Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario DASH en mujeres con linfedema secundario a tratamiento de cáncer de mama

Q3 Medicine Rehabilitacion Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rh.2022.100780
A.B. Puentes Gutiérrez , M. García Bascones , F. Jiménez Díaz , R. Cuena Boy , R. Puentes Gutiérrez
{"title":"Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario DASH en mujeres con linfedema secundario a tratamiento de cáncer de mama","authors":"A.B. Puentes Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;M. García Bascones ,&nbsp;F. Jiménez Díaz ,&nbsp;R. Cuena Boy ,&nbsp;R. Puentes Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2022.100780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>DASH questionnaire was designed to assess upper limb function in musculoskeletal pathologies. The aim of this manuscript is to study the reliability and validity of this questionnaire, to determine if is adequate to use in women with lymphedema due to breast cancer treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective study in 65 women with lymphedema due to breast cancer treatment was done, in which the reliability of DASH score with internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test–retest reproducibility 15 days’ interval (interclass correlation coefficient) and validity by correlation with SF-36v2 and FACT-B+4 (r or Kendall's τ b) scores was investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The internal consistency and the test–retest were Cronbach's alpha 0.969 and interclass correlation coefficient 0.861, respectively. There was correlation between the DASH score with the SF-36v2 score, mainly in the areas of physical function, body pain and physical role (<em>r</em> 0.800, 0.738, and 0.682, respectively; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), and lowest with the emotional and social wellbeing. The DASH score had correlation with FACT-B+4 (0.836; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and the subscales the upper limb score (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.816; <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), and there was no correlation with the social/familiar subscale (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.193; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.216).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DASH questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to assess upper limb functionality in Spanish women with breast cancer related lymphedema.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 100780"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712022001104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

DASH questionnaire was designed to assess upper limb function in musculoskeletal pathologies. The aim of this manuscript is to study the reliability and validity of this questionnaire, to determine if is adequate to use in women with lymphedema due to breast cancer treatment.

Methods

Prospective study in 65 women with lymphedema due to breast cancer treatment was done, in which the reliability of DASH score with internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test–retest reproducibility 15 days’ interval (interclass correlation coefficient) and validity by correlation with SF-36v2 and FACT-B+4 (r or Kendall's τ b) scores was investigated.

Results

The internal consistency and the test–retest were Cronbach's alpha 0.969 and interclass correlation coefficient 0.861, respectively. There was correlation between the DASH score with the SF-36v2 score, mainly in the areas of physical function, body pain and physical role (r 0.800, 0.738, and 0.682, respectively; p < 0.001), and lowest with the emotional and social wellbeing. The DASH score had correlation with FACT-B+4 (0.836; p < 0.001) and the subscales the upper limb score (r = 0.816; p < 0.001), and there was no correlation with the social/familiar subscale (r = 0.193; p = 0.216).

Conclusion

The DASH questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to assess upper limb functionality in Spanish women with breast cancer related lymphedema.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DASH问卷在乳腺癌治疗后继发淋巴水肿妇女中的有效性和可靠性
引言DASH问卷旨在评估肌肉骨骼疾病中的上肢功能。本文的目的是研究该问卷的可靠性和有效性,以确定是否适合用于癌症治疗所致淋巴水肿的女性。方法对65例因癌症治疗而淋巴水肿的女性进行前瞻性研究,研究DASH评分与内部一致性(Cronbach’sα)和检验-复验重现性15天间隔(类间相关系数)的可靠性,以及与SF-36v2和FACT-B+4(r或Kendall’sτB)评分相关的有效性。结果内部一致性和检验-复验分别为Cronbachα0.969和类间相关系数0.861。DASH评分与SF-36v2评分之间存在相关性,主要在身体功能、身体疼痛和身体角色方面(r分别为0.800、0.738和0.682;p<0.001),与情绪和社会幸福感最低。DASH评分与FACT-B+4(0.836;p<0.001)和上肢评分分量表(r=0.816;p<0.01)有相关性,与社会/熟悉分量表无相关性(r=0.193;p=0.216)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitacion
Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitación: cambio de etapa e inicio de una nueva era Recomendaciones de No hacer en rehabilitación y medicina física desde distintos ámbitos de intervención Diferencias clínicas y pronósticas de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en mujeres derivadas a rehabilitación respiratoria: una visión con enfoque de género Adaptación transcultural de la escala «sistema de evaluación del equilibrio» (Mini-BESTest) en pacientes con accidente cerebrovascular From confusion to clarity: Strategies for effective communication in skeletal muscle rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1