Augmented reality smart glasses use and acceptance: Α literature review

George Koutromanos , Georgia Kazakou
{"title":"Augmented reality smart glasses use and acceptance: Α literature review","authors":"George Koutromanos ,&nbsp;Georgia Kazakou","doi":"10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The research interest in the use of augmented reality smart glasses (ARSGs) has increased dramatically in recent years as they are utilised in many fields such as medicine and industry, as well as everyday life. This study aims to review the empirical research activity concerning the acceptance of ARSGs in all applicable fields. In total, 21 studies published from 2015 to 2022 have been reviewed. Their relative field, theoretical framework, methodological design, and the factors that were found to affect the acceptance or use of ARSGs were recorded. It was found that the research focuses more on users acting as consumers of the glasses than on professionals (e.g., doctors, teachers, athletes) using them in a specific field. Also, the majority of the studies base their theoretical framework either entirely or in part on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Moreover, the research models of these studies extend TAM by using various additional variables, such as privacy risk and external influence. Methodologically speaking, most of the studies follow the quantitative approach, without giving the participants the opportunity to interact with the glasses. In addition, the factors which were found to influence the acceptance or use of the glasses are varied and can be categorised as utilitarian, social, personal, risk-related, and technological. This review adds value to the theory of technology acceptance. This is because it is one of the first to address the acceptance or use of ARSGs. Since there is no acceptance model for ARSGs, the findings of this review could lead researchers to propose models for accepting ARSGs in various fields, such as education<em>.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100320,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education: X Reality","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education: X Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949678023000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The research interest in the use of augmented reality smart glasses (ARSGs) has increased dramatically in recent years as they are utilised in many fields such as medicine and industry, as well as everyday life. This study aims to review the empirical research activity concerning the acceptance of ARSGs in all applicable fields. In total, 21 studies published from 2015 to 2022 have been reviewed. Their relative field, theoretical framework, methodological design, and the factors that were found to affect the acceptance or use of ARSGs were recorded. It was found that the research focuses more on users acting as consumers of the glasses than on professionals (e.g., doctors, teachers, athletes) using them in a specific field. Also, the majority of the studies base their theoretical framework either entirely or in part on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Moreover, the research models of these studies extend TAM by using various additional variables, such as privacy risk and external influence. Methodologically speaking, most of the studies follow the quantitative approach, without giving the participants the opportunity to interact with the glasses. In addition, the factors which were found to influence the acceptance or use of the glasses are varied and can be categorised as utilitarian, social, personal, risk-related, and technological. This review adds value to the theory of technology acceptance. This is because it is one of the first to address the acceptance or use of ARSGs. Since there is no acceptance model for ARSGs, the findings of this review could lead researchers to propose models for accepting ARSGs in various fields, such as education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强现实智能眼镜的使用和接受:Α文献综述
近年来,随着增强现实智能眼镜在医学、工业以及日常生活等许多领域的应用,人们对增强现实智能玻璃的研究兴趣急剧增加。本研究旨在回顾所有适用领域中关于接受ARSG的实证研究活动。对2015年至2022年发表的21项研究进行了综述。记录了它们的相关领域、理论框架、方法设计以及影响ARSG接受或使用的因素。研究发现,这项研究更多地关注作为眼镜消费者的用户,而不是在特定领域使用眼镜的专业人员(如医生、教师、运动员)。此外,大多数研究的理论框架完全或部分基于技术接受模型(TAM)。此外,这些研究的研究模型通过使用各种附加变量,如隐私风险和外部影响,扩展了TAM。从方法论上讲,大多数研究都遵循定量方法,没有给参与者与眼镜互动的机会。此外,影响眼镜接受或使用的因素多种多样,可分为实用性、社会性、个人性、风险相关和技术性。这篇综述为技术接受理论增加了价值。这是因为它是首批解决ARSG的接受或使用问题的公司之一。由于没有ARSG的接受模型,这篇综述的发现可能会引导研究人员提出在教育等各个领域接受ARSG的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhanced education on geology by 3D interactive virtual geological scenes Using virtual reality mediation in a workplace setting for employees with disabilities: A pilot study Building ethical virtual classrooms: Confucian perspectives on avatars and VR Perception of head shape, texture fidelity and head orientation of the instructor’s look-alike avatar Using cospaces in augmented reality digital story creation: A thematic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1