Integrated impacts of irrigation and nitrogen management for balancing winter wheat yield and greenhouse gas emissions

Hongzheng Shen, Shilei Li, Kexin Sun, Yunhe Gao, Yanxin Liu, Xiaoyi Ma
{"title":"Integrated impacts of irrigation and nitrogen management for balancing winter wheat yield and greenhouse gas emissions","authors":"Hongzheng Shen,&nbsp;Shilei Li,&nbsp;Kexin Sun,&nbsp;Yunhe Gao,&nbsp;Yanxin Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoyi Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.crope.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Irrigation and nitrogen (N) input are effective methods of balancing crop yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effects of irrigation and N management on the GHG emission of winter wheat production systems have not yet been well documented. Therefore, we conducted 2-year field experiments on winter wheat and studied the effects of irrigation and N reduction/replacement on GHG emissions, grain yield, global warming potential (GWP), and GHG emission intensity (GHGI). The winter wheat was irrigated once or twice with 60 or 90 ​mm each time. Five N reduction/replacement treatments were no N application (CK), 25% traditional urea (U) reduction (75%U), traditional U (U), 25% reduction in polymer-coated U (PCU), and 25% reduction in traditional U combined with organic fertilizers (U ​+ ​OM). The results indicated that N reduction/replacement significantly reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, but had no significant effect on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Soil water-filled pore space was the same key factor affecting the emission fluxes of N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub>. Soil temperature significantly affected the fluxes of CH<sub>4</sub> (P ​&lt; ​0.001). Irrigation treatment did not exhibit a significant effect on grain yield, but high irrigation input increased the GWP and GHGI. Compared with U, the grain yield of CK, 75%U, PCU, and U ​+ ​OM increased by −46%, −9.2%, −1.8%, and 5.4%, respectively; GWP decreased by 35.9%, 11.6%, 7.3%, and 2.7%, respectively; and GHGI decreased by −22.1%, 3.1%, 6.0%, and 8.0%, respectively. Therefore, sustainable production goals of increasing grain yield and reducing GHG emissions were achieved with N reduction/replacement using U + OM and low irrigation input of 60 ​mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100340,"journal":{"name":"Crop and Environment","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 126-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X23000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrigation and nitrogen (N) input are effective methods of balancing crop yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effects of irrigation and N management on the GHG emission of winter wheat production systems have not yet been well documented. Therefore, we conducted 2-year field experiments on winter wheat and studied the effects of irrigation and N reduction/replacement on GHG emissions, grain yield, global warming potential (GWP), and GHG emission intensity (GHGI). The winter wheat was irrigated once or twice with 60 or 90 ​mm each time. Five N reduction/replacement treatments were no N application (CK), 25% traditional urea (U) reduction (75%U), traditional U (U), 25% reduction in polymer-coated U (PCU), and 25% reduction in traditional U combined with organic fertilizers (U ​+ ​OM). The results indicated that N reduction/replacement significantly reduced N2O emissions, but had no significant effect on CH4 emissions. Soil water-filled pore space was the same key factor affecting the emission fluxes of N2O and CH4. Soil temperature significantly affected the fluxes of CH4 (P ​< ​0.001). Irrigation treatment did not exhibit a significant effect on grain yield, but high irrigation input increased the GWP and GHGI. Compared with U, the grain yield of CK, 75%U, PCU, and U ​+ ​OM increased by −46%, −9.2%, −1.8%, and 5.4%, respectively; GWP decreased by 35.9%, 11.6%, 7.3%, and 2.7%, respectively; and GHGI decreased by −22.1%, 3.1%, 6.0%, and 8.0%, respectively. Therefore, sustainable production goals of increasing grain yield and reducing GHG emissions were achieved with N reduction/replacement using U + OM and low irrigation input of 60 ​mm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灌溉和氮肥管理对冬小麦产量和温室气体排放平衡的综合影响
灌溉和氮输入是平衡作物产量和温室气体排放的有效方法。然而,灌溉和氮管理对冬小麦生产系统温室气体排放的影响尚未得到充分的证明。因此,我们对冬小麦进行了为期2年的田间试验,研究了灌溉和减氮/置换对温室气体排放、粮食产量、全球变暖潜能值(GWP)和温室气体排放强度(GHGI)的影响。冬小麦用60或90灌溉一到两次​mm。五个减氮/替代处理分别是不施氮(CK)、传统尿素(U)减少25%(75%U)、传统U(U)、聚合物包膜U减少25%(PCU)和传统U与有机肥料联合减少25%(U​+​OM)。结果表明,氮的减少/置换显著降低了N2O的排放,但对CH4的排放没有显著影响。土壤充水孔隙空间是影响N2O和CH4排放通量的关键因素。土壤温度显著影响CH4(P​<;​0.001)。灌溉处理对粮食产量没有显著影响,但高灌溉投入增加了GWP和GHGI。与U相比,CK、75%U、PCU和U的籽粒产量​+​OM分别增加了−46%、−9.2%、−1.8%和5.4%;全球升温潜能值分别下降了35.9%、11.6%、7.3%和2.7%;GHGI分别下降了−22.1%、3.1%、6.0%和8.0%。因此,通过使用U+OM和60的低灌溉投入减少/替代氮,实现了提高粮食产量和减少温室气体排放的可持续生产目标​毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Increasing seedling number alleviates the adverse effects of warming on grain yield and reduces greenhouse gas emission in late-season rice Foliar uniconazole application increases rice lodging resistance by altering stem morphological and anatomical traits Publisher's Note Light condition during grain-filling stage of main crop strongly influences ratooning ability of low-stubble ratoon rice A comparative assessment of polymer-coated and non-coated urea in direct-seeded rice: agronomic, economic, and environmental performance and sensitivity analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1