Feasibility of teleoperated robotic echocardiography – A pilot study

H. Solvin , S. Sajadi , M. Lippert , R. Massey , H. Holmstrøm , O. Elle , K. Mathiassen , H. Brun
{"title":"Feasibility of teleoperated robotic echocardiography – A pilot study","authors":"H. Solvin ,&nbsp;S. Sajadi ,&nbsp;M. Lippert ,&nbsp;R. Massey ,&nbsp;H. Holmstrøm ,&nbsp;O. Elle ,&nbsp;K. Mathiassen ,&nbsp;H. Brun","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2023.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Echocardiography is dependent on highly specialized healthcare professionals. Teleoperated examinations could provide higher availability of specialized care for patients living in rural areas. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a teleoperated robotic echocardiography system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-three healthy volunteers underwent teleoperated echocardiography, compared to standard bedside echocardiography. Examination time, image quality, ability to assess cardiac structures, measurements of left ventricular fractional shortening and blood flow velocities were compared. Image quality was rated on a scale from 0 to 3.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Approximately 90% of robotically acquired images were rated as medium quality or better and approximately 80% of cardiac structures were evaluated as assessable by at least one evaluator. Mean image quality was lower for robotic (1.6 ± 0.3) compared to standard clinical examinations (2.5 ± 0.4) (p = 0.001). Left ventricular fractional shortening from the robotic examinations was 2.2%, p = 0.160 (absolute value) lower compared to the reference and showed a variation coefficient of 19%. The calculated Doppler insonation angles deviated from the reference by more than 25° for three of four blood flow velocity measurements. The teleoperated examinations had a mean examination time of 26.4 min and were 1.9 times longer compared to the reference (p = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This feasibility study of teleoperated echocardiography shows promising results for the presented system. Clinically satisfactory imaging, particularly measurements of dimension and velocities, requires further development of the system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668323000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Echocardiography is dependent on highly specialized healthcare professionals. Teleoperated examinations could provide higher availability of specialized care for patients living in rural areas. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a teleoperated robotic echocardiography system.

Methods

Twenty-three healthy volunteers underwent teleoperated echocardiography, compared to standard bedside echocardiography. Examination time, image quality, ability to assess cardiac structures, measurements of left ventricular fractional shortening and blood flow velocities were compared. Image quality was rated on a scale from 0 to 3.

Results

Approximately 90% of robotically acquired images were rated as medium quality or better and approximately 80% of cardiac structures were evaluated as assessable by at least one evaluator. Mean image quality was lower for robotic (1.6 ± 0.3) compared to standard clinical examinations (2.5 ± 0.4) (p = 0.001). Left ventricular fractional shortening from the robotic examinations was 2.2%, p = 0.160 (absolute value) lower compared to the reference and showed a variation coefficient of 19%. The calculated Doppler insonation angles deviated from the reference by more than 25° for three of four blood flow velocity measurements. The teleoperated examinations had a mean examination time of 26.4 min and were 1.9 times longer compared to the reference (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

This feasibility study of teleoperated echocardiography shows promising results for the presented system. Clinically satisfactory imaging, particularly measurements of dimension and velocities, requires further development of the system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遥控机器人超声心动图的可行性-一项初步研究
目的超声心动图依赖于高度专业化的医疗保健专业人员。远程手术检查可以为生活在农村地区的患者提供更高的专业护理。本研究的目的是评估远程操作机器人超声心动图系统的可行性。方法对23名健康志愿者进行远程操作超声心动图检查,并与标准床边超声心动图进行比较。比较检查时间、图像质量、评估心脏结构的能力、左心室缩短分数和血流速度的测量结果。图像质量从0到3进行评分。结果大约90%的自动采集图像被评为中等质量或更好,大约80%的心脏结构被至少一名评估者评估为可评估。与标准临床检查(2.5±0.4)相比,机器人检查的平均图像质量较低(1.6±0.3)(p=0.001)。机器人检查的左心室缩短率为2.2%,与参考相比,p=0.160(绝对值)较低,变异系数为19%。对于四次血流速度测量中的三次,计算出的多普勒入射角与参考值的偏差超过25°。远程操作检查的平均检查时间为26.4分钟,比参考值长1.9倍(p=0.001)。结论远程操作超声心动图的可行性研究表明,该系统具有良好的效果。临床上令人满意的成像,特别是尺寸和速度的测量,需要进一步开发该系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Added clinical advantage of combining ultrasound with radiograph in assessing ankle injuries: Comparison with MRI Treatment of inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with focused ultrasound and microbubbles in patients receiving chemotherapy Breast cancer ultrasound image segmentation using improved 3DUnet++ Utilization of evoked vibrational signatures under ultrasound examination as a novel method of tissue classification Protocol refinement and inter- and intra-rater reliability assessment of ultrasound-based measurements of hamstring architecture, and echo intensity, and intra-rater reliability of shear wave elastography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1