A rewriting logic approach to specification, proof-search, and meta-proofs in sequent systems

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jlamp.2022.100827
Carlos Olarte , Elaine Pimentel , Camilo Rocha
{"title":"A rewriting logic approach to specification, proof-search, and meta-proofs in sequent systems","authors":"Carlos Olarte ,&nbsp;Elaine Pimentel ,&nbsp;Camilo Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.jlamp.2022.100827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper develops an algorithmic-based approach for proving inductive properties of propositional sequent systems such as admissibility, invertibility, cut-admissibility, and identity expansion. Although undecidable in general, these structural properties are crucial in proof theory because they can reduce the proof-search effort and further be used as scaffolding for obtaining other meta-results such as consistency. The algorithms –which take advantage of the rewriting logic meta-logical framework– are explained in detail and illustrated with examples throughout the paper. They have been fully mechanized in the <span>L-Framework</span>, thus offering both a formal specification language and off-the-shelf mechanization of the proof-search algorithms coming together with semi-decision procedures for proving theorems and meta-theorems of the object system. As illustrated with case studies in the paper, the <span>L-Framework</span> achieves a great degree of automation when used on several propositional sequent systems, including single conclusion and multi-conclusion intuitionistic logic, classical logic, classical linear logic and its dyadic system, intuitionistic linear logic, and normal modal logics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 100827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352220822000803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper develops an algorithmic-based approach for proving inductive properties of propositional sequent systems such as admissibility, invertibility, cut-admissibility, and identity expansion. Although undecidable in general, these structural properties are crucial in proof theory because they can reduce the proof-search effort and further be used as scaffolding for obtaining other meta-results such as consistency. The algorithms –which take advantage of the rewriting logic meta-logical framework– are explained in detail and illustrated with examples throughout the paper. They have been fully mechanized in the L-Framework, thus offering both a formal specification language and off-the-shelf mechanization of the proof-search algorithms coming together with semi-decision procedures for proving theorems and meta-theorems of the object system. As illustrated with case studies in the paper, the L-Framework achieves a great degree of automation when used on several propositional sequent systems, including single conclusion and multi-conclusion intuitionistic logic, classical logic, classical linear logic and its dyadic system, intuitionistic linear logic, and normal modal logics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺序系统中规范、证明搜索和元证明的重写逻辑方法
本文提出了一种基于算法的方法来证明命题序列系统的可容许性、可逆性、切容许性和恒等展开等归纳性质。虽然一般来说是不可判定的,但这些结构性质在证明理论中是至关重要的,因为它们可以减少证明搜索的工作量,并进一步用作获得其他元结果(如一致性)的脚手架。算法-利用重写逻辑元逻辑框架-被详细解释,并在整个论文中用例子说明。它们在L-Framework中已经完全机械化,因此提供了一种正式的规范语言和现成的证明搜索算法机械化,这些算法与用于证明对象系统的定理和元定理的半决策过程结合在一起。通过实例研究表明,l -框架在单结论和多结论直觉逻辑、经典逻辑、经典线性逻辑和它的二元系统、直觉线性逻辑和正态模态逻辑等命题序列系统中实现了很大程度的自动化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming
Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-LOGIC
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming is an international journal whose aim is to publish high quality, original research papers, survey and review articles, tutorial expositions, and historical studies in the areas of logical and algebraic methods and techniques for guaranteeing correctness and performability of programs and in general of computing systems. All aspects will be covered, especially theory and foundations, implementation issues, and applications involving novel ideas.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Generation of algebraic data type values using evolutionary algorithms Logic and Calculi for All on the occasion of Luís Barbosa’s 60th birthday First order Büchi automata and their application to verification of LTL specifications Tuning similarity-based fuzzy logic programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1