Comparison of deep convolutional neural network classifiers and the effect of scale encoding for automated pavement assessment

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtte.2022.08.002
Elham Eslami, Hae-Bum Yun
{"title":"Comparison of deep convolutional neural network classifiers and the effect of scale encoding for automated pavement assessment","authors":"Elham Eslami,&nbsp;Hae-Bum Yun","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deep learning has received a growing interest in recent years for detecting different types of pavement distresses and automating pavement condition assessment. A proper choice of deep learning models is key for successful pavement assessment applications. In this study, we first present a comprehensive experimental comparison of state-of-the-art image classification models to evaluate their performances on 11 pavement objects classification. Our experiments are conducted in different dimensions of comparison, including deep classifier architecture, effects of network depth, and computational costs. Five convolutional neural network (CNN) classifiers widely used in transportation applications, including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, DenseNet121, and a generic CNN (as the control model), are tested with a comprehensive pixel-level annotated dataset for 11 different distress and non-distress classes (UCF-PAVE 2017). In addition, we investigate a simple yet effective approach of encoding contextual information with multi-scale input tiles to classify highly random pavement objects in size, shape, intensity, texture, and direction. Our comparison results show that the multi-scale approach significantly improves the classification accuracy for all compared deep classifiers at a negligible extra computational cost. Finally, we provide recommendations of how to improve the classification performance of deep CNNs for automated pavement condition assessment based on the comparison results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 258-275"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756423000338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Deep learning has received a growing interest in recent years for detecting different types of pavement distresses and automating pavement condition assessment. A proper choice of deep learning models is key for successful pavement assessment applications. In this study, we first present a comprehensive experimental comparison of state-of-the-art image classification models to evaluate their performances on 11 pavement objects classification. Our experiments are conducted in different dimensions of comparison, including deep classifier architecture, effects of network depth, and computational costs. Five convolutional neural network (CNN) classifiers widely used in transportation applications, including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, DenseNet121, and a generic CNN (as the control model), are tested with a comprehensive pixel-level annotated dataset for 11 different distress and non-distress classes (UCF-PAVE 2017). In addition, we investigate a simple yet effective approach of encoding contextual information with multi-scale input tiles to classify highly random pavement objects in size, shape, intensity, texture, and direction. Our comparison results show that the multi-scale approach significantly improves the classification accuracy for all compared deep classifiers at a negligible extra computational cost. Finally, we provide recommendations of how to improve the classification performance of deep CNNs for automated pavement condition assessment based on the comparison results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度卷积神经网络分类器的比较及尺度编码在路面自动评估中的作用
近年来,深度学习在检测不同类型的路面病害和自动化路面状况评估方面受到了越来越多的关注。正确选择深度学习模型是成功应用路面评估的关键。在这项研究中,我们首先对最先进的图像分类模型进行了全面的实验比较,以评估它们在11个路面对象分类方面的性能。我们的实验是在不同维度的比较中进行的,包括深度分类器架构、网络深度的影响和计算成本。使用11个不同遇险和非遇险类别的综合像素级注释数据集(UCF-PAVE 2017)测试了五个广泛用于交通应用的卷积神经网络(CNN)分类器,包括VGG16、VGG19、ResNet50、DenseNet121和一个通用CNN(作为控制模型)。此外,我们研究了一种简单而有效的方法,即用多尺度输入瓦片编码上下文信息,以在大小、形状、强度、纹理和方向上对高度随机的路面对象进行分类。我们的比较结果表明,多尺度方法显著提高了所有比较的深度分类器的分类精度,而额外的计算成本可以忽略不计。最后,基于比较结果,我们提出了如何提高深层细胞神经网络的分类性能,用于自动路面状况评估的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.30%
发文量
402
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.
期刊最新文献
Potential applications for composite utilization of rubber and plastic in asphalt pavements: A critical review Design equations for maximum stress concentration factors for concrete-filled steel tubular K-joints A systematic review of digital twins for electric vehicles Architecture, application, and prospect of digital twin for highway infrastructure Assessing the risk of pedestrian crossing behavior on suburban roads using structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1