Networks and institutions in sustainable forest use: Evidence from South-East Tanzania

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2022.03.002
Lasse F. Henriksen , Caleb Gallemore , Kelvin Kamnde , Pilly Silvano , Asubisye Mwamfupe , Mette Olwig
{"title":"Networks and institutions in sustainable forest use: Evidence from South-East Tanzania","authors":"Lasse F. Henriksen ,&nbsp;Caleb Gallemore ,&nbsp;Kelvin Kamnde ,&nbsp;Pilly Silvano ,&nbsp;Asubisye Mwamfupe ,&nbsp;Mette Olwig","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2022.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite growing interest in the impacts of both forest certification and networks in effective natural resource management, there is little literature that brings these two lines of inquiry together. Combining longitudinal remote sensing and village-level forest governance network data, we estimate Cox proportional hazard models predicting the risk of forest loss within 100-square meter forest plots in areas that eventually came under Forest Stewardship Council certification. Our models indicate Forest Stewardship Council certification substantially reduces deforestation, despite that the system is not explicitly designed to do so. While villages with ties to civil society organizations also tend to experience reduced deforestation, those with ties to private sector organizations experience more forest loss. Further, we find that forest loss declines as the share of closed triangles in villages’ governance networks increases. Our results indicate network structure may complement Forest Stewardship Council certification’s impact on forest cover and account for some reduction in deforestation previously attributed to certification itself.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"75 ","pages":"Pages 39-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873322000399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite growing interest in the impacts of both forest certification and networks in effective natural resource management, there is little literature that brings these two lines of inquiry together. Combining longitudinal remote sensing and village-level forest governance network data, we estimate Cox proportional hazard models predicting the risk of forest loss within 100-square meter forest plots in areas that eventually came under Forest Stewardship Council certification. Our models indicate Forest Stewardship Council certification substantially reduces deforestation, despite that the system is not explicitly designed to do so. While villages with ties to civil society organizations also tend to experience reduced deforestation, those with ties to private sector organizations experience more forest loss. Further, we find that forest loss declines as the share of closed triangles in villages’ governance networks increases. Our results indicate network structure may complement Forest Stewardship Council certification’s impact on forest cover and account for some reduction in deforestation previously attributed to certification itself.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续森林利用的网络和机构:来自坦桑尼亚东南部的证据
尽管人们对森林认证和网络对有效自然资源管理的影响越来越感兴趣,但很少有文献将这两条调查线结合起来。结合纵向遥感和村级森林治理网络数据,我们估计了Cox比例风险模型,该模型预测了最终获得森林管理委员会认证的地区100平方米林地内的森林损失风险。我们的模型表明,森林管理委员会的认证大大减少了森林砍伐,尽管该系统并没有明确设计为这样做。虽然与民间社会组织有联系的村庄也往往会减少森林砍伐,但与私营部门组织有关的村庄会经历更多的森林损失。此外,我们发现,随着封闭三角形在村庄治理网络中的份额增加,森林损失下降。我们的研究结果表明,网络结构可以补充森林管理委员会认证对森林覆盖率的影响,并解释以前由于认证本身导致的森林砍伐减少的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive Editorial Board How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality A stopping rule for randomly sampling bipartite networks with fixed degree sequences Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1