A similarity-assisted multi-fidelity approach to conceptual design space exploration

IF 8.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers in Industry Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compind.2023.103957
Julian Martinsson Bonde , Michael Kokkolaras , Petter Andersson , Massimo Panarotto , Ola Isaksson
{"title":"A similarity-assisted multi-fidelity approach to conceptual design space exploration","authors":"Julian Martinsson Bonde ,&nbsp;Michael Kokkolaras ,&nbsp;Petter Andersson ,&nbsp;Massimo Panarotto ,&nbsp;Ola Isaksson","doi":"10.1016/j.compind.2023.103957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In conceptual design studies engineers typically utilize data-based surrogate models to enable rapid evaluation of design objectives that otherwise would be too computationally expensive and time-consuming to simulate. Due to the computationally expensive simulations, the data-based surrogate models are often trained using small sample sizes, resulting in low-fidelity models which can produce results that are not trustworthy. To mitigate this issue, a similarity-assisted design space exploration method is proposed. The similarity is measured between design points that have been evaluated through lower-fidelity data-based surrogate models and design points that have been evaluated using higher-fidelity physics-based simulations. This similarity information can then be used by design engineers to better understand the trustworthiness of the data produced by the low-fidelity surrogate models. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that such a similarity measurement can be used as an indicator of the trustworthiness of the lower-fidelity model predictions. Moreover, a second similarity metric is proposed for measuring the similarity of new designs to legacy designs, thus highlighting the potential to reuse knowledge, analysis models, and data. The proposed method is demonstrated by means of an aero-engine structural component conceptual design study. An open-source software tool developed to assist in data visualization is also presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55219,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Industry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361523001070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In conceptual design studies engineers typically utilize data-based surrogate models to enable rapid evaluation of design objectives that otherwise would be too computationally expensive and time-consuming to simulate. Due to the computationally expensive simulations, the data-based surrogate models are often trained using small sample sizes, resulting in low-fidelity models which can produce results that are not trustworthy. To mitigate this issue, a similarity-assisted design space exploration method is proposed. The similarity is measured between design points that have been evaluated through lower-fidelity data-based surrogate models and design points that have been evaluated using higher-fidelity physics-based simulations. This similarity information can then be used by design engineers to better understand the trustworthiness of the data produced by the low-fidelity surrogate models. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that such a similarity measurement can be used as an indicator of the trustworthiness of the lower-fidelity model predictions. Moreover, a second similarity metric is proposed for measuring the similarity of new designs to legacy designs, thus highlighting the potential to reuse knowledge, analysis models, and data. The proposed method is demonstrated by means of an aero-engine structural component conceptual design study. An open-source software tool developed to assist in data visualization is also presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念设计空间探索的相似度辅助多保真度方法
在概念设计研究中,工程师通常利用基于数据的代理模型来实现对设计目标的快速评估,否则设计目标的计算成本和模拟耗时太高。由于计算成本高昂的模拟,基于数据的代理模型通常使用小样本量进行训练,导致低保真度模型,其可能产生不可信的结果。为了缓解这一问题,提出了一种相似性辅助设计空间探索方法。通过基于低保真度数据的代理模型评估的设计点与使用基于高保真度物理的模拟评估的设计点通过测量相似性。然后,设计工程师可以使用该相似性信息来更好地理解由低保真度代理模型产生的数据的可信度。我们的数值实验表明,这种相似性测量可以用作低保真度模型预测可信度的指标。此外,提出了第二个相似性度量,用于测量新设计与传统设计的相似性,从而突出重用知识、分析模型和数据的潜力。通过航空发动机结构件概念设计研究,验证了该方法的有效性。还介绍了一个为帮助数据可视化而开发的开源软件工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in Industry
Computers in Industry 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
152
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The objective of Computers in Industry is to present original, high-quality, application-oriented research papers that: • Illuminate emerging trends and possibilities in the utilization of Information and Communication Technology in industry; • Establish connections or integrations across various technology domains within the expansive realm of computer applications for industry; • Foster connections or integrations across diverse application areas of ICT in industry.
期刊最新文献
Rapid quality control for recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) streams: Multi-sensor integration for advanced contaminant detection Apple varieties and growth prediction with time series classification based on deep learning to impact the harvesting decisions Maximum subspace transferability discriminant analysis: A new cross-domain similarity measure for wind-turbine fault transfer diagnosis Dual channel visible graph convolutional neural network for microleakage monitoring of pipeline weld homalographic cracks Video-based automatic people counting for public transport: On-bus versus off-bus deployment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1