Self-determination and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: Cross-national and longitudinal perspectives

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2023.102013
Jenna Bergdahl , Rita Latikka , Magdalena Celuch , Iina Savolainen , Eerik Soares Mantere , Nina Savela , Atte Oksanen
{"title":"Self-determination and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: Cross-national and longitudinal perspectives","authors":"Jenna Bergdahl ,&nbsp;Rita Latikka ,&nbsp;Magdalena Celuch ,&nbsp;Iina Savolainen ,&nbsp;Eerik Soares Mantere ,&nbsp;Nina Savela ,&nbsp;Atte Oksanen","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly important in all domains of life. Therefore, it is crucial to understand individuals’ attitudes towards AI. This article investigated attitudes toward AI through two studies that are based on the self-determination theory and basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness). Study 1 used cross-sectional samples of adult populations aged 18–75 from Finland (<em>N</em> = 1,541), France (<em>N</em> = 1,561), Germany (<em>N</em> = 1,529), Ireland (<em>N</em> = 1,112), Italy (<em>N</em> = 1,530), and Poland (<em>N</em> = 1,533). Study 2 was based on a longitudinal two-wave sample of adults aged 18–80 from Finland (<em>N</em> = 828). Based on the robust regression analyses, Study 1 found that fulfillment of basic psychological needs was associated with higher AI positivity and lower AI negativity across Europe. According to the Study 2 results, based on hybrid multilevel regression models, autonomy and relatedness increased AI positivity and decreased AI negativity over time. The results provide robust evidence on the role of self-determination in attitudes towards AI. Self-determination is an important factor in AI acceptance and is becoming increasingly important considering the rapid development and adoption of AI solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102013"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323000771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly important in all domains of life. Therefore, it is crucial to understand individuals’ attitudes towards AI. This article investigated attitudes toward AI through two studies that are based on the self-determination theory and basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness). Study 1 used cross-sectional samples of adult populations aged 18–75 from Finland (N = 1,541), France (N = 1,561), Germany (N = 1,529), Ireland (N = 1,112), Italy (N = 1,530), and Poland (N = 1,533). Study 2 was based on a longitudinal two-wave sample of adults aged 18–80 from Finland (N = 828). Based on the robust regression analyses, Study 1 found that fulfillment of basic psychological needs was associated with higher AI positivity and lower AI negativity across Europe. According to the Study 2 results, based on hybrid multilevel regression models, autonomy and relatedness increased AI positivity and decreased AI negativity over time. The results provide robust evidence on the role of self-determination in attitudes towards AI. Self-determination is an important factor in AI acceptance and is becoming increasingly important considering the rapid development and adoption of AI solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自决和对人工智能的态度:跨国和纵向视角
人工智能在生活的各个领域都变得越来越重要。因此,了解个体对人工智能的态度是至关重要的。本文通过两项基于自主理论和基本心理需求(自主性、能力和关联性)的研究来调查个体的人工智能态度。研究1使用了来自芬兰(N=1541)、法国(N=1561)、德国(N=1529)、爱尔兰(N=1112)、意大利(N=1530)和波兰(N=1533)的18-75岁成年人口的横断面样本。研究2基于芬兰18-80岁成年人的纵向两波样本(N=828)。基于稳健的回归分析,研究1发现,在整个欧洲,基本心理需求的满足与更高的人工智能积极性和更低的人工智能消极性有关。根据研究2的结果,基于混合多水平回归模型,随着时间的推移,自主性和相关性增加了AI的积极性,减少了AI的消极性。研究结果为自决在对人工智能的态度中的作用提供了有力的证据。自决是接受人工智能的一个重要因素,考虑到人工智能解决方案的快速发展和采用,自决变得越来越重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the dynamics of binge-scrolling: A comprehensive analysis of short-form video consumption using a Stimulus-Organism-Response model Motivations behind problematic short video use: A three-level meta-analysis Crypto-Cognitive Exploitation: Integrating Cognitive, Social, and Technological perspectives on cryptocurrency fraud Are you what you emoji? How skin tone emojis and profile pictures shape attention and social inference processing Engaging with underserved communities during times of crises: A computational analysis of social media interactions with government information about COVID-19 economic relief programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1