Failure to post-dilate BeSmooth peripheral stents to adult vessel size diameters during bench-side tests

R. Haddad, D. Bonnet, S. Malekzadeh-Milani
{"title":"Failure to post-dilate BeSmooth peripheral stents to adult vessel size diameters during bench-side tests","authors":"R. Haddad,&nbsp;D. Bonnet,&nbsp;S. Malekzadeh-Milani","doi":"10.1016/j.acvdsp.2023.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Low-profile stent implantation remains a rescue treatment<span> for aortic coarctation and branch </span></span>pulmonary arteries stenosis in small children. Stent re-expansion to cope with vascular growth remains problematic.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate ex-vivo feasibility and mechanical behavior of over-dilating BeSmooth peripheral stents (Bentley InnoMed, Germany).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three BeSmooth stents in diameters of 7, 8, and 10<!--> <!-->mm were dilated to nominal pressure and then 13atm. Test-1 (sequential up-sizing post-dilation without re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated using 12, 14, and 16<!--> <!-->mm high-pressure balloons. Test-2 (post-dilation until plateau/breakpoint then re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated with 14<!--> <!-->mm balloon until plateau/breakpoint and then with 48<!--> <!-->mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 14<!--> <!-->mm balloon. Test-3 (straightforward re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø8<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm was directly post-dilated with 48<!--> <!-->mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 16<!--> <span>mm balloon. The stents’ diameter and length were measured. Balloon rupture and stent fracture patterns were closely evaluated.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results/Expected results</h3><p>Test-1: BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated to 10<!--> <!-->mm diameter with a little shortening. Up-sizing the stent to 11<!--> <!-->mm with the Ø14<!--> <!-->mm balloon led to the stent shrinking to 3.2<!--> <!-->mm. At 20atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm shortened to 2<!--> <!-->mm forming a 12<!--> <!-->mm diameter solid ring circle, and the 16<!--> <!-->mm woven balloon ruptured radially. Test-2: The BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm reached a plateau diameter of 13<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and the balloon did not rupture. Stent-in-stent re-expansion showed that at 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm fractured longitudinally in various dispatched breaking points at a diameter of 13<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and ruptured the balloon with multiple pinholes. Test-3: At 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø8<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm fractured centrally at three different points at a diameter of 11.5<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and the balloon broke radially in half.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion/Perspectives</h3><p>In our benchmark tests, extreme shortening, severe balloon rupture, or unpredictable stent fracture patterns at small balloon diameters limits the safe post-dilation of BeSmooth stents beyond 13<!--> <!-->mm. BeSmooth stents are not ideal candidates for off-label stent interventions in smaller patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8140,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","volume":"15 4","pages":"Page 280"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878648023002367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Low-profile stent implantation remains a rescue treatment for aortic coarctation and branch pulmonary arteries stenosis in small children. Stent re-expansion to cope with vascular growth remains problematic.

Objective

To evaluate ex-vivo feasibility and mechanical behavior of over-dilating BeSmooth peripheral stents (Bentley InnoMed, Germany).

Methods

Three BeSmooth stents in diameters of 7, 8, and 10 mm were dilated to nominal pressure and then 13atm. Test-1 (sequential up-sizing post-dilation without re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm was post-dilated using 12, 14, and 16 mm high-pressure balloons. Test-2 (post-dilation until plateau/breakpoint then re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø10 × 57 mm was post-dilated with 14 mm balloon until plateau/breakpoint and then with 48 mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 14 mm balloon. Test-3 (straightforward re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø8 × 57 mm was directly post-dilated with 48 mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 16 mm balloon. The stents’ diameter and length were measured. Balloon rupture and stent fracture patterns were closely evaluated.

Results/Expected results

Test-1: BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm was post-dilated to 10 mm diameter with a little shortening. Up-sizing the stent to 11 mm with the Ø14 mm balloon led to the stent shrinking to 3.2 mm. At 20atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm shortened to 2 mm forming a 12 mm diameter solid ring circle, and the 16 mm woven balloon ruptured radially. Test-2: The BeSmooth Ø10 × 23 mm reached a plateau diameter of 13 mm without shortening and the balloon did not rupture. Stent-in-stent re-expansion showed that at 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø10 × 57 mm fractured longitudinally in various dispatched breaking points at a diameter of 13 mm without shortening and ruptured the balloon with multiple pinholes. Test-3: At 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø8 × 57 mm fractured centrally at three different points at a diameter of 11.5 mm without shortening and the balloon broke radially in half.

Conclusion/Perspectives

In our benchmark tests, extreme shortening, severe balloon rupture, or unpredictable stent fracture patterns at small balloon diameters limits the safe post-dilation of BeSmooth stents beyond 13 mm. BeSmooth stents are not ideal candidates for off-label stent interventions in smaller patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在试验台侧试验中未能将周围支架扩张至成人血管直径
低剖面支架植入术仍然是治疗小儿主动脉缩窄和肺动脉分支狭窄的一种有效方法。支架再扩张以应对血管生长仍然存在问题。目的评价过度扩张BeSmooth外周支架(Bentley InnoMed,德国)的体外可行性和力学性能。测试-1(在不重新支架植入的情况下连续扩大扩张后尺寸):使用12、14和16 mm高压球囊对BeSmoothæ7×23 mm进行扩张后。测试-2(后扩张至平台/断点,然后重新支架植入):用14 mm球囊后扩张BeSmoothÅ10×57 mm,直至平台/断点。然后用48 mm裸金属Optimus XXL支架手动安装在14 mm球囊上。测试-3(直接再支架植入):用48 mm裸金属Optimus XXL支架手动安装在16 mm球囊上,直接对BeSmoothæ8×57 mm进行后扩张。测量支架的直径和长度。对球囊破裂和支架破裂模式进行了密切评估。结果/预期结果测试1:BeSmooth 7×23 mm后扩张至10 mm直径,并有一点缩短。使用dst 14 mm球囊将支架尺寸增大至11 mm,导致支架收缩至3.2 mm。在20atm压力下,BeSmooth dst 7×23 mm缩短至2 mm,形成直径为12 mm的实心环,16 mm编织球囊径向破裂。测试-2:BeSmooth CX3-20 10×23 mm在没有缩短的情况下达到了13 mm的平台直径,气球也没有破裂。支架内再膨胀显示,在10atm压力下,BeSmoothæ10×57 mm在直径为13 mm的不同断裂点纵向断裂,没有缩短,并使球囊破裂,形成多个针孔。测试-3:在10atm压力下,BeSmoothæ8×57 mm在直径11.5 mm的三个不同点处集中断裂,球囊径向断成两半。结论/前瞻性在我们的基准测试中,球囊直径较小时,球囊极短、严重破裂或不可预测的支架破裂模式限制了BeSmooth支架扩张后的安全性超过13mm。BeSmooth支架不是小型患者标签外支架干预的理想候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
期刊介绍: Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements is the official journal of the French Society of Cardiology. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles, editorials, and Images in cardiovascular medicine. The topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Additionally, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Contents How to Report postoperative pediatric cardiac surgery? Review and analysis of the literature Surgical or transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, how to choose ? No coronary artery in the aorta: Severe congenital malformation under-diagnosed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1