Asthma patients' perspectives on telehealth in disease management: A focus group study

Yu seon Sarah Chae , Noah Tregobov , Austin McMillan , Celine Bergeron , Iraj Poureslami
{"title":"Asthma patients' perspectives on telehealth in disease management: A focus group study","authors":"Yu seon Sarah Chae ,&nbsp;Noah Tregobov ,&nbsp;Austin McMillan ,&nbsp;Celine Bergeron ,&nbsp;Iraj Poureslami","doi":"10.1016/j.hctj.2023.100008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>While the effectiveness of telehealth (TH) to improve health outcomes is well established, the utility of <em>e</em>health care among adult asthma patients, particularly in patients with limited access to specialty lung clinic services, requires further investigation. This study aimed to explore asthma patients’ perceived applicability of TH in asthma self-management practices, to inform a future TH-based interventional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative exploratory study design was applied during virtual, patient-orientedfocus group sessions and individual telephone interviews. Participants responded to questions spanning 4 main topics: 1) understanding of and beliefs on TH; 2) perceptions about the application of electronic asthma action plans; 3) using tele-communication to interact with a care provider; and 4) prospective TH features for asthma management. Data were collected from 25 patients with asthma (19 attended one of two focus groups and 6 were interviewed individually). Codes and definitions were developed inductively and assembled into a coding framework. Transcripts were subsequently coded, and thematic analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Group discussions and individual interviews generated 4 TH-related themes: 1) past experiences and future use of TH; 2) perceived advantages and disadvantages of TH in asthma management; 3) integration of TH into self-management practices; and 4) features of a practical TH model for the current healthcare system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participants input in the design of TH interventions for asthma management could improve access to and quality of virtual care services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100602,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Transitions","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949923223000089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

While the effectiveness of telehealth (TH) to improve health outcomes is well established, the utility of ehealth care among adult asthma patients, particularly in patients with limited access to specialty lung clinic services, requires further investigation. This study aimed to explore asthma patients’ perceived applicability of TH in asthma self-management practices, to inform a future TH-based interventional study.

Methods

A qualitative exploratory study design was applied during virtual, patient-orientedfocus group sessions and individual telephone interviews. Participants responded to questions spanning 4 main topics: 1) understanding of and beliefs on TH; 2) perceptions about the application of electronic asthma action plans; 3) using tele-communication to interact with a care provider; and 4) prospective TH features for asthma management. Data were collected from 25 patients with asthma (19 attended one of two focus groups and 6 were interviewed individually). Codes and definitions were developed inductively and assembled into a coding framework. Transcripts were subsequently coded, and thematic analysis was performed.

Results

Group discussions and individual interviews generated 4 TH-related themes: 1) past experiences and future use of TH; 2) perceived advantages and disadvantages of TH in asthma management; 3) integration of TH into self-management practices; and 4) features of a practical TH model for the current healthcare system.

Conclusion

Participants input in the design of TH interventions for asthma management could improve access to and quality of virtual care services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哮喘患者在疾病管理中对远程医疗的看法:一项焦点小组研究
目的虽然远程医疗(TH)改善健康结果的有效性已得到充分证实,但健康护理在成年哮喘患者中的效用,特别是在获得专业肺部诊所服务有限的患者中,还需要进一步调查。本研究旨在探讨哮喘患者对TH在哮喘自我管理实践中的适用性,为未来基于TH的介入研究提供信息。方法在虚拟、面向患者的焦点小组会议和个人电话访谈中采用定性探索性研究设计。参与者回答了涉及4个主要主题的问题:1)对TH的理解和信念;2) 对电子哮喘行动计划应用的看法;3) 使用远程通信与护理提供者互动;和4)哮喘管理的前瞻性TH特征。数据收集自25名哮喘患者(19人参加了两个焦点小组中的一个,6人接受了单独访谈)。代码和定义是归纳开发的,并组装成一个编码框架。随后对转录本进行编码,并进行主题分析。结果小组讨论和个体访谈产生了4个TH相关主题:1)TH的过去经历和未来使用;2) TH在哮喘管理中的优势和劣势;3) 将TH纳入自我管理实践;以及4)用于当前医疗保健系统的实用TH模型的特征。结论参与者参与哮喘管理TH干预措施的设计可以提高虚拟护理服务的可及性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transition experiences of adolescents and young adults working with a patient navigator Self-perceived importance and confidence of adolescents transitioning to adult care Experiences of barriers and facilitators in mental health care transitions: A qualitative exploration of perspectives from transitional-aged youth, family, and service providers (part 1) The role of navigation services in supporting mental health and addictions care transitions: A qualitative exploration of perspectives from transitional-aged youth, family, and service providers (part 2) Bolstering connectedness through peer support: Randomized-controlled trial of a web-based peer support program for adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1