Defining the environmental determinants of dysbiosis at scale with zebrafish

IF 6.1 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Current Opinion in Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100430
Thomas J. Sharpton , Alexandra Alexiev , Robyn L. Tanguay
{"title":"Defining the environmental determinants of dysbiosis at scale with zebrafish","authors":"Thomas J. Sharpton ,&nbsp;Alexandra Alexiev ,&nbsp;Robyn L. Tanguay","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The gut microbiome<span><span><span>, critical to maintaining vertebrate homeostasis, is susceptible to various exposures. In some cases, these exposures induce </span>dysbiosis, wherein the microbiome changes into a state conducive to </span>disease progression. To better prevent, manage, and treat health disorders, we need to define which exposures induce dysbiosis. Contemporary methods face challenges due to the immense diversity of the </span></span>exposome and the restricted throughput of conventional experimental tools used for dysbiosis evaluation. We propose integrating high-throughput model systems as an augment to traditional techniques for rapid identification of dysbiosis-inducing agents. Although high-throughput screening tools revolutionized areas such as pharmacology and toxicology, their incorporation in gut microbiome research remains limited. One particularly powerful high-throughput model system is the zebrafish, which affords access to scalable </span><em>in vivo</em><span> experimentation involving a complex gut microbiome. Numerous studies have employed this model to identify potential dysbiosis triggers. However, its potential could be further harnessed via innovative study designs, such as evaluation of synergistic effects from combined exposures, expansions to the methodological toolkit to discern causal effects of microbiota, and efforts to assess and improve the translational relevance of the model. Ultimately, this burgeoning experimental resource can accelerate the discovery of agents that underlie dysbiotic disorders.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100430"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202023000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gut microbiome, critical to maintaining vertebrate homeostasis, is susceptible to various exposures. In some cases, these exposures induce dysbiosis, wherein the microbiome changes into a state conducive to disease progression. To better prevent, manage, and treat health disorders, we need to define which exposures induce dysbiosis. Contemporary methods face challenges due to the immense diversity of the exposome and the restricted throughput of conventional experimental tools used for dysbiosis evaluation. We propose integrating high-throughput model systems as an augment to traditional techniques for rapid identification of dysbiosis-inducing agents. Although high-throughput screening tools revolutionized areas such as pharmacology and toxicology, their incorporation in gut microbiome research remains limited. One particularly powerful high-throughput model system is the zebrafish, which affords access to scalable in vivo experimentation involving a complex gut microbiome. Numerous studies have employed this model to identify potential dysbiosis triggers. However, its potential could be further harnessed via innovative study designs, such as evaluation of synergistic effects from combined exposures, expansions to the methodological toolkit to discern causal effects of microbiota, and efforts to assess and improve the translational relevance of the model. Ultimately, this burgeoning experimental resource can accelerate the discovery of agents that underlie dysbiotic disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定斑马鱼大规模生态失调的环境决定因素
肠道微生物组对维持脊椎动物体内平衡至关重要,易受各种暴露的影响。在某些情况下,这些暴露会导致微生态失调,其中微生物组会转变为有利于疾病进展的状态。为了更好地预防、管理和治疗健康障碍,我们需要确定哪些暴露会导致微生态失调。由于暴露组的巨大多样性和用于微生态失调评估的传统实验工具的吞吐量有限,当代方法面临挑战。我们建议集成高通量模型系统,作为对快速识别微生态失调诱导剂的传统技术的补充。尽管高通量筛选工具彻底改变了药理学和毒理学等领域,但它们在肠道微生物组研究中的应用仍然有限。一个特别强大的高通量模型系统是斑马鱼,它提供了涉及复杂肠道微生物组的可扩展体内实验。许多研究已经使用该模型来确定潜在的微生态失调触发因素。然而,它的潜力可以通过创新的研究设计得到进一步利用,例如评估联合暴露的协同效应,扩展方法工具包以识别微生物群的因果效应,以及努力评估和提高模型的转化相关性。最终,这一新兴的实验资源可以加速发现导致失调的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mixture toxicity: A hot topic in toxicology and chemical risk assessment Editorial: Guardians of Tomorrow: Developmental Toxicology for Future Generations Editorial: Role of the microbiome in toxicology How single-cell transcriptomics provides insight on hepatic responses to TCDD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1