The final lengthening of pre-boundary syllables turns into final shortening as boundary strength levels increase

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Phonetics Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101225
Gerrit Kentner , Isabelle Franz , Christine A. Knoop , Winfried Menninghaus
{"title":"The final lengthening of pre-boundary syllables turns into final shortening as boundary strength levels increase","authors":"Gerrit Kentner ,&nbsp;Isabelle Franz ,&nbsp;Christine A. Knoop ,&nbsp;Winfried Menninghaus","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phrase-final syllable duration and pauses are generally considered to be positively correlated: The stronger the boundary, the longer the duration of phrase-final syllables, and the more likely or longer a pause. Exploring a large sample of complex literary prose texts read aloud, we examined pause likelihood and duration, pre-boundary syllable duration, and the pitch excursion at prosodic boundaries. Comparing these features across six predicted levels of boundary strength (level 0: no break; 1: simple phrase break; 2: short comma phrase break; 3: long comma phrase break; 4: sentence boundary; 5: direct speech boundary), we find that they are not correlated in a simple monotonic fashion. Whereas pause duration monotonically increases with boundary strength, both pre-boundary syllable duration and the pitch excursion on the pre-boundary syllable are largest for level-2 breaks and decrease significantly through levels 3 to 5. Our analysis suggests that pre-boundary syllable duration is partly contingent on the tonal realization, which is subject to f0 declination as the utterance progresses. We also surmise that pre-boundary syllable duration reflects differences in planning complexity for the different prosodic and syntactic boundaries. Overall, this study shows that a simple monotonic correlation between pause duration and pre-boundary syllable duration is not valid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447023000141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Phrase-final syllable duration and pauses are generally considered to be positively correlated: The stronger the boundary, the longer the duration of phrase-final syllables, and the more likely or longer a pause. Exploring a large sample of complex literary prose texts read aloud, we examined pause likelihood and duration, pre-boundary syllable duration, and the pitch excursion at prosodic boundaries. Comparing these features across six predicted levels of boundary strength (level 0: no break; 1: simple phrase break; 2: short comma phrase break; 3: long comma phrase break; 4: sentence boundary; 5: direct speech boundary), we find that they are not correlated in a simple monotonic fashion. Whereas pause duration monotonically increases with boundary strength, both pre-boundary syllable duration and the pitch excursion on the pre-boundary syllable are largest for level-2 breaks and decrease significantly through levels 3 to 5. Our analysis suggests that pre-boundary syllable duration is partly contingent on the tonal realization, which is subject to f0 declination as the utterance progresses. We also surmise that pre-boundary syllable duration reflects differences in planning complexity for the different prosodic and syntactic boundaries. Overall, this study shows that a simple monotonic correlation between pause duration and pre-boundary syllable duration is not valid.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边界前音节的最后延长随着边界强度的增加而变成最后缩短
短语末音节持续时间和停顿通常被认为是正相关的:边界越强,短语末音节的持续时间越长,停顿的可能性或时间越长。研究了大量朗读的复杂文学散文文本样本,我们检查了停顿的可能性和持续时间、边界前音节持续时间以及韵律边界处的音高偏移。比较六个预测边界强度水平(0级:无中断;1级:简单短语中断;2级:短逗号短语中断;3级:长逗号短语中断,4级:句子边界;5级:直接语音边界)的这些特征,我们发现它们不是以简单单调的方式相关的。尽管停顿持续时间随着边界强度单调增加,但边界前音节持续时间和边界前音节上的音高偏移在2级中断时最大,并且在3至5级时显著减少。我们的分析表明,边界前音节的持续时间在一定程度上取决于音调的实现,而音调的实现随着话语的进行而发生f0的下降。我们还推测,边界前音节持续时间反映了不同韵律和句法边界的规划复杂性的差异。总之,本研究表明,停顿持续时间和边界前音节持续时间之间的简单单调相关性是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
期刊最新文献
Talker variability versus variability of vowel context in training naïve learners on an unfamiliar class of foreign language contrasts Effects of syllable position and place of articulation on secondary dorsal contrasts: An ultrasound study of Irish On the target of phonetic convergence: Acoustic and linguistic aspects of pitch accent imitation Effects of word-level structure on oral stop realization in Hawaiian Lexically-guided perceptual recalibration from acoustically unambiguous input in second language learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1