The Yield of Preoperative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery After Gastric Banding

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2023.02.002
Leontien M.G. Nijland , Kevin E.J. van den Brule , Ruben N. van Veen , Pim W. van Rutte , Sjoerd D. Kuiken , Steve M.M. de Castro
{"title":"The Yield of Preoperative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery After Gastric Banding","authors":"Leontien M.G. Nijland ,&nbsp;Kevin E.J. van den Brule ,&nbsp;Ruben N. van Veen ,&nbsp;Pim W. van Rutte ,&nbsp;Sjoerd D. Kuiken ,&nbsp;Steve M.M. de Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span>Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is routinely performed </span>in patients<span><span> who undergo conversion from adjustable gastric banding to another </span>bariatric procedure (eg, gastric bypass) of band removal. Band erosion is the main concern in these patients. The objective of this study was to analyze the yield of EGD in these patients.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients between 2008 and 2020 who underwent bariatric surgery<span> with an adjustable gastric band in place were included. Results of EGD were analyzed retrospectively and categorized according to clinical consequences.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Overall, 514 patients (62 male, 452 female; mean age 46 years; mean BMI 40) underwent surgery with an adjustable gastric band in situ. In total, 488 patients (95%) underwent preoperative EGD. No abnormalities were found in 205 patients (42%), 112 patients (23%) had abnormalities without treatment consequences, 156 patients (32%) had findings that required pharmaceutical (ie, </span>proton pump inhibitors<span> and/or antibiotics) intervention, and 15 patients (3.1%) had severe findings altering management (group D). In 5 of these patients (1.0%), surgery was postponed due to Barrett's esophagus<span>, and 10 of these patients (2.0%) had gastric band erosion. No subgroup of patients could be identified to increase the yield of the EGD.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Routine preoperative assessment by EGD in patients before bariatric surgery with an adjustable gastric band in situ still detects some severe abnormalities significantly altering management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 302-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is routinely performed in patients who undergo conversion from adjustable gastric banding to another bariatric procedure (eg, gastric bypass) of band removal. Band erosion is the main concern in these patients. The objective of this study was to analyze the yield of EGD in these patients.

Methods

All patients between 2008 and 2020 who underwent bariatric surgery with an adjustable gastric band in place were included. Results of EGD were analyzed retrospectively and categorized according to clinical consequences.

Results

Overall, 514 patients (62 male, 452 female; mean age 46 years; mean BMI 40) underwent surgery with an adjustable gastric band in situ. In total, 488 patients (95%) underwent preoperative EGD. No abnormalities were found in 205 patients (42%), 112 patients (23%) had abnormalities without treatment consequences, 156 patients (32%) had findings that required pharmaceutical (ie, proton pump inhibitors and/or antibiotics) intervention, and 15 patients (3.1%) had severe findings altering management (group D). In 5 of these patients (1.0%), surgery was postponed due to Barrett's esophagus, and 10 of these patients (2.0%) had gastric band erosion. No subgroup of patients could be identified to increase the yield of the EGD.

Conclusion

Routine preoperative assessment by EGD in patients before bariatric surgery with an adjustable gastric band in situ still detects some severe abnormalities significantly altering management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃束带术后减肥手术患者术前食管胃十二指肠镜检查的结果
背景和目的食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)是对从可调节胃束带术转换为另一种减肥手术(如胃旁路术)的患者进行的常规检查。带状侵蚀是这些患者主要关心的问题。本研究的目的是分析这些患者的EGD产量。方法纳入2008年至2020年期间接受可调节胃束带减肥手术的所有患者。对EGD的结果进行回顾性分析,并根据临床结果进行分类。结果514名患者(62名男性,452名女性;平均年龄46岁;平均BMI 40)接受了原位可调节胃束带的手术。总共有488名患者(95%)接受了术前EGD。205名患者(42%)未发现异常,112名患者(23%)出现异常而无治疗后果,156名患者(32%)发现需要药物(即质子泵抑制剂和/或抗生素)干预,15名患者(3.1%)发现严重改变治疗(D组)。其中5名患者(1.0%)因Barrett食管而推迟手术,其中10名患者(2.0%)出现胃束带侵蚀。没有发现任何亚组的患者可以增加EGD的产量。结论在原位可调节胃束带的减肥手术前,通过EGD对患者进行常规术前评估,仍然可以发现一些严重的异常,从而显著改变治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution The Endoscopic Role and Indications of Through-the-Scope Tack and Suture System for Gastrointestinal Closure Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1