The performance effects of optimistic and pessimistic project status reporting behavior

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102514
Carsten Kaufmann, Alexander Kock
{"title":"The performance effects of optimistic and pessimistic project status reporting behavior","authors":"Carsten Kaufmann,&nbsp;Alexander Kock","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Project managers often provide project status reviews in an aggregate overall status to convey central project status information to project steering committees. While the simplicity of this reporting form is potentially helpful for decision-makers, it is also prone to biases because the assessment is subjective, and project managers might intentionally misreport the current status. We investigate the impact of this optimistic and pessimistic reporting behavior on projects’ future performance using a sample of 46,474 project status reports from 1,229 projects. Surprisingly, and in contrast to previous research, the results suggest that optimistic reporting behavior is positively related to future project success and pessimistic behavior negatively. We further find that the positive and negative effects of reporting behavior diminish throughout a project and that reinforced behavior over time negatively affects the impact of both behavior types. This study is highly relevant to managers as it reveals that project managers’ subjective presentation of their project's status has a significant relationship with their project's future performance. Furthermore, the study's results surprisingly show that—depending on a project's current phase and its managers’ prior reporting behavior—optimistic and pessimistic reporting can have negative and positive consequences for projects’ future performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"41 7","pages":"Article 102514"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323000789","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Project managers often provide project status reviews in an aggregate overall status to convey central project status information to project steering committees. While the simplicity of this reporting form is potentially helpful for decision-makers, it is also prone to biases because the assessment is subjective, and project managers might intentionally misreport the current status. We investigate the impact of this optimistic and pessimistic reporting behavior on projects’ future performance using a sample of 46,474 project status reports from 1,229 projects. Surprisingly, and in contrast to previous research, the results suggest that optimistic reporting behavior is positively related to future project success and pessimistic behavior negatively. We further find that the positive and negative effects of reporting behavior diminish throughout a project and that reinforced behavior over time negatively affects the impact of both behavior types. This study is highly relevant to managers as it reveals that project managers’ subjective presentation of their project's status has a significant relationship with their project's future performance. Furthermore, the study's results surprisingly show that—depending on a project's current phase and its managers’ prior reporting behavior—optimistic and pessimistic reporting can have negative and positive consequences for projects’ future performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乐观和悲观的项目状态报告行为对绩效的影响
项目经理通常提供总体状态的项目状态审查,以向项目指导委员会传达中心项目状态信息。虽然这种报告形式的简单性可能有助于决策者,但它也容易产生偏见,因为评估是主观的,项目经理可能会故意误报当前状态。我们使用1229个项目的46474份项目状态报告样本,调查了这种乐观和悲观的报告行为对项目未来绩效的影响。令人惊讶的是,与之前的研究相反,研究结果表明,乐观的报告行为与未来项目成功呈正相关,而悲观的行为与未来的项目成功呈负相关。我们进一步发现,报告行为的积极和消极影响在整个项目中都会减少,而随着时间的推移,强化行为会对这两种行为类型的影响产生负面影响。这项研究与管理者高度相关,因为它揭示了项目经理对项目状态的主观陈述与项目未来的绩效有着显著的关系。此外,该研究的结果令人惊讶地表明,根据项目的当前阶段及其管理者之前的报告行为,乐观和悲观的报告可能会对项目的未来表现产生负面和积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Struggling with strategizing in public client organisations: Managing strategic projects in inter-organisational contexts Projects as drivers of sustainability: How the adoption of the reuse principle affects the front-end of a construction project Dynamics of multi-level programme integration in a strategic programme: The case of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1