Environmental and energy impacts of battery electric and conventional vehicles: A study in Sweden under recycling scenarios

Sahar Safarian
{"title":"Environmental and energy impacts of battery electric and conventional vehicles: A study in Sweden under recycling scenarios","authors":"Sahar Safarian","doi":"10.1016/j.jfueco.2022.100083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electromobility is the future main system for Swedish road transport that encourage sustainable urban transportation. However, emission impacts of applying electric vehicles (EVs) are currently controversial. This study evaluates and compares internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) refer to both petrol and diesel-based engines and BEVs, focusing on environmental and energy impacts. The entire life cycle of vehicles production, fuel production and fuel use are considered and life cycle emissions impacts due to various electricity generation alternatives will be studied. LCA of BEV is also conducted under different recycling scenarios to determine what extent CO<sub>2</sub> can be further reduced owing to car and battery recycling. The results show that BEVs charged by natural-gas, and renewable electricity produce less emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, PM, VOCs, NO<sub>X</sub> and Sb than ICEVs but higher PO<sub>4</sub> emissions and need more energy. The largest fraction of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for BEVs charged via renewable electricity is due to vehicle production (61-78% of BEV's life cycle CO<sub>2</sub> emissions). CO<sub>2</sub> emissions regarding to vehicle production for BEVs is 14.6 ton (60.8 gCO<sub>2</sub>/km) which is 132% and 123% of that for petrol and diesel ICEVs, respectively. Human toxicity and eutrophication impacts highlight as potentially important categories for transition from ICEVs to BEVs due to high toxicity and PO<sub>4</sub> emissions in BEV production. By applying high scenario for car and battery recycling, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in BEVs lifespan charged by renewable electricity can be reduced 50% (83 gCO<sub>2</sub>/km); total PO<sub>4</sub> emissions can be also decreased 56% with production of 79 mgPO<sub>4</sub>/km.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100556,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Communications","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052022000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Electromobility is the future main system for Swedish road transport that encourage sustainable urban transportation. However, emission impacts of applying electric vehicles (EVs) are currently controversial. This study evaluates and compares internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) refer to both petrol and diesel-based engines and BEVs, focusing on environmental and energy impacts. The entire life cycle of vehicles production, fuel production and fuel use are considered and life cycle emissions impacts due to various electricity generation alternatives will be studied. LCA of BEV is also conducted under different recycling scenarios to determine what extent CO2 can be further reduced owing to car and battery recycling. The results show that BEVs charged by natural-gas, and renewable electricity produce less emissions of CO2, SO2, PM, VOCs, NOX and Sb than ICEVs but higher PO4 emissions and need more energy. The largest fraction of CO2 emissions for BEVs charged via renewable electricity is due to vehicle production (61-78% of BEV's life cycle CO2 emissions). CO2 emissions regarding to vehicle production for BEVs is 14.6 ton (60.8 gCO2/km) which is 132% and 123% of that for petrol and diesel ICEVs, respectively. Human toxicity and eutrophication impacts highlight as potentially important categories for transition from ICEVs to BEVs due to high toxicity and PO4 emissions in BEV production. By applying high scenario for car and battery recycling, CO2 emissions in BEVs lifespan charged by renewable electricity can be reduced 50% (83 gCO2/km); total PO4 emissions can be also decreased 56% with production of 79 mgPO4/km.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电池电动汽车和传统汽车对环境和能源的影响:瑞典在回收情景下的一项研究
电动汽车是瑞典未来道路交通的主要系统,鼓励可持续的城市交通。然而,应用电动汽车的排放影响目前存在争议。本研究评估并比较了内燃机车(ICEV),即汽油和柴油发动机以及纯电动汽车,重点关注环境和能源影响。考虑了车辆生产、燃料生产和燃料使用的整个生命周期,并将研究各种发电替代方案对生命周期排放的影响。纯电动汽车的生命周期评价也在不同的回收场景下进行,以确定由于汽车和电池的回收,二氧化碳可以在多大程度上进一步减少。结果表明,用天然气和可再生电力充电的纯电动汽车产生的CO2、SO2、PM、VOCs、NOX和Sb排放量比内燃机汽车少,但PO4排放量更高,需要更多的能源。通过可再生电力充电的纯电动汽车的二氧化碳排放量最大的部分是由于车辆生产(纯电动汽车生命周期二氧化碳排放量的61-78%)。纯电动汽车车辆生产的二氧化碳排放量为14.6吨(60.8克二氧化碳/公里),分别为汽油和柴油内燃机车的132%和123%。由于纯电动汽车生产中的高毒性和PO4排放,人类毒性和富营养化影响凸显为从ICEV向纯电动汽车过渡的潜在重要类别。通过应用汽车和电池回收的高场景,可再生电力充电的纯电动汽车寿命中的二氧化碳排放量可以减少50%(83 gCO2/km);总PO4排放量也可以减少56%,产量为79mgPO4/km。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biofuel in Ghana: Potentials and strategies for policy implementation Chemical agents for enhanced oil recovery: A comparison of a switchable hydrophilic solvent and deep eutectic solvent Properties and Autoignition reactivity of diesel boiling range ethers produced from Guerbet alcohols Assessment of potential sites for biogas production plants from domestic, agricultural, and livestock waste Effects of difference in heating sources on ammonia reactivity: Possibility for photolysis-assisted ammonia combustion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1