Effect of nitrogen management on grain yield of rice grown in a high-yielding environment under flooded and non-flooded conditions

Christopher Proud , Shu Fukai , Brian Dunn , Tina Dunn , Jaquie Mitchell
{"title":"Effect of nitrogen management on grain yield of rice grown in a high-yielding environment under flooded and non-flooded conditions","authors":"Christopher Proud ,&nbsp;Shu Fukai ,&nbsp;Brian Dunn ,&nbsp;Tina Dunn ,&nbsp;Jaquie Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.crope.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With increased cost and scarcity of irrigation water, flooded rice growing system may need to be replaced with water-saving technologies which includes part or complete removal of flooding and to be replaced with non-flooded aerobic conditions. However, to maintain high grain yield equivalent to that achieved with flooded rice, nitrogen (N) management may need to be modified. Experiments were conducted in a high-yielding environment with total N applied up to 180 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup> and three application times to determine its effect on N uptake, grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown under aerobic (AR), delayed permanent water (DPW) and flooded (FD) conditions. Grain yield increased by 3.50–4.50 ​t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> with total N application rate of 180 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup> in AR and 120 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup> in both DPW and FD. Maximum yield was about 10.5, 12.0 and 13.0 ​t ​ha<sup>−1</sup> in AR, DPW and FD, respectively, and the difference was mostly reflected in the grain yield difference obtained under 0 N application. Apparent recovery of fertilised N and agronomic N use efficiency were similar between AR and FD, but DPW took up a higher proportion of N fertiliser applied before commencement of flooding and had slightly higher grain yield response to total N application up to 120 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup>. It is concluded that the limitation for grain yield for rice grown in the AR condition was the crop's inability to take up N from the soil, rather than the inability to take up N fertiliser or to convert the N uptake to grain yield.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100340,"journal":{"name":"Crop and Environment","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X23000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With increased cost and scarcity of irrigation water, flooded rice growing system may need to be replaced with water-saving technologies which includes part or complete removal of flooding and to be replaced with non-flooded aerobic conditions. However, to maintain high grain yield equivalent to that achieved with flooded rice, nitrogen (N) management may need to be modified. Experiments were conducted in a high-yielding environment with total N applied up to 180 ​kg ​ha−1 and three application times to determine its effect on N uptake, grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown under aerobic (AR), delayed permanent water (DPW) and flooded (FD) conditions. Grain yield increased by 3.50–4.50 ​t ha1 with total N application rate of 180 ​kg ​ha−1 in AR and 120 ​kg ​ha−1 in both DPW and FD. Maximum yield was about 10.5, 12.0 and 13.0 ​t ​ha−1 in AR, DPW and FD, respectively, and the difference was mostly reflected in the grain yield difference obtained under 0 N application. Apparent recovery of fertilised N and agronomic N use efficiency were similar between AR and FD, but DPW took up a higher proportion of N fertiliser applied before commencement of flooding and had slightly higher grain yield response to total N application up to 120 ​kg ​ha−1. It is concluded that the limitation for grain yield for rice grown in the AR condition was the crop's inability to take up N from the soil, rather than the inability to take up N fertiliser or to convert the N uptake to grain yield.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氮肥管理对水涝和非水涝高产水稻产量的影响
随着成本的增加和灌溉水的稀缺,可能需要用节水技术取代淹水的水稻种植系统,节水技术包括部分或全部消除淹水,并用非淹水的好氧条件取代。然而,为了保持与淹水水稻相当的高粮食产量,可能需要修改氮管理。实验是在高产环境中进行的,施氮总量高达180​kg​ha−1和三次施用,以确定其对好氧(AR)、延迟永久水(DPW)和淹水(FD)条件下生长的水稻的氮吸收、籽粒产量和籽粒蛋白质含量的影响。粮食产量增加3.50–4.50​t ha−1,总施氮率为180​kg​ha−1在AR和120中​kg​DPW和FD中的ha−1。最大产量分别为10.5、12.0和13.0​t​ha−1在AR、DPW和FD中的差异,并且这种差异主要反映在0 N施用下获得的籽粒产量差异上。施肥氮的表观回收率和农艺氮利用效率在AR和FD之间相似,但DPW在洪水开始前施用的氮肥比例更高,对总施氮的产量响应略高,最高可达120​kg​ha−1。得出的结论是,在AR条件下种植的水稻的粮食产量限制是作物无法从土壤中吸收氮,而不是无法吸收氮肥或将氮吸收转化为粮食产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenotyping genetic advances of wheat under Mediterranean conditions using stable isotopes and high-resolution aerial and satellite multispectral data Different roles of biochar in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields in northern and southern China Root plasticity and nutrient uptake in rainfed lowland rice under nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer management The role of a foliar nitrogen allocation strategy in controlling the CO2 fertilization effect in rice Rice-based cropping systems in Brazil: Irrigated and rainfed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1