Interprofessional simulation to prepare students to address medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy

Nicholas M. Fusco , Kelly Foltz-Ramos , Jessica S. Kruger , Alison Vargovich , William A. Prescott Jr.
{"title":"Interprofessional simulation to prepare students to address medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy","authors":"Nicholas M. Fusco ,&nbsp;Kelly Foltz-Ramos ,&nbsp;Jessica S. Kruger ,&nbsp;Alison Vargovich ,&nbsp;William A. Prescott Jr.","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Medical misinformation, which contributes to vaccine hesitancy, is widespread and promulgated by the internet and social networks. Patients trust health professionals, and the healthcare community is therefore well positioned to address misinformation and to advocate for </span>vaccination<span>. Health professions students may lack the knowledge and/or confidence to communicate with vaccine-hesitant individuals whose position is based on misinformation. We sought to develop, implement, and assess an interprofessional educational program aimed at preparing health professions students to address medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. Our program was competency-based, interprofessional and employed a hybrid instructional design that included asynchronous online modules, virtual simulation, and in-person simulation. A pre/post-survey and 10-question pre/post-quiz were administered to assess achievement of the learning outcomes and impact of the program. Fifty-one students participated in the program, including students from medicine (n = 12), nursing (n = 12), pharmacy (n = 13), and </span></span>public health (n = 14). Following participation, 98% and 96% of students indicated that their ability to address medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy, respectively, was better than it was before completing the program. Mean self-assessed abilities increased from a mean of 2.7/5 (fair-to-good) before the program to a mean of 4/5 (very good) following participation. The proportion of students who rated their ability to respond to a vaccine-hesitant individual as being “very good” or “excellent” increased from 6% before to 73% following the program. Participant knowledge, as based on the pre/post-quiz, increased from 44% before to 60% after the program. Our program resulted in improvement in student self-efficacy in addressing medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. Students felt this program was impactful and provided them with translatable skills to their clinical experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical misinformation, which contributes to vaccine hesitancy, is widespread and promulgated by the internet and social networks. Patients trust health professionals, and the healthcare community is therefore well positioned to address misinformation and to advocate for vaccination. Health professions students may lack the knowledge and/or confidence to communicate with vaccine-hesitant individuals whose position is based on misinformation. We sought to develop, implement, and assess an interprofessional educational program aimed at preparing health professions students to address medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. Our program was competency-based, interprofessional and employed a hybrid instructional design that included asynchronous online modules, virtual simulation, and in-person simulation. A pre/post-survey and 10-question pre/post-quiz were administered to assess achievement of the learning outcomes and impact of the program. Fifty-one students participated in the program, including students from medicine (n = 12), nursing (n = 12), pharmacy (n = 13), and public health (n = 14). Following participation, 98% and 96% of students indicated that their ability to address medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy, respectively, was better than it was before completing the program. Mean self-assessed abilities increased from a mean of 2.7/5 (fair-to-good) before the program to a mean of 4/5 (very good) following participation. The proportion of students who rated their ability to respond to a vaccine-hesitant individual as being “very good” or “excellent” increased from 6% before to 73% following the program. Participant knowledge, as based on the pre/post-quiz, increased from 44% before to 60% after the program. Our program resulted in improvement in student self-efficacy in addressing medical misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. Students felt this program was impactful and provided them with translatable skills to their clinical experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨专业模拟,准备学生解决医疗错误信息和疫苗犹豫
互联网和社交网络广泛传播和传播的医学错误信息导致人们对疫苗接种犹豫不决。患者信任卫生专业人员,因此,卫生保健社区处于有利地位,可以解决错误信息并倡导接种疫苗。卫生专业的学生可能缺乏知识和/或信心与基于错误信息的疫苗犹豫者沟通。我们试图开发、实施和评估一个跨专业的教育项目,旨在帮助卫生专业的学生解决医疗错误信息和疫苗犹豫问题。我们的课程以能力为基础,跨专业,采用混合教学设计,包括异步在线模块,虚拟模拟和现场模拟。进行了前后调查和10个问题的前后测验,以评估学习成果的成就和项目的影响。51名学生参加了该项目,包括医学(n = 12)、护理(n = 12)、药学(n = 13)和公共卫生(n = 14)专业的学生。参与后,98%和96%的学生分别表示,他们解决医疗错误信息和疫苗犹豫的能力比完成项目前更好。平均自我评估能力从项目前的平均2.7/5(尚可)提高到项目参与后的平均4/5(非常好)。认为自己对疫苗犹豫者的反应能力“非常好”或“优秀”的学生比例从项目前的6%增加到项目后的73%。根据测试前和测试后,参与者的知识从测试前的44%增加到测试后的60%。我们的项目提高了学生在解决医疗错误信息和疫苗犹豫方面的自我效能感。学生们觉得这个项目很有影响力,并为他们提供了可转化为临床经验的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Response-shift effect for self-assessment: Magnitude and accuracy within an interprofessional education course Interprofessional heart failure education for self-care knowledge and medication adherence in cardiac rehabiliation patients: A short report How team-based are rural or underserved clinics where AHEC scholars train? Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B) Advancing interprofessional workplace learning: Successful implementation of the ‘WILD Series©’ hybrid professional development model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1