Outcomes and postoperative management of autologous fascial pubovaginal slings in females who have failed a midurethral sling

Surbhi Agrawal , Maria Smith , Rachael Sussman , Victor Nitti , Nirit Rosenblum , Benoit Peyronnet , Benjamin M. Brucker
{"title":"Outcomes and postoperative management of autologous fascial pubovaginal slings in females who have failed a midurethral sling","authors":"Surbhi Agrawal ,&nbsp;Maria Smith ,&nbsp;Rachael Sussman ,&nbsp;Victor Nitti ,&nbsp;Nirit Rosenblum ,&nbsp;Benoit Peyronnet ,&nbsp;Benjamin M. Brucker","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2023.100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>To describe the outcomes and subsequent postoperative management of autologous fascial pubovaginal slings when used for stress urinary incontinence in women who have failed a prior midurethral sling.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed from 2012 to 2017 at a single center of patients who underwent an autologous fascial pubovaginal sling to correct recurrent stress urinary incontinence after a midurethral sling. Postoperative data was abstracted for three years post-procedure. The outcomes examined were patient-reported symptoms consistent with postoperative stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and/or urinary obstruction. Secondary interventions to manage these postoperative urinary symptoms, and the associated success rates, were also reported.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Fifty-five females underwent an autologous fascial pubovaginal sling placement. Postoperatively, 20% of patients reported persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence symptoms, which were managed with secondary interventions such as sling tightening and urethral bulking successfully. 49% of all patients reported postoperative overactive bladder symptoms, with some noting improvement after overactive bladder medication therapy and others requiring bladder botulinum toxin injection. 16% of patients presented with postoperative urinary obstruction, for which 67% underwent sling incision with resolution of urinary retention in all cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><p>Autologous fascial pubovaginal slings when used as a non-primary surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence can be effective in many cases. However, the management of these women is complex and often requires additional postoperative interventions to address persistent, recurrent, or <em>de novo</em> lower urinary tract symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974523000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the outcomes and subsequent postoperative management of autologous fascial pubovaginal slings when used for stress urinary incontinence in women who have failed a prior midurethral sling.

Methods:

A retrospective review was performed from 2012 to 2017 at a single center of patients who underwent an autologous fascial pubovaginal sling to correct recurrent stress urinary incontinence after a midurethral sling. Postoperative data was abstracted for three years post-procedure. The outcomes examined were patient-reported symptoms consistent with postoperative stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and/or urinary obstruction. Secondary interventions to manage these postoperative urinary symptoms, and the associated success rates, were also reported.

Results:

Fifty-five females underwent an autologous fascial pubovaginal sling placement. Postoperatively, 20% of patients reported persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence symptoms, which were managed with secondary interventions such as sling tightening and urethral bulking successfully. 49% of all patients reported postoperative overactive bladder symptoms, with some noting improvement after overactive bladder medication therapy and others requiring bladder botulinum toxin injection. 16% of patients presented with postoperative urinary obstruction, for which 67% underwent sling incision with resolution of urinary retention in all cases.

Conclusions:

Autologous fascial pubovaginal slings when used as a non-primary surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence can be effective in many cases. However, the management of these women is complex and often requires additional postoperative interventions to address persistent, recurrent, or de novo lower urinary tract symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性尿道中悬吊失败的自体耻骨阴道筋膜悬吊的结果和术后处理
目的:描述自体耻骨阴道筋膜吊带在治疗既往中尿道吊带失败的女性压力性尿失禁时的效果和随后的术后处理。方法:对2012年至2017年在一个单一中心接受自体耻骨阴道筋膜吊带矫正中尿道吊带术后复发性压力性尿失禁的患者进行回顾性审查。术后三年的数据被提取出来。检查的结果是患者报告的与术后压力性尿失禁、膀胱过度活动和/或尿路梗阻一致的症状。还报告了处理这些术后泌尿系统症状的二次干预措施以及相关的成功率。结果:55名女性接受了自体耻骨阴道筋膜悬吊术。术后,20%的患者报告了持续或复发的压力性尿失禁症状,并通过吊带收紧和尿道扩张等二次干预措施成功治疗。49%的患者报告术后膀胱过度活动症状,其中一些患者在膀胱过度活动药物治疗后症状有所改善,另一些患者需要注射膀胱肉毒杆菌毒素。16%的患者出现术后尿路梗阻,其中67%的患者接受了悬带切开术,所有病例的尿潴留都得到了解决。结论:自体耻骨阴道筋膜吊带作为压力性尿失禁的非原发性手术治疗,在许多情况下是有效的。然而,这些女性的管理很复杂,通常需要额外的术后干预措施来解决持续、复发或新发的下尿路症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underweight, dementia, and not being completely independent in bowel management are risk factors for urinary incontinence among older people Diagnosis and treatment of nocturnal enuresis throughout the ages The medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms during the nineteenth century The history of prosthetic devices for postprostatectomy incontinence Female urethroplasty using urethral diverticulum tissue as a graft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1