiologic contributors are not well understood. Invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) uses right heart catheterization, arterial access, and standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing to identify pathophysiology in undifferentiated exercise intolerance.

Research Question

What are the distinguishing clinical and physiologic features of exercise intolerant PASC and associated physiologic endotypes?

Study Design and Methods

We performed a cross-sectional observational study with prospective enrollment of consecutive patients with dyspnea and/or exercise-intolerant PASC who were referred for iCPET > 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. All patients underwent history, physical examination, pulmonary function testing, echocardiogram, laboratory work, and chest imaging. We completed a detailed cardiopulmonary and hemodynamic analysis of 37 patients with iCPET to categorize PASC endotypes.

Results

We evaluated 37 patients with PASC and dyspnea on exertion and/or exercise intolerance for a median of 323 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. We compared 12 patients (32.4%) who demonstrated a normal exercise capacity (normal oxygen consumption [V˙o2]) with 25 patients (67.6%) that had a reduced peak V˙o2. We then identified distinct PASC endotypes with iCPET including preload insufficiency, decreased oxygen extraction, mixed preload insufficiency with decreased oxygen extraction, exercise pulmonary hypertension, chronic pulmonary embolism, deconditioning, and ventilatory limitation, which included physiologic abnormalities in patients with PASC with normal exercise capacity. Nine of the 12 patients with normal V˙o2 had normal exercise physiology (one had evidence of exercise pulmonary hypertension and two had decreased oxygen extraction) yet still presented with symptoms of exercise intolerance.

Interpretation

iCPET identified heterogeneous physiologic endotypes in patients with PASC presenting with similar symptoms of exercise intolerance or dyspnea on exertion. Future studies are needed to define associated pathogenesis and target effective therapies based on these physiologic endotypes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有创心肺运动试验识别SARS-CoV-2感染急性后后遗症的不同生理性内源性类型
背景运动不耐受和运动时呼吸困难是新冠肺炎急性后后遗症的突出症状,对生活质量有显著影响,但其潜在的生理因素尚不清楚。有创心肺运动试验(iCPET)使用右心导管插入术、动脉介入和标准心肺运动测试来确定未分化运动不耐受的病理生理学。研究问题运动不耐受性PASC和相关生理内型的临床和生理特征有哪些?研究设计和方法我们进行了一项横断面观察性研究,前瞻性纳入了被转诊为iCPET>;严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染后3个月。所有患者均接受了病史、体格检查、肺功能测试、超声心动图、实验室检查和胸部影像学检查。我们完成了对37名iCPET患者的详细心肺和血液动力学分析,以对PASC内型进行分类。结果我们评估了37名患有PASC和因运动和/或运动不耐受而呼吸困难的患者,诊断为新冠肺炎后平均323天。我们比较了12名表现出正常运动能力(正常耗氧量[V*o2])的患者(32.4%)和25名峰值V*o2降低的患者(67.6%)。然后,我们用iCPET确定了不同的PASC内型,包括预负荷不足、吸氧量减少、预负荷不足与吸氧量减少混合、运动性肺动脉高压、慢性肺栓塞、去适应和通气限制,其中包括运动能力正常的PASC患者的生理异常。12名V*o2正常的患者中,有9人运动生理正常(1人有运动性肺动脉高压的证据,2人吸氧量减少),但仍表现出运动不耐受的症状。解释iCPET在PASC患者中发现了异质性生理内型,表现出类似的运动不耐受或运动时呼吸困难症状。未来的研究需要确定相关的发病机制,并基于这些生理内型靶向有效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Male Sex With Worse Right Ventricular Function and Survival in Pulmonary Hypertension in the Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension Through Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics Cohort Adapting the Tools of Our Trade Dynamic Digital Radiography Pulmonary Function Testing Annual Adherence of Asian American Individuals in a Lung Cancer Screening Program Compared With Other Racial Groups Strategies for the Management of a Pulmonary Function Laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1