Development of a conceptual framework to guide description and evaluation of social interventions for people with serious mental health conditions

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100271
Rebecca Appleton , Phoebe Barnett , Beverley Chipp , Michael Clark , Peter Goldblatt , Stephen Jeffreys , Karen Machin , Justin J. Needle , Prisha Shah , Georgina Thompson , Kylee Trevillion , Martin Webber , Minnie Worden , Sonia Johnson , Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
{"title":"Development of a conceptual framework to guide description and evaluation of social interventions for people with serious mental health conditions","authors":"Rebecca Appleton ,&nbsp;Phoebe Barnett ,&nbsp;Beverley Chipp ,&nbsp;Michael Clark ,&nbsp;Peter Goldblatt ,&nbsp;Stephen Jeffreys ,&nbsp;Karen Machin ,&nbsp;Justin J. Needle ,&nbsp;Prisha Shah ,&nbsp;Georgina Thompson ,&nbsp;Kylee Trevillion ,&nbsp;Martin Webber ,&nbsp;Minnie Worden ,&nbsp;Sonia Johnson ,&nbsp;Brynmor Lloyd-Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People with serious mental health conditions face social exclusion and have poorer social outcomes compared to the general population in several areas of life. Social exclusion also negatively impacts mental health. Promising models of support to improve social outcomes for people with serious mental health conditions have been described in the literature and proliferate in practice, but typologies of support are not clearly established and a robust evidence base for effective approaches is lacking in many areas. We conducted a scoping review of relevant literature and consulted with experts in the field to identify models to improve social circumstances across eight life domains, with the aim of developing a conceptual framework to distinguish the main broad approaches to improving the social circumstances of people with serious mental health conditions. We also sought to explore which approaches have been used in models within each life domain. This work was conducted in collaboration with a group of expert stakeholders, including people with lived experience of accessing mental health services. We developed a conceptual framework which distinguishes sources and types of support, allowing description of complex interventions to improve the social circumstances of people with serious mental health problems, and providing a framework to guide future service development and evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560323000865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with serious mental health conditions face social exclusion and have poorer social outcomes compared to the general population in several areas of life. Social exclusion also negatively impacts mental health. Promising models of support to improve social outcomes for people with serious mental health conditions have been described in the literature and proliferate in practice, but typologies of support are not clearly established and a robust evidence base for effective approaches is lacking in many areas. We conducted a scoping review of relevant literature and consulted with experts in the field to identify models to improve social circumstances across eight life domains, with the aim of developing a conceptual framework to distinguish the main broad approaches to improving the social circumstances of people with serious mental health conditions. We also sought to explore which approaches have been used in models within each life domain. This work was conducted in collaboration with a group of expert stakeholders, including people with lived experience of accessing mental health services. We developed a conceptual framework which distinguishes sources and types of support, allowing description of complex interventions to improve the social circumstances of people with serious mental health problems, and providing a framework to guide future service development and evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定一个概念框架,以指导对患有严重精神健康状况的人进行社会干预的描述和评价
与一般人群相比,患有严重精神健康问题的人在生活的几个领域面临社会排斥,社会结果也较差。社会排斥也对心理健康产生负面影响。文献中描述了有希望的支持模式,以改善严重精神健康状况患者的社会结果,并在实践中扩散,但支持的类型学尚未明确建立,许多领域缺乏有效方法的有力证据基础。我们对相关文献进行了范围审查,并咨询了该领域的专家,以确定在八个生活领域改善社会环境的模型,目的是建立一个概念框架,以区分改善严重精神健康状况患者社会环境的主要方法。我们还试图探索在每个生命领域的模型中使用了哪些方法。这项工作是与一组专家利益攸关方合作开展的,其中包括有获得精神卫生服务的亲身经历的人。我们制定了一个概念框架,区分支持的来源和类型,允许描述复杂的干预措施,以改善有严重精神健康问题的人的社会环境,并提供一个框架来指导未来的服务开发和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
State-level variation in the prevalence of child psychopathology symptoms in the US: Results from the ABCD study Perceptions around occupational mental well-being of community health workers and an intervention package for its promotion: A mixed-methods study in rural Chiapas, Mexico The ties that bind: Understanding the mental health consequences of the Windrush Scandal and hostile immigration policies on survivors in the UK Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce Understanding depression and the PHQ-9 items among people living with HIV: A multiple methods qualitative study in Yaoundé, Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1