Neither a descriptive narrative of the past nor an un-reflexive account of its production should guide us

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102528
Stewart Clegg
{"title":"Neither a descriptive narrative of the past nor an un-reflexive account of its production should guide us","authors":"Stewart Clegg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>“Neither a descriptive narrative of the past nor an un-reflexive account of its production should guide us” is a critique of the lack of either theoretical or policy direction contained in the paper titled “The past will guide us”. What is at issue is the atheoretical accounting of the past through the reliance on a simple account of its representation by the keywords used in the IJPM and the non-accounting of a focus group held with the editors of the journal. The future of project management will not be sustainable if it is to be developed on these atheoretical foundations of method and a policy premised on ‘looking back’. The field needs theory, and it needs to be part of a future attuned to the attainment of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (https://sdgs.un.org/goals).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"41 7","pages":"Article 102528"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323000923","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Neither a descriptive narrative of the past nor an un-reflexive account of its production should guide us” is a critique of the lack of either theoretical or policy direction contained in the paper titled “The past will guide us”. What is at issue is the atheoretical accounting of the past through the reliance on a simple account of its representation by the keywords used in the IJPM and the non-accounting of a focus group held with the editors of the journal. The future of project management will not be sustainable if it is to be developed on these atheoretical foundations of method and a policy premised on ‘looking back’. The field needs theory, and it needs to be part of a future attuned to the attainment of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (https://sdgs.un.org/goals).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无论是对过去的描述性叙述,还是对其产生的非反身性描述,都不应该指导我们
“无论是对过去的描述性叙述,还是对其产生的非反射性描述,都不应该指导我们”,这是对题为“过去将指导我们”的论文中缺乏理论或政策方向的批评。争论的焦点是过去的理论核算,它依赖于对其由IJPM中使用的关键词表示的简单描述,以及与期刊编辑一起举行的焦点小组的不核算。如果项目管理要建立在这些方法的理论基础和以“回头看”为前提的政策之上,那么它的未来将是不可持续的。该领域需要理论,它需要成为与实现联合国可持续发展目标相适应的未来的一部分(https://sdgs.un.org/goals)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Struggling with strategizing in public client organisations: Managing strategic projects in inter-organisational contexts Projects as drivers of sustainability: How the adoption of the reuse principle affects the front-end of a construction project Dynamics of multi-level programme integration in a strategic programme: The case of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1