Healthcare practitioners’ perceptions of inter-professional collaborative practices in hospitals

Rika Yulia , Fauna Herawati , Setiasih , Astrid Pratidina Susilo , Retnosari Andrajati , Diantha Soemantri
{"title":"Healthcare practitioners’ perceptions of inter-professional collaborative practices in hospitals","authors":"Rika Yulia ,&nbsp;Fauna Herawati ,&nbsp;Setiasih ,&nbsp;Astrid Pratidina Susilo ,&nbsp;Retnosari Andrajati ,&nbsp;Diantha Soemantri","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is believed that positive interactions and exchanges of information within a healthcare team contribute to good quality care in any context. In Indonesia, there may be limitations on interaction and information exchange because of the hierarchical structure of organizations. Culture, hierarchy, and perceived rank affect how individuals behave and interact among professions in healthcare teams. This study aimed to identify the perceptions of each profession on the practice of inter-professional collaboration in their respective work units.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study was conducted among health care practitioners<span><span> involved in antibiotic use in hospitals. Data were collected using the Collaborative-Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) questionnaire of eight domains (53 questions). The correlation coefficient value for the 53 questions was &gt;0.3, with a significance level of 5%. The reliability of the CPAT questionnaire was good, with </span>Cronbach's alpha of 0.977.</span></p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>There were 261 respondents. The perception scores of each profession about inter-professional collaboration were 3.55–3.82. The domain that had the highest score was ‘the relationship between members'; and the lowest scores was ‘decision-making and conflict management’. A statistically significant difference was found in the perception towards the practice of inter-professional collaboration between pharmacists and other professions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Perceptions of inter-professional collaboration of each profession in hospitals differ. Communication between professions in distributing tasks and roles when interacting is needed so that each profession can contribute optimally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is believed that positive interactions and exchanges of information within a healthcare team contribute to good quality care in any context. In Indonesia, there may be limitations on interaction and information exchange because of the hierarchical structure of organizations. Culture, hierarchy, and perceived rank affect how individuals behave and interact among professions in healthcare teams. This study aimed to identify the perceptions of each profession on the practice of inter-professional collaboration in their respective work units.

Method

The study was conducted among health care practitioners involved in antibiotic use in hospitals. Data were collected using the Collaborative-Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) questionnaire of eight domains (53 questions). The correlation coefficient value for the 53 questions was >0.3, with a significance level of 5%. The reliability of the CPAT questionnaire was good, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.977.

Result

There were 261 respondents. The perception scores of each profession about inter-professional collaboration were 3.55–3.82. The domain that had the highest score was ‘the relationship between members'; and the lowest scores was ‘decision-making and conflict management’. A statistically significant difference was found in the perception towards the practice of inter-professional collaboration between pharmacists and other professions.

Conclusion

Perceptions of inter-professional collaboration of each profession in hospitals differ. Communication between professions in distributing tasks and roles when interacting is needed so that each profession can contribute optimally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健从业者对医院跨专业合作实践的看法
人们相信,在任何情况下,医疗团队内部的积极互动和信息交流有助于提供高质量的护理。在印度尼西亚,由于组织的等级结构,相互作用和信息交换可能受到限制。文化、等级和感知等级影响个人在医疗保健团队中职业之间的行为和互动方式。本研究旨在确定每个专业在各自工作单位中对跨专业合作实践的看法。方法对医院中涉及抗生素使用的医护人员进行调查。数据收集使用协作-实践评估工具(CPAT)问卷八个领域(53个问题)。53题的相关系数值为0.3,显著性水平为5%。CPAT问卷信度较好,Cronbach's alpha为0.977。结果共261名被调查者。各专业对跨专业协作的感知得分在3.55 ~ 3.82之间。得分最高的领域是“成员之间的关系”;得分最低的是“决策和冲突管理”。药师与其他职业对跨专业合作实践的认知差异有统计学意义。结论医院各专业对跨专业合作的认知存在差异。在相互作用时,需要在分配任务和角色时进行专业之间的沟通,以便每个专业都能做出最佳贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Response-shift effect for self-assessment: Magnitude and accuracy within an interprofessional education course Interprofessional heart failure education for self-care knowledge and medication adherence in cardiac rehabiliation patients: A short report How team-based are rural or underserved clinics where AHEC scholars train? Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B) Advancing interprofessional workplace learning: Successful implementation of the ‘WILD Series©’ hybrid professional development model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1