From tabular data to knowledge graphs: A survey of semantic table interpretation tasks and methods

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Web Semantics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.websem.2022.100761
Jixiong Liu , Yoan Chabot , Raphaël Troncy , Viet-Phi Huynh , Thomas Labbé , Pierre Monnin
{"title":"From tabular data to knowledge graphs: A survey of semantic table interpretation tasks and methods","authors":"Jixiong Liu ,&nbsp;Yoan Chabot ,&nbsp;Raphaël Troncy ,&nbsp;Viet-Phi Huynh ,&nbsp;Thomas Labbé ,&nbsp;Pierre Monnin","doi":"10.1016/j.websem.2022.100761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tabular data often refers to data that is organized in a table with rows and columns. We observe that this data format<span> is widely used on the Web and within enterprise data repositories. Tables potentially contain rich semantic information that still needs to be interpreted. The process of extracting meaningful information out of tabular data with respect to a semantic artefact, such as an ontology or a knowledge graph, is often referred to as Semantic Table Interpretation (STI) or Semantic Table Annotation. In this survey paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date state-of-the-art review of the different tasks and methods that have been proposed so far to perform STI. First, we propose a new categorization that reflects the heterogeneity of table types that one can encounter, revealing different challenges that need to be addressed. Next, we define five major sub-tasks that STI deals with even if the literature has mostly focused on three sub-tasks so far. We review and group the many approaches that have been proposed into three macro families and we discuss their performance and limitations with respect to the various datasets and benchmarks proposed by the community. Finally, we detail what are the remaining scientific barriers to be able to truly automatically interpret any type of tables that can be found in the wild Web.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Semantics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826822000452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Tabular data often refers to data that is organized in a table with rows and columns. We observe that this data format is widely used on the Web and within enterprise data repositories. Tables potentially contain rich semantic information that still needs to be interpreted. The process of extracting meaningful information out of tabular data with respect to a semantic artefact, such as an ontology or a knowledge graph, is often referred to as Semantic Table Interpretation (STI) or Semantic Table Annotation. In this survey paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date state-of-the-art review of the different tasks and methods that have been proposed so far to perform STI. First, we propose a new categorization that reflects the heterogeneity of table types that one can encounter, revealing different challenges that need to be addressed. Next, we define five major sub-tasks that STI deals with even if the literature has mostly focused on three sub-tasks so far. We review and group the many approaches that have been proposed into three macro families and we discuss their performance and limitations with respect to the various datasets and benchmarks proposed by the community. Finally, we detail what are the remaining scientific barriers to be able to truly automatically interpret any type of tables that can be found in the wild Web.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从表格数据到知识图谱:语义表解释任务和方法综述
表格数据通常指在具有行和列的表中组织的数据。我们观察到,这种数据格式在Web和企业数据存储库中被广泛使用。表可能包含仍需解释的丰富语义信息。从表格数据中提取关于语义人工制品(如本体或知识图)的有意义信息的过程通常被称为语义表解释(STI)或语义表注释。在这份调查文件中,我们旨在对迄今为止提出的执行STI的不同任务和方法进行全面和最新的最新审查。首先,我们提出了一种新的分类,它反映了可能遇到的表类型的异构性,揭示了需要解决的不同挑战。接下来,我们定义了STI处理的五个主要子任务,即使到目前为止文献主要集中在三个子任务上。我们将已经提出的许多方法分为三个宏观家族进行审查和分组,并讨论它们相对于社区提出的各种数据集和基准的性能和局限性。最后,我们详细介绍了能够真正自动解释野生网络中任何类型的表的剩余科学障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Web Semantics
Journal of Web Semantics 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
14.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Web Semantics is an interdisciplinary journal based on research and applications of various subject areas that contribute to the development of a knowledge-intensive and intelligent service Web. These areas include: knowledge technologies, ontology, agents, databases and the semantic grid, obviously disciplines like information retrieval, language technology, human-computer interaction and knowledge discovery are of major relevance as well. All aspects of the Semantic Web development are covered. The publication of large-scale experiments and their analysis is also encouraged to clearly illustrate scenarios and methods that introduce semantics into existing Web interfaces, contents and services. The journal emphasizes the publication of papers that combine theories, methods and experiments from different subject areas in order to deliver innovative semantic methods and applications.
期刊最新文献
Uniqorn: Unified question answering over RDF knowledge graphs and natural language text KAE: A property-based method for knowledge graph alignment and extension Multi-stream graph attention network for recommendation with knowledge graph Ontology design facilitating Wikibase integration — and a worked example for historical data Web3-DAO: An ontology for decentralized autonomous organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1