Exergy and environmental assessments of the performance of a molten carbonate fuel cell cogeneration plant: External steam reforming against internal steam reforming

Ata Chitsaz , Sajed Hadi Bafekr , Shahriyar Ghazanfari Holagh
{"title":"Exergy and environmental assessments of the performance of a molten carbonate fuel cell cogeneration plant: External steam reforming against internal steam reforming","authors":"Ata Chitsaz ,&nbsp;Sajed Hadi Bafekr ,&nbsp;Shahriyar Ghazanfari Holagh","doi":"10.1016/j.jfueco.2023.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two different configurations of a system including a cogeneration plant based on molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) with internal steam reforming (IR-MCFC) and external steam reforming (ER-MCFC) for producing power and hot water are modeled and investigated thermodynamically. Energetic, exergetic and environmental analyses are performed for the proposed systems and compared with each other from different viewpoints. Effects of various parameters, namely after-burner emissions recycling, fuel utilization ratio, operating temperature of stack and current density are investigated on the output potential voltages and any kind of voltage losses, net generated power, CO<sub>2</sub> emission and energy and exergy efficiencies of two proposed cogeneration plants. The main sources of irreversibility are introduced for each system as well. The comparative analysis revealed that energy efficiencies of the IR-MCFC and IR-MCFC based cogeneration systems are about 14.85% and 4.82% larger than those of the ER-MCFC and ER-MCFC-based cogeneration systems, respectively. Also, exergy efficiencies of the IR-MCFC and IR-MCFC based cogeneration systems are about 14.46% and 11.08% more than exergy efficiencies of their external reforming types, respectively. The results indicated that CO<sub>2</sub> emission of ER-MCFC system (0.18 kg/MW) is almost two times of IR-MCFC system (0.36 kg/MW).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100556,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Communications","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052023000080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two different configurations of a system including a cogeneration plant based on molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) with internal steam reforming (IR-MCFC) and external steam reforming (ER-MCFC) for producing power and hot water are modeled and investigated thermodynamically. Energetic, exergetic and environmental analyses are performed for the proposed systems and compared with each other from different viewpoints. Effects of various parameters, namely after-burner emissions recycling, fuel utilization ratio, operating temperature of stack and current density are investigated on the output potential voltages and any kind of voltage losses, net generated power, CO2 emission and energy and exergy efficiencies of two proposed cogeneration plants. The main sources of irreversibility are introduced for each system as well. The comparative analysis revealed that energy efficiencies of the IR-MCFC and IR-MCFC based cogeneration systems are about 14.85% and 4.82% larger than those of the ER-MCFC and ER-MCFC-based cogeneration systems, respectively. Also, exergy efficiencies of the IR-MCFC and IR-MCFC based cogeneration systems are about 14.46% and 11.08% more than exergy efficiencies of their external reforming types, respectively. The results indicated that CO2 emission of ER-MCFC system (0.18 kg/MW) is almost two times of IR-MCFC system (0.36 kg/MW).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熔融碳酸盐燃料电池热电联产装置性能的能源和环境评价:外部蒸汽重整与内部蒸汽重整
对基于熔融碳酸盐燃料电池(MCFC)的热电联产系统的两种不同配置进行了热力学建模和研究,该热电联产系统具有内部蒸汽重整(IR-MCFC)和外部蒸汽重整(ER-MCFC),用于生产电力和热水。对所提出的系统进行了能量、体力和环境分析,并从不同的角度进行了比较。研究了不同参数,即燃烧器后排放物回收、燃料利用率、烟囱运行温度和电流密度对两个拟建热电联产厂的输出电势电压和任何类型的电压损失、净发电功率、CO2排放以及能量和火用效率的影响。对每个系统也介绍了不可逆性的主要来源。比较分析表明,基于IR-MCFC和IR-MCFC的热电联产系统的能效分别比基于ER-MCFC和ER-MCFC的发电联产系统高出约14.85%和4.82%。此外,基于IR-MCFC和IR-MCFC的热电联产系统的火用效率分别比其外部重整类型的火用率高出约14.46%和11.08%。结果表明,ER-MCFC系统的CO2排放量(0.18kg/MW)几乎是IR-MCFC系统(0.36kg/MW)的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biofuel in Ghana: Potentials and strategies for policy implementation Chemical agents for enhanced oil recovery: A comparison of a switchable hydrophilic solvent and deep eutectic solvent Properties and Autoignition reactivity of diesel boiling range ethers produced from Guerbet alcohols Assessment of potential sites for biogas production plants from domestic, agricultural, and livestock waste Effects of difference in heating sources on ammonia reactivity: Possibility for photolysis-assisted ammonia combustion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1