“To comply or to react, that is the question:” the roles of humanness versus eeriness of AI-powered virtual influencers, loneliness, and threats to human identities in AI-driven digital transformation

S. Venus Jin
{"title":"“To comply or to react, that is the question:” the roles of humanness versus eeriness of AI-powered virtual influencers, loneliness, and threats to human identities in AI-driven digital transformation","authors":"S. Venus Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>AI-powered virtual influencers play a variety of roles in emerging media environments. To test the diffusion of AI-powered virtual influencers among social media users and to examine antecedents, mediators, and moderators relevant to compliance with and reactance to virtual influencers, data were collected using two cross-sectional surveys (∑ <em>N</em> = 1623). Drawing on the Diffusion of Innovations theory, survey data from Study 1 (<em>N</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> = 987) provide preliminary descriptive statistics about US social media users' levels of awareness of, knowledge of, exposure to, and engagement with virtual influencers. Drawing from the theoretical frameworks of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis and the CASA (Computers Are Social Actors) paradigm, Study 2 examines social media users' compliance with versus reactance to AI-powered virtual influencers. Survey data from Study 2 (<em>N</em><sub><em>2</em></sub> = 636) provide inferential statistics supporting the moderated serial mediation model that proposes (1) empathy and engagement with AI-powered virtual influencers mediate the effects of perceived humanness versus eeriness of virtual influencers on social media users' behavioral intention to purchase the products recommended by the virtual influencers (serial and total mediation effects) and (2) loneliness moderates the effects of humanness versus eeriness on empathy. Drawing from the theory of Psychological Reactance, Study 2 further reports the moderation effect of social media users' trait reactance and perceived threats to one's own human identity on the relationship between perceived eeriness and compliance with versus situational reactance to virtual influencers. Theoretical contributions to CASA research and the Uncanny Valley literature as well as managerial implications for AI-driven digital transformation in media industries and virtual influencer marketing are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI-powered virtual influencers play a variety of roles in emerging media environments. To test the diffusion of AI-powered virtual influencers among social media users and to examine antecedents, mediators, and moderators relevant to compliance with and reactance to virtual influencers, data were collected using two cross-sectional surveys (∑ N = 1623). Drawing on the Diffusion of Innovations theory, survey data from Study 1 (N1 = 987) provide preliminary descriptive statistics about US social media users' levels of awareness of, knowledge of, exposure to, and engagement with virtual influencers. Drawing from the theoretical frameworks of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis and the CASA (Computers Are Social Actors) paradigm, Study 2 examines social media users' compliance with versus reactance to AI-powered virtual influencers. Survey data from Study 2 (N2 = 636) provide inferential statistics supporting the moderated serial mediation model that proposes (1) empathy and engagement with AI-powered virtual influencers mediate the effects of perceived humanness versus eeriness of virtual influencers on social media users' behavioral intention to purchase the products recommended by the virtual influencers (serial and total mediation effects) and (2) loneliness moderates the effects of humanness versus eeriness on empathy. Drawing from the theory of Psychological Reactance, Study 2 further reports the moderation effect of social media users' trait reactance and perceived threats to one's own human identity on the relationship between perceived eeriness and compliance with versus situational reactance to virtual influencers. Theoretical contributions to CASA research and the Uncanny Valley literature as well as managerial implications for AI-driven digital transformation in media industries and virtual influencer marketing are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是遵从还是回应,这是一个问题:“在人工智能驱动的数字化转型中,人性与人工智能驱动的虚拟影响者的怪异、孤独以及对人类身份的威胁。
人工智能驱动的虚拟影响者在新兴媒体环境中扮演着各种角色。为了测试人工智能驱动的虚拟影响者在社交媒体用户中的传播,并检查与遵守和抵制虚拟影响者相关的前因、中介和调节因素,使用两项横断面调查收集了数据(∑N=1623)。根据创新扩散理论,研究1(N1=987)的调查数据提供了关于美国社交媒体用户对虚拟影响者的意识、知识、接触和参与程度的初步描述性统计数据。研究2借鉴了Uncanny Valley假说和CASA(计算机是社会行动者)范式的理论框架,考察了社交媒体用户对人工智能虚拟影响者的依从性和抗拒性。研究2的调查数据(N2=636)提供了推理统计数据,支持有调节的系列中介模型,该模型提出(1)与人工智能驱动的虚拟影响者的同理心和参与度中介了虚拟影响者感知的人性与怪异对社交媒体用户购买虚拟影响者推荐的产品的行为意向的影响(系列和整体中介效应)和(2)孤独调节了人性与怪异对移情的影响。根据心理反应理论,研究2进一步报道了社交媒体用户的特质反应和对自身人类身份的感知威胁对感知怪异和对虚拟影响者的顺从与情境反应之间关系的调节作用。讨论了对CASA研究和Uncanny Valley文献的理论贡献,以及对媒体行业人工智能驱动的数字化转型和虚拟影响力营销的管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can ChatGPT read who you are? Understanding young adults’ attitudes towards using AI chatbots for psychotherapy: The role of self-stigma Aversion against machines with complex mental abilities: The role of individual differences Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine Integrating sound effects and background music in Robotic storytelling – A series of online studies across different story genres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1