Sensitivity of benchmarked behavioral assays for distress: Should we attend to certain behaviors during exams?

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jveb.2023.06.012
Fiia Jokela , Pierrette Mercier , Lynn Honeckman , Arthur E. Dunham , Karen L. Overall
{"title":"Sensitivity of benchmarked behavioral assays for distress: Should we attend to certain behaviors during exams?","authors":"Fiia Jokela ,&nbsp;Pierrette Mercier ,&nbsp;Lynn Honeckman ,&nbsp;Arthur E. Dunham ,&nbsp;Karen L. Overall","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2023.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Behavioral, emotional, and physical signs of distress are increasingly recognized in veterinary patients during routine care. Visits to veterinarians<span> are associated with development or worsening of fearful behaviors. Veterinary patients experiencing fear and distress create a welfare concern. These negative emotional states may result in deferred veterinary care and incomplete veterinary evaluations. This study is part of our ongoing series of studies on assessing fear and distress in clinical situations using one population of dogs. We sought to evaluate whether there was one or a subset of behaviors in a benchmarked, behavioral scale that best predicted or correlated with a 5-point, subjective, ordinal scale. Both scales were used to evaluate each dog’s behavior throughout a 10-step standardized physical exam. Here we discuss the association between global scoring and the more detailed physical exam scoring. We evaluated dogs (n = 35) that were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study testing a novel pharmaceutical intervention for fear associated with veterinary exams. In the original study, the dogs were videotaped at the baseline visit and 2</span></span> <span>weeks later at the interventional visit. All videos were coded and blinded. For the purposes of our study, the order of the exams and whether the dogs received placebo, or the novel compound were not revealed. Four people evaluated all videos: three residents and an experienced specialist/researcher who participated in the original pharmaceutical study. The benchmarked behavioral scales indicated that dogs with low body or tail posture (scores of 4-5) during the paw-lift stage of the physical exam, stayed aroused for all subsequent parts of the exam. This was not the case for dogs with lower scores when their paws were lifted. A score of 4 or 5 for tail and/or body posture is a sensitive predictor of future exam behavior in this context, and lifting a paw appears to be a provocative intervention for many fearful dogs. These key behaviors are sufficiently informative so that these should be evaluated at specified exam stages during a standardized exam, as part of a valid baseline behavioral database.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823000874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral, emotional, and physical signs of distress are increasingly recognized in veterinary patients during routine care. Visits to veterinarians are associated with development or worsening of fearful behaviors. Veterinary patients experiencing fear and distress create a welfare concern. These negative emotional states may result in deferred veterinary care and incomplete veterinary evaluations. This study is part of our ongoing series of studies on assessing fear and distress in clinical situations using one population of dogs. We sought to evaluate whether there was one or a subset of behaviors in a benchmarked, behavioral scale that best predicted or correlated with a 5-point, subjective, ordinal scale. Both scales were used to evaluate each dog’s behavior throughout a 10-step standardized physical exam. Here we discuss the association between global scoring and the more detailed physical exam scoring. We evaluated dogs (n = 35) that were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study testing a novel pharmaceutical intervention for fear associated with veterinary exams. In the original study, the dogs were videotaped at the baseline visit and 2 weeks later at the interventional visit. All videos were coded and blinded. For the purposes of our study, the order of the exams and whether the dogs received placebo, or the novel compound were not revealed. Four people evaluated all videos: three residents and an experienced specialist/researcher who participated in the original pharmaceutical study. The benchmarked behavioral scales indicated that dogs with low body or tail posture (scores of 4-5) during the paw-lift stage of the physical exam, stayed aroused for all subsequent parts of the exam. This was not the case for dogs with lower scores when their paws were lifted. A score of 4 or 5 for tail and/or body posture is a sensitive predictor of future exam behavior in this context, and lifting a paw appears to be a provocative intervention for many fearful dogs. These key behaviors are sufficiently informative so that these should be evaluated at specified exam stages during a standardized exam, as part of a valid baseline behavioral database.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对痛苦的基准行为分析的敏感性:我们应该在考试期间注意某些行为吗?
在兽医病人的日常护理中,行为、情绪和身体上的痛苦迹象越来越多地被认识到。去看兽医与恐惧行为的发展或恶化有关。经历恐惧和痛苦的兽医病人创造了福利问题。这些消极的情绪状态可能导致延迟兽医护理和不完整的兽医评估。这项研究是我们正在进行的一系列研究的一部分,这些研究是利用一群狗来评估临床情况下的恐惧和痛苦。我们试图评估基准行为量表中是否有一种或一种行为子集最能预测或与5分主观有序量表相关。这两种量表都被用来评估每只狗在10步标准化体格检查中的行为。在这里,我们讨论整体评分和更详细的体检评分之间的关系。我们对狗(n = 35)进行了评估,这些狗参加了一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究,测试一种新型药物干预与兽医检查相关的恐惧。在最初的研究中,狗在基线访问和2周后的介入访问时被录像。所有视频都经过编码和盲化处理。为了我们研究的目的,测试的顺序以及狗是服用安慰剂还是新化合物都没有透露。四个人评估了所有的视频:三名住院医生和一名参与原始药物研究的经验丰富的专家/研究员。基准行为量表显示,在身体检查的举爪阶段,低身姿或低尾姿(得分4-5分)的狗在随后的所有测试中都保持唤醒状态。对于那些得分较低的狗来说,当它们的爪子被抬起时,情况就不同了。在这种情况下,尾巴和/或身体姿势的得分为4或5分是对未来考试行为的敏感预测,对许多害怕的狗来说,抬起爪子似乎是一种挑衅性的干预。这些关键行为具有足够的信息量,因此应该在标准化考试的特定考试阶段对其进行评估,作为有效基线行为数据库的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
期刊最新文献
Using positive reinforcement to increase inhaler tolerance and medicine adherence in a domestic short hair cat (Felis catus) with asthma Behavioral traits of rescue dogs from Southern and Eastern Europe rehomed to Germany Qualitative evaluation of the behavior of stockpersons and young dairy heifers reared in tropical conditions Analysis of the jumping performance of young warmblood horses based on the results of breeding competitions in the Czech Republic Association between training methods and owner-reported problem behaviours in dogs enrolled in the ‘Generation Pup’ longitudinal study in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1