Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire

Antonio Malvasi , Gianluca Raffaello Damiani , Amerigo Vitagliano , Miriam Dellino , Reuven Achiron , Kosmas Ioannis , Antonella Vimercati , Maria Gaetani , Ettore Cicinelli , Marina Vinciguerra , Ilaria Ricci , Andrea Tinelli , Giorgio Maria Baldini , Giuseppe Trojano
{"title":"Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire","authors":"Antonio Malvasi ,&nbsp;Gianluca Raffaello Damiani ,&nbsp;Amerigo Vitagliano ,&nbsp;Miriam Dellino ,&nbsp;Reuven Achiron ,&nbsp;Kosmas Ioannis ,&nbsp;Antonella Vimercati ,&nbsp;Maria Gaetani ,&nbsp;Ettore Cicinelli ,&nbsp;Marina Vinciguerra ,&nbsp;Ilaria Ricci ,&nbsp;Andrea Tinelli ,&nbsp;Giorgio Maria Baldini ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Trojano","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an“ obstetric violence”, because it is a young technique, not often well \"accepted\". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an informed consent from patients, prior to perform a translabial ultrasound (TU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of both translabial and transabdominal IU.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this study, performed at the University Hospital of Bari (Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology), were enrolled 103 patients in the first or second stage of labor in singleton cephalic presentation. A statistical frequency and an association analysis were performed. As a significant result, we consider the peace of mind/satisfaction and the” obstetric violence”. IU was performed both transabdominal and translabial to determine the presentation, head positions, angle of progression and head perineum distance. During the first and second stage of labor, the ASIUG questionnaires (Apulia study intrapartum ultrasonography group) were administered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>74 (71, 84%) patients underwent IU and 29 had a vaginal examination (28, 15%). Significant less “violence” has been experienced with a IU (73 out 74/98, 65%) and only one person (1 /1, 35%) recorded that. On the contrary, 10 patients (10/29) perceived that “violence” (34, 48%) while 19 (65, 52%) did not respond on a similar way, after a vaginal examination (VE). More patients felt satisfaction (71 out 74/95, 95%) with the use of IU and only 3 (3/4, 05%) felt unease. A different picture was evident in the vaginal examination group. Only 17 patients (17 out 29/58, 62%) felt comfort while 12 (41, 38%) felt unease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our study, IU use is well accepted by most of patients, because it could reassure women about their fetal condition. Moreover, they can see the fetus on the screen, while the obstetrician is performing the US and this is important for a visual feedback, in comparison with the classical VE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161323000716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an“ obstetric violence”, because it is a young technique, not often well "accepted". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an informed consent from patients, prior to perform a translabial ultrasound (TU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of both translabial and transabdominal IU.

Methods

In this study, performed at the University Hospital of Bari (Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology), were enrolled 103 patients in the first or second stage of labor in singleton cephalic presentation. A statistical frequency and an association analysis were performed. As a significant result, we consider the peace of mind/satisfaction and the” obstetric violence”. IU was performed both transabdominal and translabial to determine the presentation, head positions, angle of progression and head perineum distance. During the first and second stage of labor, the ASIUG questionnaires (Apulia study intrapartum ultrasonography group) were administered.

Results

74 (71, 84%) patients underwent IU and 29 had a vaginal examination (28, 15%). Significant less “violence” has been experienced with a IU (73 out 74/98, 65%) and only one person (1 /1, 35%) recorded that. On the contrary, 10 patients (10/29) perceived that “violence” (34, 48%) while 19 (65, 52%) did not respond on a similar way, after a vaginal examination (VE). More patients felt satisfaction (71 out 74/95, 95%) with the use of IU and only 3 (3/4, 05%) felt unease. A different picture was evident in the vaginal examination group. Only 17 patients (17 out 29/58, 62%) felt comfort while 12 (41, 38%) felt unease.

Conclusions

In our study, IU use is well accepted by most of patients, because it could reassure women about their fetal condition. Moreover, they can see the fetus on the screen, while the obstetrician is performing the US and this is important for a visual feedback, in comparison with the classical VE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前超声检查与母亲接受度:知情同意和问卷调查研究
引言产房应用产内超声;即使IU对分娩妇女进行监测,也可能被视为一种不适,甚至是“产科暴力”,因为这是一种年轻的技术,通常不被“接受”。一组临床医生旨在在进行经唇超声检查(TU)之前获得患者的知情同意。本研究的目的是评估经唇和经腹宫内节育器的可接受性。方法在巴里大学医院(妇产科)进行的这项研究中,103名患者在分娩的第一或第二阶段出现单胎头畸形。进行了统计频率和关联分析。作为一个重要的结果,我们考虑到心灵的平静/满足和“产科暴力”。经腹部和阴唇进行IU,以确定表现、头部位置、进展角度和头部-会阴距离。在分娩的第一和第二阶段,使用ASIUG问卷(Apulia研究产时超声组)。结果74例(7184%)患者接受了IU检查,29例(2815%)患者进行了阴道检查。IU经历的“暴力”明显减少(74/98中有73次,65%),只有一个人(1/1,35%)记录了这一点。相反,10名患者(10/29)在阴道检查(VE)后感觉到“暴力”(34.48%),而19名患者(65.52%)没有类似的反应。更多的患者对IU的使用感到满意(71/95/95%),只有3名患者(3/4.05%)感到不安。阴道检查组的情况明显不同。只有17名患者(29/58中有17名,62%)感到舒适,而12名患者(4138%)感到不安。结论在我们的研究中,IU的使用被大多数患者所接受,因为它可以让女性放心自己的胎儿状况。此外,当产科医生进行超声检查时,他们可以在屏幕上看到胎儿,与传统的VE相比,这对视觉反馈很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Foeto–Maternal outcomes of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks of gestation after induced or spontaneous labour Editorial Board Epidemiology and placental pathology of intrauterine fetal demise in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines Perinatal outcomes in indian women with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS): Five year experience from a tertiary care centre Postmortem fertilization: New Italian government guidelines affirm the legitimacy of this procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1