Effect of an educational intervention program on discharge planning for nurses and midwives

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Enfermeria Clinica Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfcli.2023.01.005
Willy Andriano Jehosua , Netty Kakerissa , Ria Novalia Pangaribuan , Ni Gusti Ayu Eka
{"title":"Effect of an educational intervention program on discharge planning for nurses and midwives","authors":"Willy Andriano Jehosua ,&nbsp;Netty Kakerissa ,&nbsp;Ria Novalia Pangaribuan ,&nbsp;Ni Gusti Ayu Eka","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2023.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To evaluate the effect of educational intervention program to improve the knowledge of nurses and midwives on discharge planning.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>The study employed a quasi-experimental pre-post design without control group. Total of 165 nurses and midwives working on general and critical care wards were included in the study. The researchers created a questionnaire based on the discharge planning form from the hospital's Quality and Risk Management team. To assess the respondent's knowledge of discharge planning. The questionnaire's validity and reliability were established using a biserial point validity test (&gt;0.20) and a reliability test using the KR 20 formula (0.865). The study collected data before and after the program. Both univariate and bivariate analyses were used to analyze the data. The educational intervention took place between 31 January and 9 February 2022 and consisted of 11 sessions lasting between 60 and 120</span> <!-->min each. The researchers implemented the educational program with the assistance of materials provided by the hospital's Quality and Risk Management team.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study enrolled a total of 161 individuals (97% response rate). This study revealed that there were differences in nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge levels before and after the educational intervention (<em>p</em> value 0.001). However, there was no difference in the level of knowledge between in-charge and clinicals prior to and following the educational intervention (<em>p</em> value<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05). In addition, most of respondents (&gt;90%) reported that the educational intervention program was very good. The respondents also suggested that the educational program on discharge planning should be conducted periodically.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The educational intervention program was successful in terms of increasing the knowledge of nurses and midwives. Monitoring and evaluating the knowledge of nurses and midwives regarding discharge planning is also essential for conducting periodic discharge planning training. In addition, a discharge planning module must be regularly reevaluated to ensure that discharge planning education meets the needs of patients and hospitals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862123000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To evaluate the effect of educational intervention program to improve the knowledge of nurses and midwives on discharge planning.

Method

The study employed a quasi-experimental pre-post design without control group. Total of 165 nurses and midwives working on general and critical care wards were included in the study. The researchers created a questionnaire based on the discharge planning form from the hospital's Quality and Risk Management team. To assess the respondent's knowledge of discharge planning. The questionnaire's validity and reliability were established using a biserial point validity test (>0.20) and a reliability test using the KR 20 formula (0.865). The study collected data before and after the program. Both univariate and bivariate analyses were used to analyze the data. The educational intervention took place between 31 January and 9 February 2022 and consisted of 11 sessions lasting between 60 and 120 min each. The researchers implemented the educational program with the assistance of materials provided by the hospital's Quality and Risk Management team.

Results

The study enrolled a total of 161 individuals (97% response rate). This study revealed that there were differences in nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge levels before and after the educational intervention (p value 0.001). However, there was no difference in the level of knowledge between in-charge and clinicals prior to and following the educational intervention (p value > 0.05). In addition, most of respondents (>90%) reported that the educational intervention program was very good. The respondents also suggested that the educational program on discharge planning should be conducted periodically.

Conclusions

The educational intervention program was successful in terms of increasing the knowledge of nurses and midwives. Monitoring and evaluating the knowledge of nurses and midwives regarding discharge planning is also essential for conducting periodic discharge planning training. In addition, a discharge planning module must be regularly reevaluated to ensure that discharge planning education meets the needs of patients and hospitals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育干预计划对护士和助产士出院计划的影响
目的评价教育干预计划对提高护士和助产士出院计划知识的效果。方法采用无对照组的准实验性前后设计。研究共包括165名在普通病房和重症监护病房工作的护士和助产士。研究人员根据医院质量和风险管理团队的出院计划表制作了一份问卷。评估被申请人对出院计划的了解。问卷的有效性和可靠性采用双序列点有效性检验(>;0.20)和KR 20公式的可靠性检验(0.865)。研究收集了项目前后的数据。使用单变量和双变量分析来分析数据。教育干预于2022年1月31日至2月9日进行,共11次,每次持续60至120分钟。研究人员在医院质量和风险管理团队提供的材料的帮助下实施了教育计划。结果本研究共纳入161名患者(有效率97%)。本研究显示,教育干预前后护士和助产士的知识水平存在差异(p值0.001)。然而,教育干预前和教育干预后主管和临床医生的知识水平没有差异(p值>;0.05)。此外,大多数受访者(>;90%)表示教育干预计划非常好。受访者还建议定期开展出院计划教育计划。结论教育干预计划在提高护士和助产士的知识方面是成功的。监测和评估护士和助产士关于出院规划的知识对于定期进行出院规划培训也至关重要。此外,必须定期重新评估出院计划模块,以确保出院计划教育满足患者和医院的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
期刊最新文献
Uso de la medicina complementaria y alternativa y enfoques para hacer frente al estrés en las mujeres con cáncer de mama: un estudio transversal El papel moderador de la experiencia laboral en el efecto de la cultura ética en la denuncia de irregularidades en los profesionales de la salud y el efecto de la confianza organizacional en la denuncia de irregularidades Impacto de los niveles de interacción enfermera-paciente en la práctica humanística de enfermería: estudio transversal, descriptivo y correlacional Satisfacción de los pacientes sobre la atención recibida por la enfermera en el triaje de los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios: revisión de alcance Transferencia de resultados en la práctica clínica y participación ciudadana en la investigación en cuidados: una integración necesaria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1