Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: A Literature Review of the Past, Present, and Future Directions

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2023.03.002
Saam Dilmaghani, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu
{"title":"Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: A Literature Review of the Past, Present, and Future Directions","authors":"Saam Dilmaghani,&nbsp;Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Colonoscopy remains one of the most common procedures performed by gastroenterologists and is critical for early detection and management of precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC). Although CRC remains one of the deadliest </span>malignancies, earlier detection of precancerous polyps is directly associated with increased patient survival. As such, quality metrics for colonoscopy, such as polyp detection and mucosal visualization, are key parameters that are directly tied to patient outcomes. Over the past 2 decades, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) tools have been tested and developed to augment colonoscopy performance and in 2021 resulted in the first-ever FDA-approved computer-aided detection (CADe) tool. This narrative review begins by reviewing the evidence behind the use of CADe that led to FDA approval. Next, the review discusses the current evidence and technological approaches for computer-aided diagnosis for optical in situ histopathological differentiation of </span>colorectal polyps<span><span><span>, including narrow-band imaging, blue light imaging, and endocytoscopy. Studies are ongoing to develop systems to predict the depth of submucosal invasion and to assess endoscopic disease activity among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The applications of AI/ML to quality improvement are explored, including real-time assessment of </span>bowel preparation<span>, detection of cecal intubation, and automated polyp reporting and surveillance recommendations using natural language processing. Despite initial cost concerns, models have suggested that CADe systems could result in long-term cost savings and are generally accepted by patients and gastroenterologists. There is some reservation in adopting computer-aided diagnosis systems among gastroenterologists due to medico-legal concerns. Future directions for AI/ML in colonoscopy include </span></span>health system improvements, such as automating note writing, optimizing procedural scheduling, and predicting sedation needs.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colonoscopy remains one of the most common procedures performed by gastroenterologists and is critical for early detection and management of precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC). Although CRC remains one of the deadliest malignancies, earlier detection of precancerous polyps is directly associated with increased patient survival. As such, quality metrics for colonoscopy, such as polyp detection and mucosal visualization, are key parameters that are directly tied to patient outcomes. Over the past 2 decades, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) tools have been tested and developed to augment colonoscopy performance and in 2021 resulted in the first-ever FDA-approved computer-aided detection (CADe) tool. This narrative review begins by reviewing the evidence behind the use of CADe that led to FDA approval. Next, the review discusses the current evidence and technological approaches for computer-aided diagnosis for optical in situ histopathological differentiation of colorectal polyps, including narrow-band imaging, blue light imaging, and endocytoscopy. Studies are ongoing to develop systems to predict the depth of submucosal invasion and to assess endoscopic disease activity among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The applications of AI/ML to quality improvement are explored, including real-time assessment of bowel preparation, detection of cecal intubation, and automated polyp reporting and surveillance recommendations using natural language processing. Despite initial cost concerns, models have suggested that CADe systems could result in long-term cost savings and are generally accepted by patients and gastroenterologists. There is some reservation in adopting computer-aided diagnosis systems among gastroenterologists due to medico-legal concerns. Future directions for AI/ML in colonoscopy include health system improvements, such as automating note writing, optimizing procedural scheduling, and predicting sedation needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在结肠镜检查中的作用:过去、现在和未来方向的文献综述
结肠镜检查仍然是胃肠病学家最常见的手术之一,对于结直肠癌癌症(CRC)前体的早期检测和管理至关重要。尽管CRC仍然是最致命的恶性肿瘤之一,但早期发现癌前息肉与患者生存率的提高直接相关。因此,结肠镜检查的质量指标,如息肉检测和粘膜可视化,是与患者结果直接相关的关键参数。在过去的20年里,人工智能和机器学习(AI/ML)工具经过测试和开发,以提高结肠镜检查的性能,并于2021年推出了首个美国食品药品监督管理局批准的计算机辅助检测(CADe)工具。本叙述性审查从审查CADe使用背后的证据开始,这些证据导致了美国食品药品监督管理局的批准。接下来,该综述讨论了计算机辅助诊断结肠息肉光学原位组织病理学分化的最新证据和技术方法,包括窄带成像、蓝光成像和内吞镜检查。目前正在进行研究,以开发预测炎症性肠病患者黏膜下侵袭深度和评估内镜疾病活动的系统。探讨了AI/ML在质量改进中的应用,包括肠道准备的实时评估、盲肠插管的检测,以及使用自然语言处理的息肉自动报告和监测建议。尽管最初存在成本问题,但模型表明,CADe系统可以长期节省成本,并被患者和胃肠病学家普遍接受。出于医学和法律方面的考虑,胃肠病学家对采用计算机辅助诊断系统有一些保留。结肠镜检查中AI/ML的未来方向包括健康系统的改进,如自动化笔记书写、优化程序安排和预测镇静需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1