Differences in ultrasound elevational beam width (slice thickness) between popular handheld devices

Harm J. Scholten , Gert Weijers , Marco de Wild , Hendrikus H.M. Korsten , Chris L. de Korte , R. Arthur Bouwman
{"title":"Differences in ultrasound elevational beam width (slice thickness) between popular handheld devices","authors":"Harm J. Scholten ,&nbsp;Gert Weijers ,&nbsp;Marco de Wild ,&nbsp;Hendrikus H.M. Korsten ,&nbsp;Chris L. de Korte ,&nbsp;R. Arthur Bouwman","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2023.100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Handheld ultrasound devices are increasingly used by medical professionals for bedside ultrasound-guided interventions. Especially for vascular access procedures, the width of the imaging plane, known as the slice thickness or elevational beam width is a prominent source for misinterpretation. A wide slice thickness can lead to the interpretation that 2 objects (i.e. needle and vessel) are on the same plane while in fact they are not and thereby negatively influencing the performance of in-plane ultrasound-guided interventions. Therefore, the beam profiles of three popular handheld US devices are tested and compared to a conventional US device.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The GE VScan, Philips Lumify and Butterfly IQ ​+ ​are tested using a slice phantom to determine the slice thickness. For comparison, a Philips Affiniti machine was investigated. Both linear and curved array settings were analyzed. In a slice phantom, a diffuse scattering plane at an angle of exactly 45° is scanned. For each imaging depth, the vertical height of the imaged rectangle corresponds to the slice thickness at that depth.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>For the linear array transducers, the focus depth ranges from 1.5 to 3.5 cm. At the focus depth, all transducers have a reasonable slice thickness of approximately 1 mm. More superficially, the slice thickness varies between 1 and 4 mm. The curved array probes have larger focus depths, ranging from 2.7 to 7.3 cm. The slice thickness at focus depth varies between 1.4 and 3.8 mm, but at 2 cm depth is even more than 5 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The slice thickness of handheld ultrasound transducers varies between the different devices, and can be suboptimal for superficial in-plane ultrasound-guided interventions. The larger slice thickness of the curved array settings may complicate in-plane guidance. Handheld ultrasound users should be aware of the beam characteristics of their devices to optimize guidance for interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668323000095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Handheld ultrasound devices are increasingly used by medical professionals for bedside ultrasound-guided interventions. Especially for vascular access procedures, the width of the imaging plane, known as the slice thickness or elevational beam width is a prominent source for misinterpretation. A wide slice thickness can lead to the interpretation that 2 objects (i.e. needle and vessel) are on the same plane while in fact they are not and thereby negatively influencing the performance of in-plane ultrasound-guided interventions. Therefore, the beam profiles of three popular handheld US devices are tested and compared to a conventional US device.

Methods

The GE VScan, Philips Lumify and Butterfly IQ ​+ ​are tested using a slice phantom to determine the slice thickness. For comparison, a Philips Affiniti machine was investigated. Both linear and curved array settings were analyzed. In a slice phantom, a diffuse scattering plane at an angle of exactly 45° is scanned. For each imaging depth, the vertical height of the imaged rectangle corresponds to the slice thickness at that depth.

Main results

For the linear array transducers, the focus depth ranges from 1.5 to 3.5 cm. At the focus depth, all transducers have a reasonable slice thickness of approximately 1 mm. More superficially, the slice thickness varies between 1 and 4 mm. The curved array probes have larger focus depths, ranging from 2.7 to 7.3 cm. The slice thickness at focus depth varies between 1.4 and 3.8 mm, but at 2 cm depth is even more than 5 mm.

Conclusions

The slice thickness of handheld ultrasound transducers varies between the different devices, and can be suboptimal for superficial in-plane ultrasound-guided interventions. The larger slice thickness of the curved array settings may complicate in-plane guidance. Handheld ultrasound users should be aware of the beam characteristics of their devices to optimize guidance for interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行的手持设备之间超声抬高波束宽度(切片厚度)的差异
背景医疗专业人员越来越多地使用手持超声设备进行床边超声引导干预。特别是对于血管通路程序,成像平面的宽度,即切片厚度或仰角波束宽度,是误解的主要来源。较宽的切片厚度可能导致2个物体(即针头和血管)在同一平面上,而事实上它们不在同一个平面上,从而对平面内超声引导干预的性能产生负面影响。因此,测试了三种流行的手持US设备的波束轮廓,并将其与传统US设备进行了比较。方法GE VScan、Philips Lumify和Butterfly IQ​+​使用切片体模进行测试以确定切片厚度。为了进行比较,对Philips Affiniti机器进行了研究。分析了线性和弯曲阵列设置。在切片体模中,扫描角度正好为45°的漫散射平面。对于每个成像深度,成像矩形的垂直高度对应于该深度处的切片厚度。主要结果对于线性阵列换能器,聚焦深度范围为1.5至3.5厘米。在聚焦深度下,所有换能器的合理切片厚度约为1毫米。从表面上看,切片厚度在1到4mm之间变化。弯曲阵列探头具有更大的聚焦深度,范围从2.7到7.3厘米。聚焦深度处的切片厚度在1.4到3.8毫米之间变化,但在2厘米深度处甚至超过5毫米。结论手持超声换能器的切片厚度因不同设备而异,对于浅表面内超声引导干预来说可能是次优的。弯曲阵列设置的较大切片厚度可能使平面内引导复杂化。手持超声波用户应了解其设备的波束特性,以优化干预指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Added clinical advantage of combining ultrasound with radiograph in assessing ankle injuries: Comparison with MRI Treatment of inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with focused ultrasound and microbubbles in patients receiving chemotherapy Breast cancer ultrasound image segmentation using improved 3DUnet++ Utilization of evoked vibrational signatures under ultrasound examination as a novel method of tissue classification Protocol refinement and inter- and intra-rater reliability assessment of ultrasound-based measurements of hamstring architecture, and echo intensity, and intra-rater reliability of shear wave elastography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1