A Review of Noise Pollution Policies in the Arab World

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理 Acoustics Australia Pub Date : 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s40857-023-00294-9
Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir, Djihed Berkouk, Dietrich Schwela, Maria Lahlouh
{"title":"A Review of Noise Pollution Policies in the Arab World","authors":"Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir,&nbsp;Djihed Berkouk,&nbsp;Dietrich Schwela,&nbsp;Maria Lahlouh","doi":"10.1007/s40857-023-00294-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to study the current legislation in the Arab world regarding noise pollution and to compare its laws, in a second step, with those of the European Union to identify the differences and similarities between these two groups of countries' policies. The methodology of this study was based mainly on analytical and comparative approaches to process the data collected from 31 legislation texts from 22 Arab countries. The data were obtained primarily from the official and governmental websites of the various ministries and state institutions concerned with environmental laws, using Arabic and second-language web searches in each country. This study shows that legislators in the investigated countries are relatively engaged in addressing environmental issues, especially noise pollution. Except for Somalia, all Arab League member countries have developed laws and regulations on noise pollution. However, there are no guidelines on noise measurement except in Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. As well, the governments of these countries still need to develop guidelines for noise mapping. Therefore, it is believed that the legislation in these countries needs to be revised and stronger. In addition, no trace of the soundscape subject has been highlighted in the Arabic legislative texts. The comparative analysis indicates that most Arab laws do not comply with the international standards established by the European Union governments. According to this study, revising and updating Arab laws is necessary, and action strategies must be implemented to achieve sustainability goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54355,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics Australia","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-023-00294-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper aims to study the current legislation in the Arab world regarding noise pollution and to compare its laws, in a second step, with those of the European Union to identify the differences and similarities between these two groups of countries' policies. The methodology of this study was based mainly on analytical and comparative approaches to process the data collected from 31 legislation texts from 22 Arab countries. The data were obtained primarily from the official and governmental websites of the various ministries and state institutions concerned with environmental laws, using Arabic and second-language web searches in each country. This study shows that legislators in the investigated countries are relatively engaged in addressing environmental issues, especially noise pollution. Except for Somalia, all Arab League member countries have developed laws and regulations on noise pollution. However, there are no guidelines on noise measurement except in Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. As well, the governments of these countries still need to develop guidelines for noise mapping. Therefore, it is believed that the legislation in these countries needs to be revised and stronger. In addition, no trace of the soundscape subject has been highlighted in the Arabic legislative texts. The comparative analysis indicates that most Arab laws do not comply with the international standards established by the European Union governments. According to this study, revising and updating Arab laws is necessary, and action strategies must be implemented to achieve sustainability goals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯世界噪音污染政策综述
本文旨在研究阿拉伯世界关于噪音污染的现行立法,并将其法律与欧盟的法律进行比较,以确定这两组国家政策之间的异同。本研究的方法主要基于分析和比较方法,以处理从22个阿拉伯国家的31个立法文本中收集的数据。这些数据主要来自与环境法有关的各部委和国家机构的官方和政府网站,在每个国家使用阿拉伯语和第二语言进行网络搜索。这项研究表明,被调查国家的立法者相对致力于解决环境问题,尤其是噪音污染问题。除索马里外,所有阿拉伯联盟成员国都制定了关于噪音污染的法律法规。然而,除阿曼、卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯外,没有噪音测量指南。同样,这些国家的政府仍然需要制定噪音测绘指南。因此,人们认为,这些国家的立法需要修订和加强。此外,阿拉伯语立法文本中没有强调声景主题的痕迹。比较分析表明,大多数阿拉伯法律不符合欧盟政府制定的国际标准。根据这项研究,修订和更新阿拉伯法律是必要的,必须实施行动战略以实现可持续性目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acoustics Australia
Acoustics Australia ACOUSTICS-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Acoustics Australia, the journal of the Australian Acoustical Society, has been publishing high quality research and technical papers in all areas of acoustics since commencement in 1972. The target audience for the journal includes both researchers and practitioners. It aims to publish papers and technical notes that are relevant to current acoustics and of interest to members of the Society. These include but are not limited to: Architectural and Building Acoustics, Environmental Noise, Underwater Acoustics, Engineering Noise and Vibration Control, Occupational Noise Management, Hearing, Musical Acoustics.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Assessment of the Flow Recirculation Effect on the Noise Measurement of a Free-Flying Multi-rotor UAS in a Closed Anechoic Chamber Multi-channel ANC System with Online Secondary Path Modeling for Turboprop Aircraft Cabin Assessing the Acoustic Noise in Intensive Care Units via Deep Learning Technique News Item News Item
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1