Effect of deficit irrigation under furrow irrigation techniques on garlic (Allium sativum L.) productivity at the central highland of Ethiopia

Biruk Getaneh Ayele , Shemelies Asseffa , Abraham Woldemichael Tuhar
{"title":"Effect of deficit irrigation under furrow irrigation techniques on garlic (Allium sativum L.) productivity at the central highland of Ethiopia","authors":"Biruk Getaneh Ayele ,&nbsp;Shemelies Asseffa ,&nbsp;Abraham Woldemichael Tuhar","doi":"10.1016/j.wen.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Garlic is one of the widely grown vegetables in irrigation but poor irrigation management causes depressed agronomic practices and results in low productivity. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of deficit irrigation on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of garlic (<em>Allium sativum</em> L.) local cultivars under furrow irrigation techniques. It was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications with four irrigation levels (100, 85, 70, and 55% ETc) and three furrow techniques namely: Alternative (AFI), Fixed (FFI) and Conventional (CFI). An irrigation regime was determined based on both ETc and soil moisture methods. All collected data were subjected to ANOVA by SAS statistical software. The result showed that yield and WUE were highly significantly (p &lt; 0.01) affected by deficit levels and furrow techniques. The maximum yield of 8.9 t/ha was obtained with the application of 100% ETc under CFI, while the maximum CWUE of 4.1 kg/m<sup>3</sup> with the application of 55% ETc under AFI. The application of 85% ETc under AFI resulted in optimum yield and CWUE. Correlation analysis revealed that strong positive association between garlic yield and its yield components. In areas where there is abundant water, garlic could be irrigated with a seasonal irrigation depth of 592 mm (100% ETc) under CFI techniques. The application of 85% ETc under AFI techniques saves irrigation water with insignificant yield reduction and this saved water could possibly produce an extra yield of 7.1 t/ha, resulting in a more economical return with a marginal rate of return (MRR) of 1463%. Therefore, it is the best choice under the conditions of the study area and other similar areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101279,"journal":{"name":"Water-Energy Nexus","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 32-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Energy Nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912523000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Garlic is one of the widely grown vegetables in irrigation but poor irrigation management causes depressed agronomic practices and results in low productivity. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of deficit irrigation on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of garlic (Allium sativum L.) local cultivars under furrow irrigation techniques. It was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications with four irrigation levels (100, 85, 70, and 55% ETc) and three furrow techniques namely: Alternative (AFI), Fixed (FFI) and Conventional (CFI). An irrigation regime was determined based on both ETc and soil moisture methods. All collected data were subjected to ANOVA by SAS statistical software. The result showed that yield and WUE were highly significantly (p < 0.01) affected by deficit levels and furrow techniques. The maximum yield of 8.9 t/ha was obtained with the application of 100% ETc under CFI, while the maximum CWUE of 4.1 kg/m3 with the application of 55% ETc under AFI. The application of 85% ETc under AFI resulted in optimum yield and CWUE. Correlation analysis revealed that strong positive association between garlic yield and its yield components. In areas where there is abundant water, garlic could be irrigated with a seasonal irrigation depth of 592 mm (100% ETc) under CFI techniques. The application of 85% ETc under AFI techniques saves irrigation water with insignificant yield reduction and this saved water could possibly produce an extra yield of 7.1 t/ha, resulting in a more economical return with a marginal rate of return (MRR) of 1463%. Therefore, it is the best choice under the conditions of the study area and other similar areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟灌条件下亏缺灌溉对埃塞俄比亚中部高原大蒜产量的影响
大蒜是灌溉中广泛种植的蔬菜之一,但灌溉管理不善会导致农艺实践受挫,导致生产力低下。因此,本研究旨在研究沟灌技术下亏缺灌溉对大蒜(Allium sativum L.)地方品种土壤水分、产量和水分利用效率(WUE)的影响。它是在随机完全块设计(RCBD)中进行的,有三个重复,四个灌溉水平(100、85、70和55%ETc)和三种犁沟技术,即:替代(AFI)、固定(FFI)和常规(CFI)。灌溉制度是根据ETc和土壤水分法确定的。所有收集的数据均通过SAS统计软件进行方差分析。结果表明,亏缺水平和犁沟技术对产量和水分利用效率的影响非常显著(p<0.01)。在CFI下施用100%ETc可获得8.9t/ha的最大产量,而在AFI下施用55%ETc可达到4.1kg/m3的最大CWUE。在AFI条件下施用85%的ETc可获得最佳产量和CWUE。相关分析表明,大蒜产量与其产量构成因素呈正相关。在水资源丰富的地区,可以在CFI技术下以592毫米(100%ETc)的季节性灌溉深度灌溉大蒜。在AFI技术下施用85%的ETc可以节省灌溉用水,但产量下降幅度不大,而且节省的水可能会产生7.1吨/公顷的额外产量,从而产生更经济的回报,边际回报率(MRR)为1463%。因此,它是在研究地区和其他类似地区条件下的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concerns of growing carbon footprint of urban groundwater extraction in India: a case study of Faridabad, Haryana Applying geospatial technique for land suitability assessment for surface irrigation in Shinfa River Basin, Ethiopia Harnessing IoT and advanced analytics for sustainable water quality management A comprehensive analysis, hydrogeochemical characterization and processes controlling surface water quality: entropy-based WQI, geospatial assessment, PIS, NPI, and multivariate approaches in Mahanadi basin, Odisha (India) Decarbonizing Pakistan’s transport sector: insights from water-energy nexus simulation by LEAP-WEAP integrated model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1