OSCAR (Osteopathic Single CAse Research) – Assessing the effect of standard and biopsychosocial osteopathic management for patients with non-specific low back pain: Protocol for a Single Case Experimental Design (SCED)

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100660
Jerry Draper-Rodi , Hilary Abbey , Kevin Brownhill , Steven Vogel
{"title":"OSCAR (Osteopathic Single CAse Research) – Assessing the effect of standard and biopsychosocial osteopathic management for patients with non-specific low back pain: Protocol for a Single Case Experimental Design (SCED)","authors":"Jerry Draper-Rodi ,&nbsp;Hilary Abbey ,&nbsp;Kevin Brownhill ,&nbsp;Steven Vogel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osteopathy has been shown to be effective in the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines recommend biopsychosocial care for chronic, complex musculoskeletal conditions, including non-specific LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study has four aims: 1/to assess how patients with LBP improve after osteopathic treatment, both before and after an osteopath has completed a Biopsychosocial Pain Management course; 2/to assess if it is feasible and acceptable for osteopaths to receive weekly SCED data and use it to guide patient management; 3/to assess if it is acceptable for patients to submit daily data and discuss weekly summary with their osteopaths; and 4/to test feasibility for researchers in collecting, managing and storing large quantities of individual patient data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multiple baseline single case experimental design trial with up to 10 UK osteopaths with more than 15 years in practice and 60 patients will assess how change occurs as a result of osteopathic treatment for patients with non-specific LBP of more than 12 weeks’ duration. Statistical analysis will assess the degree and rate of change between baseline, intervention and follow-up periods, and whether differences in effect are observed after the osteopaths have completed the biopsychosocial patient management training course. Primary outcomes will be the Numeric Pain Rating and Patient Specific Function Scales, measured daily at baseline and for 6 weeks during the intervention stage, and weekly or fortnightly during a 12-week follow-up period.</p></div><div><h3>Ethics</h3><p>This research was approved by the University College of Osteopathy Research Ethics Committee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068923000044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Osteopathy has been shown to be effective in the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines recommend biopsychosocial care for chronic, complex musculoskeletal conditions, including non-specific LBP.

Objectives

This study has four aims: 1/to assess how patients with LBP improve after osteopathic treatment, both before and after an osteopath has completed a Biopsychosocial Pain Management course; 2/to assess if it is feasible and acceptable for osteopaths to receive weekly SCED data and use it to guide patient management; 3/to assess if it is acceptable for patients to submit daily data and discuss weekly summary with their osteopaths; and 4/to test feasibility for researchers in collecting, managing and storing large quantities of individual patient data.

Methods

A multiple baseline single case experimental design trial with up to 10 UK osteopaths with more than 15 years in practice and 60 patients will assess how change occurs as a result of osteopathic treatment for patients with non-specific LBP of more than 12 weeks’ duration. Statistical analysis will assess the degree and rate of change between baseline, intervention and follow-up periods, and whether differences in effect are observed after the osteopaths have completed the biopsychosocial patient management training course. Primary outcomes will be the Numeric Pain Rating and Patient Specific Function Scales, measured daily at baseline and for 6 weeks during the intervention stage, and weekly or fortnightly during a 12-week follow-up period.

Ethics

This research was approved by the University College of Osteopathy Research Ethics Committee.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OSCAR(整骨疗法单例研究)-评估标准和生物心理社会整骨疗法治疗非特异性腰痛患者的效果:单例实验设计方案(SCED)
背景骨病已被证明在治疗慢性腰痛(LBP)方面是有效的。指南建议对慢性、复杂的肌肉骨骼疾病进行生物心理社会护理,包括非特异性LBP。目的本研究有四个目的:1/评估LBP患者在整骨治疗后,在整骨医生完成生物心理社会疼痛管理课程前后的改善情况;2/评估整骨医生每周接受SCED数据并用于指导患者管理是否可行和可接受;3/评估患者提交每日数据并与骨科医生讨论每周总结是否可以接受;以及4/测试研究人员在收集、管理和存储大量患者个人数据方面的可行性。方法一项多基线单病例实验设计试验,由10名执业时间超过15年的英国骨科医生和60名患者组成,将评估持续时间超过12周的非特异性LBP患者在整骨治疗后的变化。统计分析将评估基线、干预和随访期间的变化程度和速度,以及整骨医生完成生物-心理-社会患者管理培训课程后是否观察到效果差异。主要结果将是数字疼痛评分和患者特异性功能量表,在基线时每天测量,在干预阶段测量6周,在12周的随访期内每周或每两周测量一次。伦理这项研究得到了大学骨病学院研究伦理委员会的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Osteopathic manual treatment in women with endometriosis: A scoping review on clinical symptoms, fertility and quality of life The effectiveness of neuromuscular spinal manipulation- an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Osteopathic treatment of a person with Arnold-Chiari malformation and Syringomyelia: A case report Is visceral osteopathy therapy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis Professional skill priorities: Comparison views of osteopathy industry professionals and osteopathy students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1