Update and validation of the lifetime cardiovascular risk in Spain: IBERLIFERISK2

Carlos Brotons , Irene Moral-Peláez , Johanna Vicuña , Cristina Ameixeiras , Carlos Fernández-Lavandera , Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Chaparro
{"title":"Update and validation of the lifetime cardiovascular risk in Spain: IBERLIFERISK2","authors":"Carlos Brotons ,&nbsp;Irene Moral-Peláez ,&nbsp;Johanna Vicuña ,&nbsp;Cristina Ameixeiras ,&nbsp;Carlos Fernández-Lavandera ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Chaparro","doi":"10.1016/j.artere.2023.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The function to estimate lifetime cardiovascular risk –IBERLIFERISK– in Spanish working population, obtained a satisfactory discrimination; however, there was a slight overestimation of the risk in men and an underestimation of the risk in women.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To recalibrate the current lifetime risk equation after extending the follow-up by 3 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Retrospective cohort study. 762.058 workers who underwent an </span>occupational health<span> examination between 2004 and 2007 were included. All episodes of temporary sickness and cardiovascular mortality<span> up to December 2017 were evaluated. Regression models were combined to take into account the presence of competing risks in estimating cardiovascular risk in the derivation cohort. Calibration was performed by graphically representing the proportion of expected and observed events at 10 years of follow-up in the validation cohort, stratifying by risk deciles and calculating the Spiegelhalter Z statistic. Discrimination was evaluated graphically using the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) and calculating Harrell’s C index.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age was 35.48 years (SD 10.56). 71.14% were men. Harrell’s C index was 0.78 (95% CI 0.76–0.79) in men and 0.73 (95% CI 0.69–0.77) in women. In general, there was a slight degree of underestimation in women and overestimation in men in the last decile of risk, although the Spiegelhalter Z statistic was not statistically significant in both sexes (p<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The updated model continues to discriminate satisfactorily, although the model’s calibration has not substantially improved with the new update.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100263,"journal":{"name":"Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition)","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529912323000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The function to estimate lifetime cardiovascular risk –IBERLIFERISK– in Spanish working population, obtained a satisfactory discrimination; however, there was a slight overestimation of the risk in men and an underestimation of the risk in women.

Objective

To recalibrate the current lifetime risk equation after extending the follow-up by 3 years.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study. 762.058 workers who underwent an occupational health examination between 2004 and 2007 were included. All episodes of temporary sickness and cardiovascular mortality up to December 2017 were evaluated. Regression models were combined to take into account the presence of competing risks in estimating cardiovascular risk in the derivation cohort. Calibration was performed by graphically representing the proportion of expected and observed events at 10 years of follow-up in the validation cohort, stratifying by risk deciles and calculating the Spiegelhalter Z statistic. Discrimination was evaluated graphically using the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) and calculating Harrell’s C index.

Results

The mean age was 35.48 years (SD 10.56). 71.14% were men. Harrell’s C index was 0.78 (95% CI 0.76–0.79) in men and 0.73 (95% CI 0.69–0.77) in women. In general, there was a slight degree of underestimation in women and overestimation in men in the last decile of risk, although the Spiegelhalter Z statistic was not statistically significant in both sexes (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The updated model continues to discriminate satisfactorily, although the model’s calibration has not substantially improved with the new update.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙终生心血管风险的更新和验证:IBERLIFEERISK2
引言在西班牙工作人群中估计终身心血管风险的功能IBERLIFERISK获得了令人满意的判别;然而,男性的风险略有高估,女性的风险则有所低估。目的在延长随访3年后,重新校准当前的终生风险方程。方法回顾性队列研究。762.058名在2004年至2007年期间接受职业健康检查的工人也包括在内。对截至2017年12月的所有暂时性疾病发作和心血管死亡率进行了评估。将回归模型结合起来,以考虑衍生队列中估计心血管风险时存在的竞争风险。通过图形化表示验证队列中10年随访时预期和观察到的事件的比例,按风险十分位数进行分层,并计算Spiegelholter Z统计量来进行校准。使用受试者工作曲线(ROC)并计算Harrell的C指数以图形方式评估辨别度。结果平均年龄35.48岁(标准差10.56),男性71.14%。男性的Harrell C指数为0.78(95%CI 0.76–0.79),女性为0.73(95%CI 0.69–0.77)。总的来说,尽管Spiegelholter Z统计数据在两性中都没有统计学意义(p>0.05),但在最后十分之一的风险中,女性和男性都有轻微的低估和高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dietary plant microRNAs as potential regulators of cellular cholesterol efflux A new perspective on the regulatory role of miRNAS. Cross-kingdom regulation Clinical characterization and detection of subclinical atherosclerosis in subjects with extreme hyperalphalipoproteinemia Risk factors and assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with psoriatic arthritis In vitro 3D co-culture model of human endothelial and smooth muscle cells to study pathological vascular remodeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1