Association between physical activity and coronary artery calcification estimated by computed tomography: A systematic review

Walter Masson, Leandro Barbagelata, Mariano Falconi, Diego Pérez de Arenaza
{"title":"Association between physical activity and coronary artery calcification estimated by computed tomography: A systematic review","authors":"Walter Masson,&nbsp;Leandro Barbagelata,&nbsp;Mariano Falconi,&nbsp;Diego Pérez de Arenaza","doi":"10.1016/j.artere.2023.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The relationship between physical activity and coronary artery calcification (CAC) was evaluated in different studies during the last years, although the results were conflicting.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of the present systematic review was to assess the association between different levels of physical activity and CAC score estimated by computed tomography (CT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect studies that evaluated the association between physical activity and CAC score. The levels of physical activity evaluated were those reported by the original publications. The CAC score was estimated by CT and was reported in Agatston units.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty six studies including 89,405 subjects were considered eligible for this research. The studies developed in the general population showed different results regarding the association between physical activity and CAC score: no association (7 studies), a positive association (4 studies), an inverse relationship (6 studies), a U-shaped relationship (2 studies), or different results depending on the subgroup evaluated (2 studies). In the largest studies, a positive association was observed. When we analyzed the studies that evaluated athletes, four studies showed a positive association between exercise intensity and CAC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This systematic review showed disparate results regarding the association between physical activity and CAC score. The largest studies and most studies developed in athletes suggest that intense physical activity could be associated with high CAC score, although this hypothesis should be confirmed in future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100263,"journal":{"name":"Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition)","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 129-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529912323000311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The relationship between physical activity and coronary artery calcification (CAC) was evaluated in different studies during the last years, although the results were conflicting.

Objective

The main objective of the present systematic review was to assess the association between different levels of physical activity and CAC score estimated by computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect studies that evaluated the association between physical activity and CAC score. The levels of physical activity evaluated were those reported by the original publications. The CAC score was estimated by CT and was reported in Agatston units.

Results

Twenty six studies including 89,405 subjects were considered eligible for this research. The studies developed in the general population showed different results regarding the association between physical activity and CAC score: no association (7 studies), a positive association (4 studies), an inverse relationship (6 studies), a U-shaped relationship (2 studies), or different results depending on the subgroup evaluated (2 studies). In the largest studies, a positive association was observed. When we analyzed the studies that evaluated athletes, four studies showed a positive association between exercise intensity and CAC.

Conclusion

This systematic review showed disparate results regarding the association between physical activity and CAC score. The largest studies and most studies developed in athletes suggest that intense physical activity could be associated with high CAC score, although this hypothesis should be confirmed in future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过计算机断层扫描估计体育活动与冠状动脉钙化之间的关系:一项系统综述
背景在过去几年中,不同的研究评估了体育活动与冠状动脉钙化(CAC)之间的关系,尽管结果相互矛盾。目的本系统综述的主要目的是评估不同水平的体力活动与计算机断层扫描(CT)估计的CAC评分之间的关系。方法根据PRISMA指南进行系统综述。进行文献检索,以检测评估体力活动与CAC评分之间相关性的研究。评估的体育活动水平是原始出版物所报告的水平。CAC评分由CT估计,并以Agaston单位报告。结果包括89405名受试者在内的26项研究被认为符合本研究的条件。在普通人群中进行的研究显示,关于体育活动与CAC评分之间的关联,结果不同:无关联(7项研究)、正关联(4项研究),反比关系(6项研究)和U型关系(2项研究)或根据评估的亚组得出不同结果(2项研究)。在规模最大的研究中,观察到了正相关。当我们分析评估运动员的研究时,有四项研究显示运动强度与CAC呈正相关。结论这项系统综述显示,关于体育活动与CAC评分之间的关联,结果各不相同。对运动员进行的最大规模的研究和大多数研究表明,剧烈的体育活动可能与高CAC分数有关,尽管这一假设应在未来的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dietary plant microRNAs as potential regulators of cellular cholesterol efflux A new perspective on the regulatory role of miRNAS. Cross-kingdom regulation Clinical characterization and detection of subclinical atherosclerosis in subjects with extreme hyperalphalipoproteinemia Risk factors and assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with psoriatic arthritis In vitro 3D co-culture model of human endothelial and smooth muscle cells to study pathological vascular remodeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1