Artificial urinary sphincters in males and females and neurogenic patients, techniques, and indications

Ghazal Ameli , Emmanuel Jean Chartier-Kastler , Ralf G. Anding , Frank Van der Aa , Craig V. Comiter , Wilhelm A. Hübner
{"title":"Artificial urinary sphincters in males and females and neurogenic patients, techniques, and indications","authors":"Ghazal Ameli ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Jean Chartier-Kastler ,&nbsp;Ralf G. Anding ,&nbsp;Frank Van der Aa ,&nbsp;Craig V. Comiter ,&nbsp;Wilhelm A. Hübner","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2023.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The introduction of the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in 1972 was heralded as a revolution for the treatment of stress incontinence (Scott et al., 1973). The evolution of the AUS has affected the current surgical options for urinary incontinence. With its unique features, the AUS has been an attractive option for the treatment of urinary incontinence regardless of gender. The device has evolved in the last decades and has now been in routine clinical use for nearly 50 years (Burkhard et al., 2019). Furthermore, the indications and surgical principles involved in its use along with short- and long-term outcomes are more clearly defined. The main indications for AUS insertion are post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI), sphincter weakness incontinence due to neurogenic bladder dysfunction, intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) and rare congenital causes of incontinence. In the following we summarize the conclusions worked out during the expert workshop on artificial urinary sphincter during ICS 2022 in Vienna, Austria; and present some strategies for difficult cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277297452300008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The introduction of the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in 1972 was heralded as a revolution for the treatment of stress incontinence (Scott et al., 1973). The evolution of the AUS has affected the current surgical options for urinary incontinence. With its unique features, the AUS has been an attractive option for the treatment of urinary incontinence regardless of gender. The device has evolved in the last decades and has now been in routine clinical use for nearly 50 years (Burkhard et al., 2019). Furthermore, the indications and surgical principles involved in its use along with short- and long-term outcomes are more clearly defined. The main indications for AUS insertion are post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI), sphincter weakness incontinence due to neurogenic bladder dysfunction, intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) and rare congenital causes of incontinence. In the following we summarize the conclusions worked out during the expert workshop on artificial urinary sphincter during ICS 2022 in Vienna, Austria; and present some strategies for difficult cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性、女性和神经源性患者的人工尿道括约肌,技术和适应症
1972年人工尿道括约肌(AUS)的引入被认为是治疗压力性失禁的一场革命(Scott等人,1973)。AUS的演变影响了目前治疗尿失禁的手术选择。由于其独特的特点,无论性别,AUS都是治疗尿失禁的一个有吸引力的选择。该设备在过去几十年中不断发展,目前已在常规临床使用近50年(Burkhard等人,2019)。此外,它的使用所涉及的适应症和手术原则以及短期和长期结果得到了更明确的定义。AUS插入的主要适应症是前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPI)、神经源性膀胱功能障碍引起的括约肌无力性尿失禁、固有括约肌缺乏症(ISD)和罕见的先天性尿失禁原因。在下文中,我们总结了在奥地利维也纳举行的2022年ICS期间人工尿道括约肌专家研讨会上得出的结论;并针对疑难案件提出一些对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foreword Editorial Foreword Role of videourodynamics, imaging, and cystoscopy in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections: Should we throw in the kitchen sink? Safety and efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter versus male slings in treatment of male urinary incontinence: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1