Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy—Current Evidence and Future Directions

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2023.02.004
Saurabh Chandan , Jay Bapaye , Daryl Ramai , Antonio Facciorusso
{"title":"Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy—Current Evidence and Future Directions","authors":"Saurabh Chandan ,&nbsp;Jay Bapaye ,&nbsp;Daryl Ramai ,&nbsp;Antonio Facciorusso","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence continues to steadily rise in various parts of the world, and there remains an urgent need for effective interventions to tackle this. Effective and timely implementation of CRC screening interventions and adherence to post </span>polypectomy<span><span> surveillance recommendations remain paramount. Colonoscopy<span> is the gold standard for timely diagnosis and removal of precursor lesions or polyps to CRC; however, patient uptake and cost effectiveness, especially in the era of noninvasive testing strategies, require closer evaluation. Furthermore, the risk of progression to CRC varies with the morphology, size, and histology of </span></span>colorectal polyps. Several colonoscopy-based resection techniques have been reported in literature to effectively and safely remove these precursor lesions. In this review, we summarize the current guidelines (US and Europe) and evidence for the effectiveness of post-polypectomy surveillance, resection, and surveillance for sessile serrated lesions. We also appraise the current literature regarding non-colonoscopy options for post colonoscopy surveillance, as well as interventions to boost adherence to surveillance.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 269-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259003072300020X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence continues to steadily rise in various parts of the world, and there remains an urgent need for effective interventions to tackle this. Effective and timely implementation of CRC screening interventions and adherence to post polypectomy surveillance recommendations remain paramount. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for timely diagnosis and removal of precursor lesions or polyps to CRC; however, patient uptake and cost effectiveness, especially in the era of noninvasive testing strategies, require closer evaluation. Furthermore, the risk of progression to CRC varies with the morphology, size, and histology of colorectal polyps. Several colonoscopy-based resection techniques have been reported in literature to effectively and safely remove these precursor lesions. In this review, we summarize the current guidelines (US and Europe) and evidence for the effectiveness of post-polypectomy surveillance, resection, and surveillance for sessile serrated lesions. We also appraise the current literature regarding non-colonoscopy options for post colonoscopy surveillance, as well as interventions to boost adherence to surveillance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
息肉切除术后的监测结肠镜检查-目前的证据和未来的方向
癌症的发病率在世界各地持续稳步上升,仍然迫切需要有效的干预措施来解决这一问题。有效及时实施CRC筛查干预措施和遵守息肉切除术后监测建议仍然至关重要。结肠镜检查是及时诊断和切除CRC前病变或息肉的金标准;然而,患者的接受率和成本效益,尤其是在无创检测策略的时代,需要更仔细的评估。此外,进展为CRC的风险随着结肠直肠息肉的形态、大小和组织学而变化。文献中报道了几种基于结肠镜检查的切除技术,可以有效、安全地切除这些前驱病变。在这篇综述中,我们总结了目前的指南(美国和欧洲)以及息肉切除术后监测、切除和无柄锯齿状病变监测的有效性证据。我们还评估了目前关于结肠镜检查后监测的非结肠镜检查选项以及提高监测依从性的干预措施的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution The Endoscopic Role and Indications of Through-the-Scope Tack and Suture System for Gastrointestinal Closure Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1