Vesicostomy: An alternative approach for complicated adult patients with urinary retention

Masatoshi Kumagai, Masaaki Imamura, Kei Muraoka, Michiko Fukasawa, Mika Fukushima, Ryo Yabusaki, Masakatsu Ueda, Yusuke Shiraishi, Koji Yoshimura
{"title":"Vesicostomy: An alternative approach for complicated adult patients with urinary retention","authors":"Masatoshi Kumagai,&nbsp;Masaaki Imamura,&nbsp;Kei Muraoka,&nbsp;Michiko Fukasawa,&nbsp;Mika Fukushima,&nbsp;Ryo Yabusaki,&nbsp;Masakatsu Ueda,&nbsp;Yusuke Shiraishi,&nbsp;Koji Yoshimura","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2023.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><p>Patients with permanent urethral catheterization for chronic urinary retention frequently experience several complications, such as bladder stones and/or urinary tract infections. In this study, we performed vesicostomy in adult patients with urinary retention who developed complications during long-term indwelling catheterization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>Patients with a permanent bladder catheter for urinary retention, and bladder stones and/or urinary tract infection between April 2019 and October 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Vesicostomy and additional surgeries, such as vesicolithotomy, were performed if necessary. Residual urine volume was measured with computed tomography 7 days after the operation. We followed-up all patients 3 months postoperatively to identify complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Nine patients were included in this study; eight were male and one was female. The median age at operation was 65 (range, 23–92) years. Concurrent operations were lithotomy in five, cystostomy closure in one, removal of a bladder foreign body in one, and nephrectomy in one. The postoperative median residual urine volume in the bladder was 32 (range, 5–51) ml. Perioperative complications comprised delirium (Clavien–Dindo grade II) in two patients and stomal bleeding (Clavien–Dindo grade II) in one patient. There were no complications of bladder stones, febrile urinary tract infection, or stomal stenosis postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><p>Vesicostomy for adult patients with urinary retention was useful and safe. Our results suggest that vesicostomy could be a bladder drainage option for select adult patients who are not candidates for permanent indwelling catheterization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974523000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:

Patients with permanent urethral catheterization for chronic urinary retention frequently experience several complications, such as bladder stones and/or urinary tract infections. In this study, we performed vesicostomy in adult patients with urinary retention who developed complications during long-term indwelling catheterization.

Methods:

Patients with a permanent bladder catheter for urinary retention, and bladder stones and/or urinary tract infection between April 2019 and October 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Vesicostomy and additional surgeries, such as vesicolithotomy, were performed if necessary. Residual urine volume was measured with computed tomography 7 days after the operation. We followed-up all patients 3 months postoperatively to identify complications.

Results:

Nine patients were included in this study; eight were male and one was female. The median age at operation was 65 (range, 23–92) years. Concurrent operations were lithotomy in five, cystostomy closure in one, removal of a bladder foreign body in one, and nephrectomy in one. The postoperative median residual urine volume in the bladder was 32 (range, 5–51) ml. Perioperative complications comprised delirium (Clavien–Dindo grade II) in two patients and stomal bleeding (Clavien–Dindo grade II) in one patient. There were no complications of bladder stones, febrile urinary tract infection, or stomal stenosis postoperatively.

Conclusions:

Vesicostomy for adult patients with urinary retention was useful and safe. Our results suggest that vesicostomy could be a bladder drainage option for select adult patients who are not candidates for permanent indwelling catheterization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱造瘘术:一种治疗复杂成人尿潴留患者的替代方法
目的:因慢性尿潴留而进行永久导尿的患者经常会出现一些并发症,如膀胱结石和/或尿路感染。在这项研究中,我们对长期留置导管插入术中出现并发症的尿潴留成年患者进行了膀胱造口术。方法:将2019年4月至2021年10月期间因尿潴留、膀胱结石和/或尿路感染而使用永久性膀胱导管的患者纳入本回顾性研究。必要时进行膀胱造瘘术和其他手术,如膀胱取石术。术后7天用计算机断层扫描测量残余尿量。我们对所有患者进行了术后3个月的随访,以确定并发症。结果:本研究共纳入9例患者;8人为男性,1人为女性。手术时的中位年龄为65岁(范围为23-92岁)。同时进行的手术有5例取石,1例膀胱造瘘闭合,1例去除膀胱异物,1例肾切除术。术后膀胱中位残余尿量为32(范围,5-51)ml。围手术期并发症包括两名患者的谵妄(Clavien-Dindo II级)和一名患者的吻合口出血(Clavien–DindoⅡ级)。术后无膀胱结石、发热性尿路感染或吻合口狭窄并发症。结论:膀胱造瘘术治疗成人尿潴留是有效和安全的。我们的研究结果表明,对于不适合永久性留置导管插入术的成年患者,膀胱造口术可能是一种膀胱引流选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underweight, dementia, and not being completely independent in bowel management are risk factors for urinary incontinence among older people Diagnosis and treatment of nocturnal enuresis throughout the ages The medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms during the nineteenth century The history of prosthetic devices for postprostatectomy incontinence Female urethroplasty using urethral diverticulum tissue as a graft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1