Crowdsourced test case generation for android applications via static program analysis

IF 2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Automated Software Engineering Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s10515-023-00394-w
Yuying Li, Yang Feng, Chao Guo, Zhenyu Chen, Baowen Xu
{"title":"Crowdsourced test case generation for android applications via static program analysis","authors":"Yuying Li,&nbsp;Yang Feng,&nbsp;Chao Guo,&nbsp;Zhenyu Chen,&nbsp;Baowen Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10515-023-00394-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The testing of Android applications(apps) is a challenging task due to the serious fragmentation issues and diverse usage environments. To improve the testing efficiency and collect the feedbacks from real usage scenarios, crowdsourcing has been employed in the testing of Android. However, crowdsourced testing is a manual working paradigm, while the shortage of testing guidance for crowd workers who often have limited software engineering knowledge may result in many redundant or invalid test reports. To fill this gap, this paper presents an automated test case generation approach for the testing of Android apps. Our approach is built upon static program analysis and is capable of providing detailed testing steps to guide workers in performing testing. Furthermore, we use the automated testing tool for pre-testing, and crowd workers only need to test the uncovered test cases. We evaluate our approach with six widely-used apps to evaluate its effectiveness and efficiency. The experimental results show that our approach can detect 71.5% more bugs in diverse categories and achieve 21.8% higher path coverage in comparison with classic crowdsourced testing techniques. Also, in the experiment, we detect 44 unknown bugs in the six subjects, which indicates our approach is highly promising for assisting the testing of Android apps in practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10515-023-00394-w.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-023-00394-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The testing of Android applications(apps) is a challenging task due to the serious fragmentation issues and diverse usage environments. To improve the testing efficiency and collect the feedbacks from real usage scenarios, crowdsourcing has been employed in the testing of Android. However, crowdsourced testing is a manual working paradigm, while the shortage of testing guidance for crowd workers who often have limited software engineering knowledge may result in many redundant or invalid test reports. To fill this gap, this paper presents an automated test case generation approach for the testing of Android apps. Our approach is built upon static program analysis and is capable of providing detailed testing steps to guide workers in performing testing. Furthermore, we use the automated testing tool for pre-testing, and crowd workers only need to test the uncovered test cases. We evaluate our approach with six widely-used apps to evaluate its effectiveness and efficiency. The experimental results show that our approach can detect 71.5% more bugs in diverse categories and achieve 21.8% higher path coverage in comparison with classic crowdsourced testing techniques. Also, in the experiment, we detect 44 unknown bugs in the six subjects, which indicates our approach is highly promising for assisting the testing of Android apps in practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过静态程序分析为android应用程序生成众包测试用例
由于严重的碎片问题和多样化的使用环境,Android应用程序的测试是一项具有挑战性的任务。为了提高测试效率,收集真实使用场景的反馈,在Android的测试中采用了众包的方式。然而,众包测试是一种手工的工作范式,而缺乏对通常具有有限软件工程知识的众包工作者的测试指导可能会导致许多冗余或无效的测试报告。为了填补这一空白,本文提出了一种用于测试Android应用程序的自动化测试用例生成方法。我们的方法建立在静态程序分析的基础上,能够提供详细的测试步骤来指导工作人员执行测试。此外,我们使用自动化的测试工具进行预测试,而人群工作人员只需要测试未覆盖的测试用例。我们用六个广泛使用的应用程序来评估我们的方法,以评估其有效性和效率。实验结果表明,与传统的众包测试技术相比,我们的方法可以在不同类别中检测到71.5%的bug,并实现21.8%的路径覆盖率。此外,在实验中,我们在6个被试中发现了44个未知bug,这表明我们的方法在实际中非常有希望辅助Android应用的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Automated Software Engineering
Automated Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes. Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.
期刊最新文献
MP: motion program synthesis with machine learning interpretability and knowledge graph analogy LLM-enhanced evolutionary test generation for untyped languages Context-aware code summarization with multi-relational graph neural network Enhancing multi-objective test case selection through the mutation operator BadCodePrompt: backdoor attacks against prompt engineering of large language models for code generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1