Organizational Trust and Job Stress: a Preliminary Study Among Police Officers

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Asian Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2021-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s11417-021-09355-2
Eric G. Lambert, Hanif Qureshi, Mahesh K. Nalla, Mia Abboud Holbrook, James Frank
{"title":"Organizational Trust and Job Stress: a Preliminary Study Among Police Officers","authors":"Eric G. Lambert,&nbsp;Hanif Qureshi,&nbsp;Mahesh K. Nalla,&nbsp;Mia Abboud Holbrook,&nbsp;James Frank","doi":"10.1007/s11417-021-09355-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trust is a vital part of society and is critical for organizations. The main forms of organizational trust are management trust, supervisor trust, and coworker trust, each of which allows organizations to function and operate efficiently. This is particularly true for police agencies. Yet, few studies have examined how organizational trust affects police officers. The job of a police officer can be demanding, often resulting in heightened job stress. It is unclear whether organizational trust can reduce job stress or, conversely, whether low or non-existent organizational trust contributes to job stress. The current study explored the effects of management trust, supervisor trust, and coworker trust on job stress among Indian police officers, while also assessing the effects of job autonomy, views on quality training, role overload, role underload, and perceived dangerousness of the job. A sample of 827 police officers was drawn from two districts in the state of Haryana in India. Supervisor and coworker trust had statistically significant negative effects on job stress, while management trust had nonsignificant negative effects. Job autonomy and views on quality training also had significant negative effects, while perceptions of the job as dangerous and role overload had significant positive effects. Role underload had nonsignificant effects. The results indicate that building coworker and supervisor trust, increasing job autonomy, improving views on quality training, and reducing role overload and perceptions of the job as posing a risk should reduce job stress for police officers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45526,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Criminology","volume":"17 1","pages":"81 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-021-09355-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Trust is a vital part of society and is critical for organizations. The main forms of organizational trust are management trust, supervisor trust, and coworker trust, each of which allows organizations to function and operate efficiently. This is particularly true for police agencies. Yet, few studies have examined how organizational trust affects police officers. The job of a police officer can be demanding, often resulting in heightened job stress. It is unclear whether organizational trust can reduce job stress or, conversely, whether low or non-existent organizational trust contributes to job stress. The current study explored the effects of management trust, supervisor trust, and coworker trust on job stress among Indian police officers, while also assessing the effects of job autonomy, views on quality training, role overload, role underload, and perceived dangerousness of the job. A sample of 827 police officers was drawn from two districts in the state of Haryana in India. Supervisor and coworker trust had statistically significant negative effects on job stress, while management trust had nonsignificant negative effects. Job autonomy and views on quality training also had significant negative effects, while perceptions of the job as dangerous and role overload had significant positive effects. Role underload had nonsignificant effects. The results indicate that building coworker and supervisor trust, increasing job autonomy, improving views on quality training, and reducing role overload and perceptions of the job as posing a risk should reduce job stress for police officers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察组织信任与工作压力的初步研究
信任是社会的重要组成部分,对组织至关重要。组织信任的主要形式有管理信任、主管信任和同事信任,每一种信任都能使组织有效地运作和运作。对于警察机构来说尤其如此。然而,很少有研究调查组织信任如何影响警察。警察的工作要求很高,经常导致工作压力增加。目前尚不清楚组织信任是否可以减少工作压力,或者相反,低组织信任或不存在组织信任是否会导致工作压力。本研究探讨了管理信任、主管信任和同事信任对印度警察工作压力的影响,同时也评估了工作自主性、对质量培训的看法、角色过载、角色负荷不足和工作感知危险的影响。从印度哈里亚纳邦的两个地区抽取了827名警察样本。主管信任和同事信任对工作压力有显著的负向影响,而管理信任对工作压力无显著的负向影响。工作自主性和对质量培训的看法也有显著的负面影响,而工作危险和角色过载的看法有显著的积极影响。角色负荷不足的影响不显著。结果表明,建立同事和主管的信任、增加工作自主性、提高对质量培训的看法、减少角色过载和工作风险的认知,可以减轻警察的工作压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Criminology
Asian Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Electronic submission now possible! Please see the Instructions for Authors. For general information about this new journal please contact the publisher at [welmoed.spahr@springer.com] The Asian Journal of Criminology aims to advance the study of criminology and criminal justice in Asia, to promote evidence-based public policy in crime prevention, and to promote comparative studies about crime and criminal justice. The Journal provides a platform for criminologists, policymakers, and practitioners and welcomes manuscripts relating to crime, crime prevention, criminal law, medico-legal topics and the administration of criminal justice in Asian countries. The Journal especially encourages theoretical and methodological papers with an emphasis on evidence-based, empirical research addressing crime in Asian contexts. It seeks to publish research arising from a broad variety of methodological traditions, including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and comparative methods. The Journal fosters a multi-disciplinary focus and welcomes manuscripts from a variety of disciplines, including criminology, criminal justice, law, sociology, psychology, forensic science, social work, urban studies, history, and geography.
期刊最新文献
Organizational Structure and Its Connection with the Justice Views of Police Officers Investigating the Moderators in the Relationship Between Righteous Anger and Support for Lynching Translational and Transnational Approaches in Comparative Criminological Research: A Content Analysis Focused on Asian Countries Assessing Police Stress in the Philippines during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Community Size Matter? Trust in Legal Institutions: An Examination of the Philippines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1