Optimal insurance design under mean-variance preference with narrow framing

IF 1.9 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Insurance Mathematics & Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2023.06.002
Xiaoqing Liang , Wenjun Jiang , Yiying Zhang
{"title":"Optimal insurance design under mean-variance preference with narrow framing","authors":"Xiaoqing Liang ,&nbsp;Wenjun Jiang ,&nbsp;Yiying Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we study an optimal insurance design problem under mean-variance criterion by considering the local gain-loss utility of the net payoff of insurance, namely, narrow framing. We extend the existing results in the literature to the case where the decision maker has mean-variance preference with a constraint on the expected utility of the net payoff of insurance, where the premium is determined by the mean-variance premium principle. We first show the existence and uniqueness of the optimal solution to the main problem studied in the paper. We find that the optimal indemnity function involves a deductible provided that the safety loading imposed on the “mean part” of the premium principle is strictly positive. Our main result shows that narrow framing indeed reduces the demand for insurance. The explicit optimal indemnity functions are derived under two special local gain-loss utility functions – the quadratic utility function and the piecewise linear utility function. As a spin-off result, the Bowley solution is also derived for a Stackelberg game between the decision maker and the insurer under the quadratic local gain-loss utility function. Several numerical examples are presented to further analyze the effects of narrow framing on the optimal indemnity function as well as the interests of both parties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54974,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668723000574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we study an optimal insurance design problem under mean-variance criterion by considering the local gain-loss utility of the net payoff of insurance, namely, narrow framing. We extend the existing results in the literature to the case where the decision maker has mean-variance preference with a constraint on the expected utility of the net payoff of insurance, where the premium is determined by the mean-variance premium principle. We first show the existence and uniqueness of the optimal solution to the main problem studied in the paper. We find that the optimal indemnity function involves a deductible provided that the safety loading imposed on the “mean part” of the premium principle is strictly positive. Our main result shows that narrow framing indeed reduces the demand for insurance. The explicit optimal indemnity functions are derived under two special local gain-loss utility functions – the quadratic utility function and the piecewise linear utility function. As a spin-off result, the Bowley solution is also derived for a Stackelberg game between the decision maker and the insurer under the quadratic local gain-loss utility function. Several numerical examples are presented to further analyze the effects of narrow framing on the optimal indemnity function as well as the interests of both parties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
窄框架下均值方差偏好下的最优保险设计
本文通过考虑保险净收益的局部损益效用,即窄框架,研究了均值-方差准则下的最优保险设计问题。我们将文献中的现有结果扩展到决策者具有均值-方差偏好并约束保险净收益的期望效用的情况,其中保费由均值-方差保费原则决定。首先证明了本文研究的主要问题最优解的存在唯一性。我们发现最优赔偿函数包含一个可抵扣额,只要附加在保险原则的“平均部分”上的安全负荷是严格正的。我们的主要结果表明,狭义框架确实降低了保险需求。在两种特殊的局部增益-损失效用函数——二次效用函数和分段线性效用函数下,导出了显式最优补偿函数。作为衍生结果,本文还推导了决策者与保险人在二次局部收益-损失效用函数下的Stackelberg博弈的Bowley解。通过几个算例进一步分析了窄框架对最优补偿函数和双方利益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Mathematics & Economics
Insurance Mathematics & Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
17.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes leading research spanning all fields of actuarial science research. It appears six times per year and is the largest journal in actuarial science research around the world. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is an international academic journal that aims to strengthen the communication between individuals and groups who develop and apply research results in actuarial science. The journal feels a particular obligation to facilitate closer cooperation between those who conduct research in insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics, and practicing actuaries who are interested in the implementation of the results. To this purpose, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes high-quality articles of broad international interest, concerned with either the theory of insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics or the inventive application of it, including empirical or experimental results. Articles that combine several of these aspects are particularly considered.
期刊最新文献
A new characterization of second-order stochastic dominance Bivariate Tail Conditional Co-Expectation for elliptical distributions Egalitarian pooling and sharing of longevity risk a.k.a. can an administrator help skin the tontine cat? A two-layer stochastic game approach to reinsurance contracting and competition Optimal insurance design under asymmetric Nash bargaining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1