Initial Multicenter Experience of Traction Wire Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2022.10.002
Abel Joseph , Michel Kahaleh , Andrew A. Li , Gregory B. Haber , Prashant Kedia , Mai Ego Makiguchi , Neil R. Sharma , Joo Ha Hwang , Amitabh Chak , Ahmad M. Al-Taee , David Braun , Shaffer Mok , Neal A. Mehta , Emre Gorgun , John Vargo , Seiichiro Abe , Yutaka Saito , Tyler Stevens , Amit Bhatt
{"title":"Initial Multicenter Experience of Traction Wire Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection","authors":"Abel Joseph ,&nbsp;Michel Kahaleh ,&nbsp;Andrew A. Li ,&nbsp;Gregory B. Haber ,&nbsp;Prashant Kedia ,&nbsp;Mai Ego Makiguchi ,&nbsp;Neil R. Sharma ,&nbsp;Joo Ha Hwang ,&nbsp;Amitabh Chak ,&nbsp;Ahmad M. Al-Taee ,&nbsp;David Braun ,&nbsp;Shaffer Mok ,&nbsp;Neal A. Mehta ,&nbsp;Emre Gorgun ,&nbsp;John Vargo ,&nbsp;Seiichiro Abe ,&nbsp;Yutaka Saito ,&nbsp;Tyler Stevens ,&nbsp;Amit Bhatt","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically challenging and time-consuming procedure. A major limitation of ESD is the lack of a “second hand” to provide traction. We have developed a novel retraction device, a traction wire (TW), for ESD. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of TW-ESD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We initially evaluated TW-ESD in a randomized live pig study. After the device was approved for clinical use, we used it in patients<span> undergoing ESD at 8 academic centers in the United States and Japan. Data on demographics, procedural performance, histopathology, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed retrospectively.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Porcine study: In total, 12 ESDs were performed in random order in 3 live pigs. ESDs performed with TW had significantly shorter submucosal dissection time (7.0 ± 1.9 minutes vs 18.3 ± 3.4 minutes; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and shorter total ESD time (21.5 ± 4.1 minutes vs 29.5 ± 7.7 minutes; <em>P</em><span>= 0.049). TW was successfully deployed in all 103 study patients. The median device deployment time was 2 minutes (2, 3.0), and the median procedure time was 100.5 (65.50, 175.75) minutes. En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 98.1% (101/103) and 90.29% (93/103), respectively. The median ease of deployment and retrieval of the device on a 100-mm visual analog scale was 100 (80, 100). The median degree to which the device improved ease of procedure was 90 (77.5, 100). No adverse events related to the TW were seen.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The TW device was safe and efficient to use in ESD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030722000770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically challenging and time-consuming procedure. A major limitation of ESD is the lack of a “second hand” to provide traction. We have developed a novel retraction device, a traction wire (TW), for ESD. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of TW-ESD.

Methods

We initially evaluated TW-ESD in a randomized live pig study. After the device was approved for clinical use, we used it in patients undergoing ESD at 8 academic centers in the United States and Japan. Data on demographics, procedural performance, histopathology, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Porcine study: In total, 12 ESDs were performed in random order in 3 live pigs. ESDs performed with TW had significantly shorter submucosal dissection time (7.0 ± 1.9 minutes vs 18.3 ± 3.4 minutes; P < 0.001) and shorter total ESD time (21.5 ± 4.1 minutes vs 29.5 ± 7.7 minutes; P= 0.049). TW was successfully deployed in all 103 study patients. The median device deployment time was 2 minutes (2, 3.0), and the median procedure time was 100.5 (65.50, 175.75) minutes. En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 98.1% (101/103) and 90.29% (93/103), respectively. The median ease of deployment and retrieval of the device on a 100-mm visual analog scale was 100 (80, 100). The median degree to which the device improved ease of procedure was 90 (77.5, 100). No adverse events related to the TW were seen.

Conclusion

The TW device was safe and efficient to use in ESD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牵引丝内镜粘膜下剥离术的多中心初步经验
背景和目的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一项技术上具有挑战性且耗时的手术。ESD的一个主要限制是缺乏提供牵引力的“二手车”。我们已经开发了一种新型的回缩装置,牵引线(TW),用于ESD。本研究旨在评估TW-ESD的疗效、安全性和有效性。方法我们在一项随机的生猪研究中初步评估了TW-ESD。在该设备被批准用于临床后,我们在美国和日本的8个学术中心将其用于ESD患者。对人口统计学、手术表现、组织病理学和临床随访的数据进行回顾性收集和分析。结果猪实验:共对3头生猪随机进行了12次ESD。使用TW进行的ESD具有显著更短的粘膜下剥离时间(7.0±1.9分钟vs 18.3±3.4分钟;P<;0.001)和更短的ESD总时间(21.5±4.1分钟vs 29.5±7.7分钟;P=0.049)。在所有103名研究患者中成功部署了TW。装置部署时间中位数为2分钟(2.30),手术时间中位数为100.5分钟(65.50175.75)。整体切除率和R0切除率分别为98.1%(101/103)和90.29%(93/103)。在100毫米视觉模拟量表上,该装置的部署和收回的中位容易程度为100(80100)。该装置改善手术简易性的中位程度为90(77.5100)。未发现与TW相关的不良事件。结论TW装置用于ESD是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1