A note on Lorentz transformations and simultaneity in classical physics and special relativity

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE The European Physical Journal H Pub Date : 2019-09-25 DOI:10.1140/epjh/e2019-90058-4
Angelo Pagano, Emanuele V. Pagano
{"title":"A note on Lorentz transformations and simultaneity in classical physics and special relativity","authors":"Angelo Pagano,&nbsp;Emanuele V. Pagano","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2019-90058-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\nSince early models of wave propagation in both stationary and moving media during the nineteenth century, the Lorentz transformation (<i>LT</i>) has played a key role in describing characteristic wave phenomena, e.g., the Doppler shift effect. In these models <i>LT</i> connects two different events generated by wave propagations, as observed in two reference systems and the synchronism is absolute. In relativistic physics <i>LT</i> implements the relativity principle. As a consequence, it connects two space-time event coordinates that both correspond to the same physical event and <i>“absolute synchronization”</i> is not allowed. The relativistic interpretation started from Einstein’s early criticism of the notion of <i>“simultaneity”</i> and Minkowski’s invariance of the space-time interval. In this paper, the two different roles of <i>LT</i>, i.e., in classical wave propagation theories and in relativistic physics, are discussed. Einstein’s early criticism is also re-examined with respect to <i>LT</i> in view of its significance for the notion of <i>simultaneity</i>. Indeed, that early criticism is found to be defective. Our analysis is also useful for general readers in view of its impact on modern speculations about the existence of a preferred system of reference Σ, where light propagation is isotropic, and related implications.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"44 4-5","pages":"321 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2019-90058-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal H","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/e2019-90058-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since early models of wave propagation in both stationary and moving media during the nineteenth century, the Lorentz transformation (LT) has played a key role in describing characteristic wave phenomena, e.g., the Doppler shift effect. In these models LT connects two different events generated by wave propagations, as observed in two reference systems and the synchronism is absolute. In relativistic physics LT implements the relativity principle. As a consequence, it connects two space-time event coordinates that both correspond to the same physical event and “absolute synchronization” is not allowed. The relativistic interpretation started from Einstein’s early criticism of the notion of “simultaneity” and Minkowski’s invariance of the space-time interval. In this paper, the two different roles of LT, i.e., in classical wave propagation theories and in relativistic physics, are discussed. Einstein’s early criticism is also re-examined with respect to LT in view of its significance for the notion of simultaneity. Indeed, that early criticism is found to be defective. Our analysis is also useful for general readers in view of its impact on modern speculations about the existence of a preferred system of reference Σ, where light propagation is isotropic, and related implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经典物理和狭义相对论中的洛伦兹变换和同时性注释
自从19世纪在静止和运动介质中建立早期的波传播模型以来,洛伦兹变换(LT)在描述特征波现象(如多普勒频移效应)方面发挥了关键作用。在这些模型中,正如在两个参考系统中观察到的那样,LT连接了由波传播产生的两个不同事件,并且同步性是绝对的。在相对论物理学中,LT实现相对性原理。因此,它连接了两个时空事件坐标,它们都对应于同一个物理事件,“绝对同步”是不允许的。相对论的解释始于爱因斯坦早期对“同时性”概念的批判和闵可夫斯基时空间隔的不变性。本文讨论了LT在经典波传播理论和相对论物理中的两种不同作用。爱因斯坦早期的批评也被重新审视,考虑到它对同时性概念的重要性。事实上,人们发现早期的批评是有缺陷的。我们的分析对一般读者也是有用的,因为它对关于优选参考系统Σ存在的现代推测的影响,其中光传播是各向同性的,以及相关的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal H
The European Physical Journal H HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of this journal is to catalyse, foster, and disseminate an awareness and understanding of the historical development of ideas in contemporary physics, and more generally, ideas about how Nature works. The scope explicitly includes: - Contributions addressing the history of physics and of physical ideas and concepts, the interplay of physics and mathematics as well as the natural sciences, and the history and philosophy of sciences, together with discussions of experimental ideas and designs - inasmuch as they clearly relate, and preferably add, to the understanding of modern physics. - Annotated and/or contextual translations of relevant foreign-language texts. - Careful characterisations of old and/or abandoned ideas including past mistakes and false leads, thereby helping working physicists to assess how compelling contemporary ideas may turn out to be in future, i.e. with hindsight.
期刊最新文献
Equilibria and the protomodel of the Sun’s atmosphere by Karl Schwarzschild in hindsight A commented translation of Boltzmann’s work, “Ueber die sogenannte H-Curve.” Bohr and von Neumann on the universality of quantum mechanics: materials for the history of the quantum measurement process From history of physics to “history for physics” The drama of ideas in the history of quantum gravity: Niels Bohr, Lev Landau, and Matvei Bronstein
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1