Implications of blood indices in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Two feasible determinants of disease activity and lupus nephritis

IF 1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Egyptian Rheumatologist Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejr.2023.04.006
Samar A. Aldakhakhny , Hossam A. Hodeeb , Nagat M. El-Gazzar , Shereen Elwan
{"title":"Implications of blood indices in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Two feasible determinants of disease activity and lupus nephritis","authors":"Samar A. Aldakhakhny ,&nbsp;Hossam A. Hodeeb ,&nbsp;Nagat M. El-Gazzar ,&nbsp;Shereen Elwan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejr.2023.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim of the work</h3><p>To investigate whether or not neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may by indicators of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with and without lupus nephritis (LN).</p><p>Patients and methods</p><p>This research was carried out on 40 adult SLE patients (20 with LN and 20 without) and 20 controls. The NLR and PLR were calculated. The SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) was assessed.</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean age of the patients was 36.2 ± 7.6 years, 38 females and 2 males (F:M 19:1), with a disease duration of4.3 ± 1.2 years. The mean SLEDAI was 15.1 ± 4.7 being significantly higher in those with LN (17.5 ± 3.5) compared to those without (12.6 ± 4.6) (p = 0.001). The mean NLR (6.1 ± 2.1) and PLR (236.6 ± 86.9) were significantly increased in patients compared to the control (2.7 ± 1.2 and 125.2 ± 38.8 respectively) (p &lt; 0.001). The NLR and PLR were both significantly related to the serum creatinine (r = 0.35, p = 0.03 and r = 0.5, p = 0.001) and SLEDAI (r = 0.36, p = 0.03 and r = 0.34, p = 0.03 respectively). NLR can significantly predict activity of SLE at cut off 5.6 with a sensitivity 80%, specificity 65% (p = 0.007) and PLR at cut off 217 with sensitivity 75%, specificity 65% (p = 0.035). The NLR can significantly predict LN at cut off 3.6 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 40%; p = 0.007) and PLR at cut off 186 (sensitivity 70%, specificity 60%; p = 0.035).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>There is a remarkable link between PLR and NLR with SLEDAI. Thus, both may serve as promising affordable indicators of inflammation in SLE. The notable relation to LN may signal renal involvement in patients with SLE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46152,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Rheumatologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Rheumatologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116423000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the work

To investigate whether or not neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may by indicators of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with and without lupus nephritis (LN).

Patients and methods

This research was carried out on 40 adult SLE patients (20 with LN and 20 without) and 20 controls. The NLR and PLR were calculated. The SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) was assessed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 36.2 ± 7.6 years, 38 females and 2 males (F:M 19:1), with a disease duration of4.3 ± 1.2 years. The mean SLEDAI was 15.1 ± 4.7 being significantly higher in those with LN (17.5 ± 3.5) compared to those without (12.6 ± 4.6) (p = 0.001). The mean NLR (6.1 ± 2.1) and PLR (236.6 ± 86.9) were significantly increased in patients compared to the control (2.7 ± 1.2 and 125.2 ± 38.8 respectively) (p < 0.001). The NLR and PLR were both significantly related to the serum creatinine (r = 0.35, p = 0.03 and r = 0.5, p = 0.001) and SLEDAI (r = 0.36, p = 0.03 and r = 0.34, p = 0.03 respectively). NLR can significantly predict activity of SLE at cut off 5.6 with a sensitivity 80%, specificity 65% (p = 0.007) and PLR at cut off 217 with sensitivity 75%, specificity 65% (p = 0.035). The NLR can significantly predict LN at cut off 3.6 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 40%; p = 0.007) and PLR at cut off 186 (sensitivity 70%, specificity 60%; p = 0.035).

Conclusion

There is a remarkable link between PLR and NLR with SLEDAI. Thus, both may serve as promising affordable indicators of inflammation in SLE. The notable relation to LN may signal renal involvement in patients with SLE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性红斑狼疮患者血液指标的意义:疾病活动性和狼疮性肾炎的两个可行决定因素
目的探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)是否可以作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)伴发和不伴发狼疮性肾炎(LN)的疾病活动指标。计算NLR和PLR。评估SLE疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)。结果患者平均年龄36.2±7.6岁,女性38例,男性2例(F:M 19:1),疾病持续时间为4.3±1.2年。LN患者的平均SLEDAI为15.1±4.7(17.5±3.5),显著高于无LN患者的(12.6±4.6)(p=0.001)。与对照组相比,患者的平均NLR(6.1±2.1)和PLR(236.6±86.9)显著增加(分别为2.7±1.2和125.2±38.8)(p<0.001)两者均与血清肌酸酐(r=0.35,p=0.03和r=0.5,p=0.001)和SLEDAI(分别为r=0.36,p=0.03和r=0.34,p=0.03)显著相关。NLR可显著预测SLE在临界点5.6时的活动性(敏感性为80%、特异性为65%(p=0.007))和在临界点217时的PLR(敏感性为75%),特异性65%(p=0.035)。NLR可显著预测截断时LN 3.6(敏感性80%,特异性40%;p=0.007)和截断时PLR 186(敏感性70%,特异性60%;p=0.035)。因此,两者都可以作为SLE炎症的有前景的负担得起的指标。与LN的显著相关性可能是SLE患者肾脏受累的信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Rheumatologist
Egyptian Rheumatologist RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
22.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Procalcitonin level in systemic lupus erythematosus patients and its relation to disease activity and infection Evaluation of functional measures and laboratory parameters to portend limitations of spinal mobility in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis Clinical signficance of human leucocytic antigen (HLA-B27) in patients with early and late-onset axial spondyloarthritis Cardiovascular risk assessment in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis Characteristics of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1