Interprofessional team membership stability and medical errors in emergency departments

Maria Corvinelli Krentz , Denise Rizzolo
{"title":"Interprofessional team membership stability and medical errors in emergency departments","authors":"Maria Corvinelli Krentz ,&nbsp;Denise Rizzolo","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Delays to care and treatment in </span>emergency departments<span> (EDs) can lead to medical errors that harm patients. To optimize ED outcomes, indicators exist that define time frames within which patients should be assessed, receive care, and be discharged and they include time to triage, time to physician assessment (PIA), and time to discharge. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between temporal TMS and medical errors as delays to care in EDs. Methods: A nonexperimental, quantitative, cross-sectional, and correlational research design was used to study the relationship between differences in IP team membership due to shift work schedules (i.e., TMS) and medical errors as patient outcomes within EDs. Fifteen EDs and urgent care centres (referred collectively as EDs) located in the province of Manitoba, Canada were selected for this study. Results: medical errors occurred at each ED but to different extents; ED teams had low temporal stability; TMS and medical errors were not statistically significant, but worked experience captured by the individual team competence index (ITCI) decreased time to physician and length of stay was. TMS had a negative moderating effect on ITCI and neither TMS nor ITCI were statistically significant when patient volumes and levels of acuity were controlled. In contrast, when team size was controlled, TMS had a large effect size on time to physician. Conclusion: low TMS was not a significant factor in medical errors measured as delays to care but probably related to other organizational factors and team dynamics.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Delays to care and treatment in emergency departments (EDs) can lead to medical errors that harm patients. To optimize ED outcomes, indicators exist that define time frames within which patients should be assessed, receive care, and be discharged and they include time to triage, time to physician assessment (PIA), and time to discharge. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between temporal TMS and medical errors as delays to care in EDs. Methods: A nonexperimental, quantitative, cross-sectional, and correlational research design was used to study the relationship between differences in IP team membership due to shift work schedules (i.e., TMS) and medical errors as patient outcomes within EDs. Fifteen EDs and urgent care centres (referred collectively as EDs) located in the province of Manitoba, Canada were selected for this study. Results: medical errors occurred at each ED but to different extents; ED teams had low temporal stability; TMS and medical errors were not statistically significant, but worked experience captured by the individual team competence index (ITCI) decreased time to physician and length of stay was. TMS had a negative moderating effect on ITCI and neither TMS nor ITCI were statistically significant when patient volumes and levels of acuity were controlled. In contrast, when team size was controlled, TMS had a large effect size on time to physician. Conclusion: low TMS was not a significant factor in medical errors measured as delays to care but probably related to other organizational factors and team dynamics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨专业团队成员稳定性与急诊科医疗差错
在急诊科(EDs)延误护理和治疗可能导致伤害患者的医疗错误。为了优化ED的结果,存在一些指标来定义患者应该评估、接受治疗和出院的时间框架,其中包括分诊时间、医生评估时间(PIA)和出院时间。本研究的目的是探讨颞叶经颅磁刺激与急诊科医疗差错(延迟护理)之间的关系。方法:采用非实验、定量、横断面和相关研究设计来研究由于轮班工作时间表(即经颅磁刺激)导致的IP团队成员差异与作为急诊科患者结果的医疗差错之间的关系。本研究选择了加拿大马尼托巴省的15个急诊科和紧急护理中心(统称为急诊科)。结果:各急诊科均发生医疗差错,但程度不同;急诊科的时间稳定性较低;经颅磁刺激与医疗差错无统计学意义,但个人团队能力指数(ITCI)捕获的工作经验减少了就诊时间和住院时间。TMS对ITCI有负调节作用,当患者体积和视力水平被控制时,TMS和ITCI均无统计学意义。相比之下,当团队规模受到控制时,经颅磁刺激对医生的时间有很大的影响。结论:低经颅磁刺激不是医疗差错延误的显著因素,但可能与其他组织因素和团队动力学有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Response-shift effect for self-assessment: Magnitude and accuracy within an interprofessional education course Interprofessional heart failure education for self-care knowledge and medication adherence in cardiac rehabiliation patients: A short report How team-based are rural or underserved clinics where AHEC scholars train? Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B) Advancing interprofessional workplace learning: Successful implementation of the ‘WILD Series©’ hybrid professional development model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1